DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."
Monday, November 06, 2006
PREDICTIONS: WHO'S GONNA WIN, DEAN & PELOSI OR ROVE & MEHLMAN?
Reliapundit: Dean and Pelosi are Left-wing morons. Rove and Mehlman are not. And neither are most Americns. So - even though the MSM is worth 15% - the GOP wins, holding the House and the Senate.
Crying, whining, excuses and ubsubstantiated claims. The best talent a loser has is to make excuses about why he lost. Thanks for the awesome display of your talent.
I think the only two scientific studies of mortality in Iraq comparing pre- and post- war conditions found that the risk of violent death was very, very much higher after the war. I'm sure that you're doing something fundamentally dishonest to get your figures, like comparing undocumented pre-war deaths under Saddam (i.e. total guesses) against documented deaths since the invasion (i.e. vast under-reportings), but it would be interesting to see your evidence.
The documented civilian death toll due to violence has risen significantly this year.
5 comments:
I agree, but I think it's gonna be close in the House.
The Dems take the House and pick up 5 Senate seats.
As usual, 'pundit, when you're wrong, you don't go for half-measures. I have a few words for you:
"Speaker Pelosi"
"Majority Leader Reid"
"supboena power"
Enjoy.
we lost.
the msm won.
as they did in 1974.
voter fraud in MO and MD and VA helped.
the economy is good and we are winning in iraq.
fact: fewer iraqis are dying each month this years than last or the year before thaty and much less than under saddam.
but the average jane doesn;lt know that fact - because of the leftist media.
speaker pelosi is the best thing to happen to the gop since george mcgovern.
Crying, whining, excuses and ubsubstantiated claims. The best talent a loser has is to make excuses about why he lost. Thanks for the awesome display of your talent.
I think the only two scientific studies of mortality in Iraq comparing pre- and post- war conditions found that the risk of violent death was very, very much higher after the war. I'm sure that you're doing something fundamentally dishonest to get your figures, like comparing undocumented pre-war deaths under Saddam (i.e. total guesses) against documented deaths since the invasion (i.e. vast under-reportings), but it would be interesting to see your evidence.
The documented civilian death toll due to violence has risen significantly this year.
Post a Comment