BLAMING THE IRAQ WAR FOR INCREASING JIHADOTERROR IS LIKE BLAMING THE POPE'S SPEECH FOR THE RIOTS WHICH FOLLOWED IT

YUP: BLAMING THE IRAQ WAR FOR INCREASING JIHADOTERROR IS LIKE BLAMING THE POPE'S SPEECH FOR THE RIOTS WHICH FOLLOWED IT. This iditoic approach absolves the enemy of their part, their choices, their guilt. As I have written before: We can NEVER be held responsible for what the jihadoterrorists do.

The fact is, that it was al Qaeda that decided to make Iraq a central front in their Global Jihad, not the USA or the Iraqis. Remember: the Bali bombing was BEFORE the Iraq War even started. As were many MANY other international jihadoterrorist attacks. Like.... er um: 9/11.

But we should NOT be surpirsed that this attack on Bush is being made by the CIA: they've been attacking him since the start of the war; the Plame-Wilson Affair was just one of their efforts - an attempt at a virtual coup d'etat against Bush.

The anti-war crowd always blames America first. Unless they can blame the Pope or Israel.

This crowd is made up of a bunch of post-modern elitists who are fundamentally anti-West. Folks like Kerry's father - a life-long State Department official who wrote a book in which he argued a diminshed USA would be good for the world. QUOTE:

The Star-Spangled Mirror [Richard Kerry's book] is a critique of moralism in America's foreign policy -- and, more than that, it is a critique of America's national character.

"Americans," he writes, "are inclined to see the world and foreign affairs in black and white." They celebrate their own form of government and denigrate all others, making them guilty of what he calls "ethnocentric accommodation -- everyone ought to be like us." As a result, America has committed the "fatal error" of "propagating democracy" and fallen prey to "the siren's song of promoting human rights," falsely assuming that our values and institutions are a good fit in the Third World. And, just as Americans exaggerate their own goodness, they exaggerate their enemies' badness.

The Soviet Union wasn't nearly as imperialistic as American politicians warned, [Richard] Kerry argues. "Seeing the Soviet Union as the aggressor in every instance, and the U.S. as only reacting defensively, relieves an American observer from the need to see any parallel between our use of military power in distant parts of the world, and the Soviet use of military power outside the Soviet Union," he writes.

Just as Kerry's father, Richard, APOLOGIZED for the USSR and ATTACKED the USA, so too now do they APOLOGIZE for JIHADOTERRORISTS and attack Bush.

WHY IS THIS SO?! The CIA and the State Department are still dominated by post-modern Leftists and anti-Semitic status quoists like Kerry's father.

This report is merely another attempt by these status quoists to topple Bush, and demolish his policies. IT WON'T WORK. WHY?! Patriotic Americans don't retreat. We have only just begun to fight.