Scum. And Kofi is there, of course - beaming and shaking hands. Scum. Tyrnats, thugs, crooks, Marxists, jihadists. Scum.
AND WHILE HE'S THERE, DOES KOFI TALK ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS WOITHING THE "NON-ALIGNED" NATIONS, (ZIMBABWE, CUBA, VENEZUELA, NORTH KOREA - FOR STARTERS)? NO.
HE TALKED ABOUT THE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZE! And how they should each expand the welfare state. Sheesh.
More HERE.
AND WHILE HE'S THERE, DOES KOFI TALK ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS WOITHING THE "NON-ALIGNED" NATIONS, (ZIMBABWE, CUBA, VENEZUELA, NORTH KOREA - FOR STARTERS)? NO.
HE TALKED ABOUT THE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZE! And how they should each expand the welfare state. Sheesh.
More HERE.
7 comments:
I know it's naiive of me, but I just sit here and think, "How could the leader of the UN go to that summit?"
The other question I have is what the hell is Singh doing there?
Any thoughts?
It seems to me that you have entirely misrepresented what Kofi Annan actually said.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/world/americas/5351085.stm.
"Mr Annan told the Non-Aligned Movement in Cuba that the war in Lebanon had been a wake up call to the world.
He also urged leaders to respect human rights, to end oppression and to honour press freedom"
and
"The daily violence we are witnessing in Iraq and Afghanistan provides a powerful reminder that, without judicious intervention on the political front, the slide to anarchy and civil war becomes inexorable."
But he also stressed that leaders should look after the welfare of their own people. "We need governments of the south to fulfil their obligations to their people at home," Mr Annan said.
people should attend to their own welfare.
the daily violence in iraq is the result of jihadoterror.
urging leaders who have repressed their people for decades is a joke. next thing you know, he'll threaten to end a harshly worded letter. wow.
kofi said the hizballah war was a "wake up call to the world." wtf does tha mean exactly?! is he saying that iran and syria - attendees to the conference - are to blame?! NOPE. it is all vague BS.
The isrzel is hardly the center iof the world's worst warfare.ki8lling.genicide - not by a lingshot.
shouldn't kofi get some action on darfur!?
frankly, i think the USA should just bomb the hell out of the sudanese muslims perpetrating the genocide - until they come the the negotiating table in earnest. when clinton did this against milosevic it got him to sign the dayton accord.
the unsc is a waste. it can act only through consensus. as l;ong a scumbag nations like russia and france and china have a veto the un is worthless.
what is right and just and what promotes universal human rights (according to the UN's own charter) cannot ever be decided by consensus. thee is no consensus on darfur, but that does not make inaction right.
except for singling out istrel and atacking israel the un does nothing. except provide ways for crook l;ike kofi and his cronies to enrich themselves through bribes.
it is not surprising that you, peter - a leftie, defends the worthless UN and its corrupt leader kofi. it is in keeping with the contemporary l;eft's post-modernism. and its concomitant moral relativism.
as post modernists you hate the west and blame it for third world poverty and global warming and most of humanity's genocide. ALL FALSE. as post modernists you assert that all value systems are functionally and morally equivalent - that right and wrong are not universal but defined by each culture. WRONG AGAIN. slavery, misogyny and genocide are wrong period - anywhere and everyuwhere they are practiced.
and they are mostly practiced n the so-called non-aligned nations.
the boat people weren't fleeing the usa to enter marxist cuba or marxist vietnam, were they!?
get real. or not. spin kofi anyway you please. call fidel a freedom fighter too, if you want, and araft while you're at it!
in my book they are scum.
What the hell is with Singh?
VESTIGE OF INDIA'S SUBSERVIENCE TO USSR.
That's what I thought.
Damn, how stupid.
"shouldn't kofi get some action on darfur!?" OF COURSE HE SHOULD but as per usual someone in the security council abstained when it was put to a vote.(both Russia and China) I am not here defend the UN from charges of corruption and gross inefficiency. I was merely pointing out that YOU DO NOT TO TELL LIES to make this point, which should be bloody obvious to most dispassionate observers. Why it should come as a surprise to you that the UN is very very very slow at ever doing anything useful is beyond me. You never seem to have much to say in favour of Congress. Everyone in there lives in the same country and can speak pretty good "american English"
The UN, by contrast, is full of bureaucrats from nearly 200 different nations who speak God knows how many languages. Each of those countries have different histories, and the people in them hold different prejudices/belief systems. Frankly you would need the patience of a Saint to put up with all the pointless meetings with complete boneheads. Kofi Annan isnt the problem.
Post a Comment