"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Monday, March 20, 2006

WHAT DO HARVARD, CINDY SHEEHAN, DAVID DUKE, JIM MORAN, AND THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ALL HAVE IN COMMON?

THEY ALL BELIEVE THAT IT'S IT'S THE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZE FAULT!

YUP: 9/11 AND THE IRAQ WAR ARE THE FAULT OF THE JEWS, ACCORDING TO THE DEAN OF THE KENNEDY SCHOOL AT HARVARD. YOU KNOW HARVARD. THAT'S THE UNIVERSITY WHOSE FACULTY JUST SQUEEZED OUT THEIR JEWISH PRESIDENT, LARRY SUMMERS.

HARVARD. DAVID DUKE. AND THE JIHADOFASCIST ORGANIZATION "THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD." THEY'RE ALL ON THE SAME EXACT PAGE. IN THEIR OWN WORDS.

PROOF IN TWO MUST READS FROM SCOTT JOHNSON AT POWERLINE; HERE AND HERE.

AS I HAVE WRITTEN BEFORE: SCRATCH A LEFTIST AND YOU FIND AN ANTI-SEMITE. HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF THE BLATANT ANTI-SEMITISM OF THE ARTICLE; THEY WRITE:
"... Israel is a strategic and moral liability..."
ISRAEL IS A MORAL LIABILITY TO THESE GUYS! (CAN YOU EFFIN BELIEVE THAT!?) AND THESE TWO ANTI-SEMITIC APPEASERS BELIEVE THAT SURRENDERING TO JIHADOTERRORISTS (WHO MURDER CHILDREN, BEHEAD CHARITY WORKERS AND COMMIT GENOCIDE AGAINST THEIR FELLOW MUSLIMS) IS MORAL. THEY HAVE IT EXACTLY BACKWARDS - AS LEFTISTS ALMOST ALWAYS DO.

THESE AUTHORS ARE IMMORAL SCUM.

THEY WRITE IT AS IF THE WORLD AND THE USA WOULD BE BETTER OFF IF BAATHISTS - (LIKE ASSAD AND SADDAM), ARAB TYRANTS - (LIKE MUBARAK AND KADDAFY), AND WAHHABIST PRINCES WERE APPEASED AND IF THEY RULED THE HOLY LAND, AND THAT THE WHOLE WORLD WOULD BE BETTER OFF IF ISRAEL NEVER EXISTED.

THIS IS CLASSIC APPEASEMENT, AND IT WOULD BE AS EFFECTIVE NOW AT MAKING THE FREE WORLD SAFE, AS SURRENDERING THE SUDATENLAND TO HITLER MADE THE FREE WORLD IN 1939. IT DIDN'T WORK THEN AND IT WOULDN'T WORK NOW.

SINCE THE AUTHORS KNOW ABOUT CHAMBERLAIN, THE MUNICH AGREEMENT AND THE SUDATENLAND - AND KNOW THAT IT FAILED, THE ONLY EXPLANATION FOR ADVOCATING SURRENDERING ISRAEL ON THE SAME ALTAR OF APPEASEMENT TO TYRANNY IS ANTI-SEMITISM.

AND MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT: DUKE - LIKE HITLER, SADDAM, ARAFAT, AND CINDY SHEEHAN AND THE AUTHORS OF THIS ARTICLE - IS A LEFTIST -- AS ARE MOST FACULTY MEMBERS OF HARVARD.

MORE ON THE "ANTI-WAR" LEFT HERE - AT THE AMERCIAN THINKER.

11 comments:

newc said...

Withought Israel or JOOOS, you would have NO America.

Spartan said...

Ok, I just want to point out that hitler was deffinatly NOT left wing. He was polarized to the right wing. Tyrant doesn't mean leftist. There are Tyrants on both sides of the spectrum.

read "The origians of totalitarianism" by Hannah Arendt
it's a good book that goes into the ragimes of both hitler and Stallin.

Gandalin said...

Spartan,

I hate to disillusion you but Hitler was DEFINITELY a leftist. He was a socialist.

"Nazi" is short for NAtional SoZIalist, the full name of the Nazi Party was the National Sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei (NSDAP) - the National SOCIALIST German Workers' Party. Sounds pretty left wing to me.

Hitler was an anti-communist because he was competing with the communists for the same working-class, anti-capitalist voters.

The Nazi regime employed more economic planners than did Stalin's Russia. Nazi Germany was definitely a socialistic command economy, and not a free market.

Professor John Ray has posted dozens of fruther examples of Hitler's leftism in his article "Hitler Was A Socialist."

http://jonjayray.netfirms.com/hitler.html

I know you have an open mind and are willing to deal with the facts. Read John Ray's article for a real eye-opener.

All the best,

Gandalin

reliapundit said...

sparty baby;

the traditional left-right spectrum is BS.

in the traditional l-r spectrum commies are on the extreme left

and fascists on the extreme right.

IN THU\IS SCHEME THERE OS NO LOGICAL PL:CE FOR ANARCHISTS.

the correct scheme - or spectrum - puts all STATISTS ism's on the left: fascism and marxism and coimmunism, moaism. pol potism, stakinism, kim-ism. mugabism, castrism, etc.

they are all statist and ALL argued thsat individuals and the free marketplace should be subverted to the needs of the state. hitler said DAS VOLK - the people. the masses is another fav' of the left.

mussolini was named benito for mexican socialist juarez, and his pop as the founder of the socialist party of italy.

a fasci - that bundle of wheat that's on the back of your fdr dime 0 is a ROMAN symmbols which eamsn that a single straw is weak, but a bundle - a fasci - is strong; therefore subvert yourself to the collective, to the state - TO THE BORG.

an accurate and logical spoectrun outs anarchism on the rightr and statist creeds on the elft - and inn the middle goes stuff like we have here in the USA and like they have there in scandinavia: middling degrees of state incolvement, and varyong amioujtn of state psonsored wlefare for individuals and corporations.

in this logical and accurate spectrum/scheme one MUST admit that hitler is closer to stalin than to washington and lincoln.

OR THINK OF IT THIS WAY: stalin and trotsky were both commies - though they fopught an internceine war --- ending in trostky's assassination.

hitlewr was a cousin.

hitler wqs a socilaist who was an anti-Marxist.

REMEBER: socialiusm pre-dates marxism by a hundred years!

marixms is but one form od socialsim.

marxism/leninism/stalinism was INTERNATIONALIST.

hitler - like mussolini- was nationalist. hit;ler was also RACIST sociialism.

BOTTOM-LINE: hitler was of the left.

The Popinjay said...

Kinda reminds me of the end of Animal Farm when the pigs and the farmers looked exactly the same.

Bushwack said...

It doesn't matter what Hitler was. What matters is what happened to Hitler. What did he do? and will we ever learn from history? The same conclusions can be drawn in todays time, We are at war with a culture and an ideology that wants us wiped off the earth. Us being anyone not Muslim.
That is the point and appeasement is not now nor was it then the answer. We must defeat this plaque called islamic extremism before it has a chance to destroy us.

reliapundit said...

yeah jr; orwell was a genius.
luv "homage to catalonia."
and several others. a true visionary.

my point is that the ideologies which want individuals to sacrifice their autonomy are all of the same ilk. and all bad.

and also that if you read "mein kampf" it reads like ANY socialist propaganda.

opnly democracy is moral because democracy is the only system where the government derices its power form the governed, by coinsent of the governed, by consent of INDIVIDUALS.

the only true soveriegn iss the self over the individual.

the state derives it's power from individuals.

there's a collective power for mutual defense becasue we each iof us have the innate right to self defense, and as members of a society we give some of our own individual rights to the styate for our mutual defense.

there is no right to covet or steal - to take what is not yours. so an individuakl cannot give this to the state. so there can be no "real right" of the state to tax.

when the state takes rightrs from individuals depsite the fact that the idnividuals don't weant to give them up, this is usuptation.

socialists are covetous people who want the state to take from others - from the people they covet. they favor high taxes, and anything wlse which denigrates individualism.

hitler was a socialist - pure and simple.

socialists hate jews because jews believe in two BIG things which threatens their statism: (1) the sovereingity of GOD - and God's laws.
and (2) the centrality of one's own actions; one's own actions are determinative of one's soul; we each have to take responsibility for our own carnal and spritual lives.

almost all socia;lists were anti-semites and or atheists.
including peres and ben gurion. in fact, the kibbutzim socialist zionist were not very religious.

andn of course, whern these kibbustzim dominate disrael, the left - and the EU - liked israel more.

scratch a soshie and you find an anti-semite.

and someone who rejects the sanctity of the individual.

thanks for popping by, commenting, and linking. luv your blogging at poppinjay and bloggernews!

Gandalin said...

Bushwhack,

You are right, we should concentrate on the enemies who have openly and explicitly announced their intention to annihilate us (and by us I mean the U.S., the West in general) -- but our enemies have friends within our society, and these friends of our enemies are on the Left. The Left is trying to use the jihad as another means of destroying free market capitalist society, and we need to continue defeating the Left at home as much as we need to defeat the jihad overseas.

One of the biggest lies of Leftist propaganda is that totalitarianism comes in both right-wing and left-wing flavors -- with Soviet Communism admitted as an example of Leftwing totalitarianism and National Socialism given as an example of right wing totalitarianism.

In fact, however, all the forms of twentieth century totalitarianism were LEFT Wing. Communism, Naziism, Fascism - all were leftwing, socialist ideologies that promoted statism, controlled command economies -- and all were tyrannies, genocidal, democidal tyrannies. Islamism is another statist totalitarian ideology of a similar sort.

University faculties in our country are dominated by leftwing totalitarian ideologues who are poisoning our children and our culture. The mass media are dominated by naive "folk marxists" who are poisoning public discourse.

We need to understand them to defeat them.

And don't forget, either, that FDR's chief State Department adviser at Yalta (where Eastern Europe was surrendered to Stalin) was a communist perjurer, Alger Hiss.

All the best,

Gandalin

Wolfie said...

Really guys. I find it quite exasperating reading the endless posts comparing Nazism to Radical Islam. Why? Because they have so little in common but more alarmingly that these comparisons are causing governments and individuals to develop counterproductive strategies in tackling these problems. Its so easy for the Islamic Radicals to confuse you too isn't it? Just throw in a bit of anti-Semitism and off you go like clockwork toys... Nazi this, Hitler that, Holocaust the other. When are people going to start thinking for themselves?

reliapundit said...

wolfie:

this post compares nazism to other forms of leftism and argues that the left is the home of anti-semitism.

this post doesn't directly compare nazism to islamism - though there are similarities and differences.

therefore wolfie, i suggest you read alittle more carefully.

in my post i am comparing the appeasement of the past to the current proposed appeasement of anti-semites.

i compare the anti-semite harvard/u od chicago authors to CHAMBERLAIN, not to hitler.

Anonymous said...

Let's remember that all a Nazi is, when you strip away the propaganda, is simply someone who stands in defense of white Christendom, who doesn't think that white Christian societies are evil.

So, who came up with the idea that white Christian societies are Nazism? -- was it Christians? I think it was those who expect us to drain our treasury and blood into the Middle East to protect the Jewish ethno-state. Let's all give support to pro-white sites like www.nationalvanguard.org