WHO IS SERIOUS ABOUT WAGING WAR, AND WHO IS NOT?

CLIFF MAY/NRO:

If an al-Qaeda operative in Karachi phones someone in Paris, France and tells him to go to the US to carry out an act of terrorism – obviously the President would have the authority to listen to that conversation without a warrant.But if an al-Qaeda operative in Karachi phones someone in Paris, Texas and tells him to go to Houston to carry out an act of terrorism -- the President would not have that authority to listen to that conversation without a warrant? In other words, once a terrorist lands on American soil he must be given additional rights, including an expectation of privacy when he gets a phone call from Osama bin Laden. That's what the administration’s critics are arguing.

AND IT'S STUPID! AND IT IF THE LEFT WINS THIS "DEBATE" THEN WE ARE MORE VULNERABLE TO AN ATTACK BECAUSE THE ENEMY WILL HAVE LEARNED FROM THIS INEXCUSEABLE BREACH AND THEY WILL USE THE INFO THEY'VE GAINED TO BECOME BETTER ABLE TO HARM US.

The Left is NOT serious about waging war against the enemy; they only want to wage war against Bush. Becasue Bush is our CinC, this makes the Left the enemy, too.