IT'S OFFICIAL: MONOGAMY UNDER LEGAL ATTACK....

... AND BECAUSE OF THE GAY MARRIAGE DECISION - ACCORDING TO CJ ROBERTS,  THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS ANYMORE TO STOP THE POLYGAMISTS.

News of the legal challenge here.

This is all part of thr left's Gramscian Agenda and plan to TRANSFORM America into a second rate world power and third world socialist banana republic.

As Chavez did to Venezuela, so Obama is doing to the USA - in spades...

1968 Redux, AKA: The Second Coming of postmodernist mayhem

IN THE LATE 1960'S WE HAD AND AGGRESSIVE TYRANNY IN THE USSR, WOODSTOCK AND RACE RIOTS AND FREE SEX AND LOVE, DRUGS...

A GENERAL ATTACK BY POSTMODERNISM ON TRADITIONAL JUDEO-CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION.

THE SAME CONFLUENCE OF EVENTS TODAY - AND FOR THE SAME REASONS:

TODAY'S NYTIMES FRONT PAGE: GAY MARRIAGE AND RIOTS...

POSTMODERNISM ATTACKS CIVILIZATION AND THEN THE CRETINS, EVIL-DOERS, AND THEIR RUNNING DOGS AND LACKEYS STEP INTO THE VOID...

WITHOUT THE VALUES AND INSTITUTIONS WHICH HAVE MEDIATED AND MODERATED HUMAN BEHAVIOR FOR 3000 YEARS, CHAOS REIGNS...

POSTMODERN LEFTISTS FOMENT THAT CHAOS IN THE HOPE THAT THEY CAN SEIZE POWER IN THE AFTERMATH. IT'S THEIR GRAMSCIAN AGENDA.

AND WITH OBAMA IN THE WHITE HOUSE, IT'S ONCE AGAIN WORKING...

SIGH.

THE SECOND COMING
WB YEATS

Turning and turning in the widening gyre  
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere  
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst  
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.  
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out  
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert  
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,  
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,  
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it  
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.  
The darkness drops again; but now I know  
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,  
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,  
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?


Source: The Collected Poems of W. B. Yeats

BRUCE JENNER IS MENTALLY ILL

Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: Transgender is ‘Mental Disorder;' Sex Change ‘Biologically Impossible’

Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder. Dr. McHugh, the author of six books and at least 125 peer-reviewed medical articles, made his remarks in a recent commentary in the Wall Street Journal, where he explained that transgender surgery is not the solution for people who suffer a “disorder of ‘assumption’” – the notion that their maleness or femaleness is different than what nature assigned to them biologically.  

He also reported on a new study showing that the suicide rate among transgendered people who had reassignment surgery is 20 times higher than the suicide rate among non-transgender people. Dr. McHugh further noted studies from Vanderbilt University and London’s Portman Clinic of children who had expressed transgender feelings but for whom, over time, 70%-80% “spontaneously lost those feelings.” 

While the Obama administration, Hollywood, and major media such as Time magazine promote transgenderism as normal, said Dr. McHugh, these “policy makers and the media are doing no favors either to the public or the transgendered by treating their confusions as a right in need of defending rather than as a mental disorder that deserves understanding, treatment and prevention. ... This intensely felt sense of being transgendered constitutes a mental disorder in two respects. The first is that the idea of sex misalignment is simply mistaken – it does not correspond with physical reality. The second is that it can lead to grim psychological outcomes.” The transgendered person’s disorder, said Dr. McHugh, is in the person’s “assumption” that they are different than the physical reality of their body, their maleness or femaleness, as assigned by nature. 

It is a disorder similar to a “dangerously thin” person suffering anorexia who looks in the mirror and thinks they are “overweight,” said McHugh. This assumption, that one’s gender is only in the mind regardless of anatomical reality, has led some transgendered people to push for social acceptance and affirmation of their own subjective “personal truth,” said Dr. McHugh. As a result, some states – California, New Jersey, and Massachusetts – have passed laws barring psychiatrists, “even with parental permission, from striving to restore natural gender feelings to a transgender minor,” he said. 

The pro-transgender advocates do not want to know, said McHugh, that studies show between 70% and 80% of children who express transgender feelings “spontaneously lose those feelings” over time. Also, for those who had sexual reassignment surgery, most said they were “satisfied” with the operation “but their subsequent psycho-social adjustments were no better than those who didn’t have the surgery.” 

“And so at Hopkins we stopped doing sex-reassignment surgery, since producing a ‘satisfied’ but still troubled patient seemed an inadequate reason for surgically amputating normal organs,” said Dr. McHugh. The former Johns Hopkins chief of psychiatry also warned against enabling or encouraging certain subgroups of the transgendered, such as young people “susceptible to suggestion from ‘everything is normal’ sex education,” and the schools’ “diversity counselors” who, like “cult leaders,” may “encourage these young people to distance themselves from their families and offer advice on rebutting arguments against having transgender surgery.” 

Dr. McHugh also reported that there are “misguided doctors” who, working with very young children who seem to imitate the opposite sex, will administer “puberty-delaying hormones to render later sex-change surgeries less onerous – even though the drugs stunt the children’s growth and risk causing sterility.” Such action comes “close to child abuse,” said Dr. McHugh, given that close to 80% of those kids will “abandon their confusion and grow naturally into adult life if untreated ….”

WHO IS MCHUGH? HERE:

• University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry

• Former Henry Phipps Professor and Director (1975-2001)

• Former Psychiatrist-in-Chief, The Johns Hopkins Hospital (1975-2001)

• Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Paul Rodney McHugh (born 1931) is an American psychiatrist, researcher, and educator. He is University Distinguished Professor of Psychiatry at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine[1] 

Education 

McHugh was born in Lawrence, Massachusetts, the son of a Lowell High School teacher and a homemaker,[2][3] He graduated from Harvard College in 1952 and from Harvard Medical School in 1956. While at Harvard he was "introduced to and ultimately directed away from the Freudian school of psychiatry."[4][5] 

Following medical school, McHugh's education was influenced by George Thorn, the Physician-in-Chief at the Harvard-affiliated Peter Bent Brigham Hospital (now Brigham and Women's Hospital). Thorn was disillusioned with Freudian psychiatry and felt that those who devoted themselves to it became single-minded, failing to grow as doctors. Thorn encouraged McHugh to develop a different career path, suggesting that he enter the field of psychiatry by first studying neurology. At Thorn's recommendation, McHugh was accepted into the neurology and neuropathology residency program at the Massachusetts General Hospital where he studied for three years under Dr. Raymond Adams, the chief of the Neurology Department.[6] 

From Massachusetts General, McHugh went to the Institute of Psychiatry in London (where he studied under Sir Aubrey Lewis and was supervised by James Gibbons and Gerald Russell). Following his year in London, McHugh went to the Division of Neuropsychiatry at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.[7] 

McHugh believes that adult males who wish to surgically alter themselves to appear anatomically female fall into two main groups: (1) "conflicted and guilt-ridden homosexual men"[24] and (2) "heterosexual (and some bisexual) males who found intense sexual arousal in cross-dressing as females".[25] McHugh, had several other impressions: First, "they [the transgendered individuals] were little changed in their psychological condition. They had much the same problems with relationships, work, and emotions as before. The hope that they would emerge now from their emotional difficulties to flourish psychologically had not been fulfilled".[26] 

Second, they expressed little interest in and seemed indifferent to babies or children (typically female interests).[27] Third, they came off as caricatures of the opposite sex.[28] McHugh, P. R. (2006). "Surgical Sex" in The Mind Has Mountains: Reflections on Society and Psychiatry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp.220-228

THE PUSH TO NORMALIZE TRANSEXUALITY IS ART OF THE POSTMODERN LEFT'S GRAMSCIAN AGENDA.

SEEING THAT MARXISM HAD FAILED TO TAKE OVER AS MARX HAD PREDICTED, GRAMSCI PROPOSED THAT THE LEFT NEEDED TO DISMANTLE THE CULTURAL FOUNDATIONS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION FIRST, BEFORE THE STATE COULD BE TAKEN OVER BY SOCIALISTS.

HENCE THE LEFT'S ATTACKS ON FAMILY, AND CHURCH - AND EVERYTHING TRADITIONAL.

WHAT WAS ONCE DEVIANT BECOMES NORMAL UNDER POSTMODERNISM - NORMAL IF NOT LAUDATORY.

THE POSTMODERN LEFT CELEBRATES THE DEVIANT AND TRANSGRESSIVE AND SUBVERSIVE AND ATTACKS WHATEVER IS TRADITIONAL IN THE WEST.

OFTEN THE POSTMODERN LEFT ALSO CELEBRATES CULTURES THAT ARE NOT WESTERN - SUCH AS ISLAMIC CULTURE OR NATIVE AMAZONIAN CULTURE - USUALLY BY SHOWING THEM TO BE EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN WESTERN CULTURE. THEY DO THIS TO UNDERMINE OUR OWN FAITH IN OUR OWN CULTURE AND TO FOMENT OIKOPHOBIA.

GRAMSCIAN LEFTISTS KNOW THAT ONCE WE LOSE FAITH IN OUR OWN CULTURE, WE CAN BE MORE EASILY SWAYED TO ACCEPT THE CHANGES AND INSTITUTIONS THEY BELIEVE IN.

MORE POSTS ON GRAMSCI AND THE LEFT'S GRAMSCIAN AGENDA HERE.

OTHERS COMMENTING ON THIS NEWS HERE.

NYTIMES NON-STOP GRAMSCIAN AGENDA CONTINUES UNABATED - NOW FEATURING TRANSGENDER VAGRANTS

NYTIMES - SAN FRANCISCO — There were times — after he told his parents he was gay, for example, and his mother wept and his father tried to hit him — when Fredy Bolvito curled up on a bench in Union Square here and cried because he had AIDS and no job and no place to stay and he felt, he said, that “my life was over.”

But there were also days when he sat on the bench in the square and sang “The Star-Spangled Banner,” looking up at the flags atop the Westin St. Francis hotel and thinking, “That’s breathtaking, that’s my American dream.” Or when he mingled with tourists, giving them directions to the cable cars, or gazed through the windows at the shoppers in Macy’s and was saddened by how rich and healthy they looked. 

He scavenged for meals in garbage bins. He avoided the homeless shelters, where he had heard that gays were taunted, or worse. His “angel,” he said, was in the center of the square: the statue “Victory,” a trident in one hand, a wreath in the other. 

“I would look at it at night and think, ‘Oh my God, that’s my hope,’ ” he said. 

San Francisco is often viewed as a Mecca for gay people. But the warmth of the city’s welcome can quickly vanish for those who are poor. 

City leaders were startled this year when a survey revealed that 29 percent of the homeless population —about 2,100 of the 7,350 people counted — identified themselves as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. 

Bevan Dufty, the director of the city’s homelessness initiatives, said he was surprised the percentage held true for all age groups, even adults and the elderly. “What was really staggering was to see that it didn’t change as you got older,” he said. 

The survey found that gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender people who are homeless had higher rates of disability than homeless heterosexuals and were more likely to be homeless when they arrived in the city. Some of them were older gay men with AIDS who had been evicted from their apartments or people who had been cast out by their families in other states. Others, like Mr. Bolvito, a native of Guatemala who graduated from college in Hayward, Calif., with a degree in political science and once worked as a real estate agent, had good jobs that disappeared during the recession.

JUDGING BY THEIR FREQUENCY AND PROMINENCE, LGBT STORIES ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTEMPORARY ISSUE - AT LEAST ACCORDING TO THE POSTMODERN LEFTISTS EDITING THE NYTIMES.

THIS IS FINE - IF YOU WANT TO BE THE LGBT NEWSPAPER OF RECORD.

BUT IT'S A HUGE STEP DOWN FOR THE NEWSPAPER WHICH WAS ONCE THE INTERNATIONAL PAPER OF RECORD.

THE NYTIMES HAS TRADED IN THEIR ONCE WIDELY WELL-REGARDED OBJECTIVE REPORTING FOR PUSHING THE GRAMSCIAN AGENDA.

THEY'VE GONE FROM OBJECTIVE REPORTAGE TO SUBVERSIVE LIBERTINAGE.

THE MARQUIS DE SADE WOULD BE THRILLED.

GEORGE JONES AND HENRY RAYMOND - THE FOUNDERS OF THE NYTIMES - ARE SPINNING IN THEIR GRAVES.

IT NEVER STOPS: NYTIMES PUSHING GRAMSCIAN AGENDA

STYLE VIDEO: A Community of Co-ParentsDavid Dean had already had one son through a network of lesbian and gay co-parents when he met Steve Lowinger. They had one more child together, and in the process, built a large extended family. FROM THE AMOUNT OF CONSTANT COVERAGE THE NYTIMS GIVES THEM, YOU'D NEVER KNOW THAT JUST 3.4% OF THE USA POPULATION IS HOMOSEXUAL - AND MOST ARE SINGLE. THEIR COVERAGE IS NOT ABOUT NEWS; IT'S ABOUT ADVANCING AN AGENDA - A GRAMSCIAN AGENDA DESIGNED TO DEMOLISH TRADITIONAL CULTURE SO THEY CAN FILL THE VACUUM WITH THEIR SOCIALIST CRAP: ESSENTIALLY A SEXUALLY PERMISSIVE NANNYSTATE. WHICH MAKES THEM NOTHING MORE THAN PERVERTED ADOLESCENTS.

NYTIMES GRAMSCIAN AGENDA CONTINUES WITHOUT A BREAK: FEATURES TAILOR WHO MAKES MEN'S SUITS FOR LESBIANS

The Masculine Mystique

Custom Suits to Make Transgender and Female Clients Feel Handsome

WHY DOES WHAT WAS ONCE THE WORLD'S LEADING NEWSPAPER OF RECORD FEATURE A STORY SO PROMINENTLY ABOUT TRANSGENDER CUSTOM-TAILORING - SOMETHING WHICH DIRECTLY EFFECTS PERHAPS  1/2% OF THE PUBLIC?

BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN AGENDA.

THE NYTIMES DOESN'T COVER NEWS; THEY PROPAGANDIZE.

THIS IS WHY THE NYTIMES AND THE MSM ARE LOSING THEIR AUDIENCE.

LGBT PEOPLE ARE ONLY 3.4% OF THE POPULATION IN THE USA - ABOUT 9 MILLION; TRANSGENDER ARE ESTIMATED TO BE 700,000. YET THE NYTIMES TREAT THEM AS IF THEY WERE A LARGE SEGMENT OF THE POPULATION DESERVING OF 24/7 COVERAGE AND THE PRESIDENT'S WEEKLY FOCUS.

THE LEFT FOCUSES ON THE LGBT AS A WEDGE AND A HAMMER: TO ROUSE THEIR BASE - WHICH LIKE TO HAVE ALL THEIR BIASES INDULGED AND PROTECTED AND TO WEAKEN THE FOUNDATIONS OF TRADITIONAL WESTERN CIVILIZATION.

THE PROBLEMS OF HARD-WORKING AND CHURCH-GOING CITIZENS AND TAXPAYERS DON'T AMOUNT TO A HILL OF BEANS IN THIS CRAZY POSTMODERNIST DOMINATED WORLD.

THEY WOULD RATHER TRANSGENDERS GET SUITS AND SLUTS GET FREE BIRTH CONTROL A CONNECTED CRONIES GET "GREEN ECONOMY" SUBSIDIES AND LOANS, THAN GIVE HARD-WORKING FAMILIES A LITTLE TAX BREAK.

IN THE INTEREST OF OBJECTIVITY, I THINK THE WRITERS OF THE NYTIMES SHOULD REVEAL THEIR SEXUALITY AND PARTY AFFILIATION.

I BETHCYA THEY HAVE 80% HOMOSEXUALS AND 80% DEMOCRATS.

AND I BETCHYA THEY DON'T WANT THEIR DECLINING READERSHIP TO KNOW THIS.

THEY WANT TO KEEP UP THE RUSE THAT THEY ARE AN OBJECTIVE REPORTER OF FACTS.

THE NYTIMES IS AS OBJECTIVE AS PRAVDA WAS.

NYTIMES REPORTS/CELEBRATES THE LEFT'S GRAMSCIAN AGENDA: DESTROYING THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY

The Changing American Family 

Same-sex parents. Cohabiting couples. Voluntary kin. Children with parents in prison. Immigrant-Americans. What we thought of as the typical American family is being rapidly redefined. It is more diverse than it was even half a year ago.

IN MY OPINION, THIS IS NOT ABOUT THE ENBOURGEOISIFICATION OF THE SUBVERSIVE;

IT IS ABOUT THE ERADICATION OF THE TRADITIONAL - LONG A GOAL OF STATISTS WHO NEED TO DEMOLISH THE FAMILY, AND THE CHURCH, IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH TOTAL CONTROL OVER SOCIETY.

WITH CONTROL OF SCHOOLS, PENSIONS, HEALTHCARE - AND SOON CHURCHES AND THE FAMILY, THEY'LL CONTROL ALL THE INSTITUTIONS OF SOCIETY.

IN RETURN, THEY PROMISE THEIR ACOLYTES A CRADLE TO GRAVE SEXUALLY PERMISSIVE  NANNYTSTATE.

OF COURSE IT WILL ULTIMATELY FAIL - AS OBAMACARE IS ALREADY FAILING.

BUT MILLIONS WILL BE HURT ALONG THE WAY.

THE LEFTIST POLITICIANS DON'T CARE: THEY GET RICH AND POWERFUL ALONG THE WAY.

A Man Needs a Penis Like a Fish Needs a Bicycle: Sex, The Gramscian Agenda, And Public Schools

If thy penis offend thee, cut it off and cast it from thee.

From the Withersoon Institute:

Two years ago, the Massachusetts legislature enacted a statute prohibiting, among other things, discrimination in public schools on the basis of “gender identity.” The law defines gender identity as “a person’s gender-related identity, appearance or behavior,” which is not determined by “the person’s physiology or assigned sex at birth.” 

On the basis of that statute, the Massachusetts Department of Education (MDOE) has now eradicated sexual distinctions from public schools. MDOE’s new directive requires schools to let children use bathrooms and play on sports teams according to the gender they personally identify as theirs, not their anatomical sex. The directive also admonishes schools to eliminate sex and gender distinctions in graduation garb, physical education, and other practices.Under Massachusetts law, the connection between gender identity and sexual distinction is now considered a historical accident, the result of arbitrary (at best) or mistaken documentation at birth. MDOE’s directive explains: 

One’s gender identity is an innate, largely inflexible characteristic of each individual’s personality that is generally established by age four, although the age at which individuals come to understand and express their gender identity may vary based on each person’s social and familial social development. As a result, the person best situated to determine a student’s gender identity is that student himself or herself. 

Because the child is solely responsible for identifying his or her own gender, the regulations require school officials to seek the student’s permission before disclosing the student’s gender identity to his or her parents. 

That’s not all. The regulations suggest that students who don’t endorse a fellow student’s gender identity may be subject to punishment. After condemning bullying, the directive endorses a memorandum that a Massachusetts school principal sent to teachers instructing them to discipline students who intentionally refer to a transgender student by his or her given name, or the pronoun corresponding to his or her anatomical sex. Such behavior “should not be tolerated.” 

MDOE justifies these regulations on pedagogical grounds: “All students need a safe and supportive school environment to progress academically and developmentally.” By “all students” MDOE must mean all students who share MDOE’s conception of sex and gender as an individual choice. 

It is not difficult to imagine who will embrace MDOE’s conception. The regulations state, “A student who says she is a girl and wishes to be regarded that way throughout the school day and throughout every, or almost every, other area of her life, should be respected and treated like a girl” (emphasis ours). The caveat that the student might want to be treated like a boy for some purposes seems an implicit admission that gender identity is not, in fact, an inflexible characteristic, as MDOE insists, but rather can adjust over time. And the directive states that the law “does not require consistent and uniform assertion of gender identity” (emphasis original). 

While we doubt that teenage boys will take much interest in the provenance of gender personality, it’s not a stretch to suppose that they will welcome its implications for co-ed activity. 

Perhaps this is why many parents in Massachusetts find these regulations shocking. We must confess that we are not so surprised. Massachusetts lawmakers have for many years been eradicating sexual distinctions from the law. This result seems to us the logical consequence of those efforts. 

Redefining marriage to eliminate sexual complementarity as an essential characteristic doesn’t automatically commit a state to forcing girls to share locker rooms with boys. But there is a logical connection. One of the premises justifying the redefinition of marriage also grounds these new regulations, that is, the view that sexual difference is irrelevant to the practice of marriage. 

But if sexual difference is irrelevant to marriage, then how can it be relevant to any practices? Once the state has determined that sexual difference is no longer a legitimate reason to extend special recognition to man-woman monogamy, there is no reason in principle to maintain sexual distinctions in less intimate practices. If one’s anatomical reality isn’t relevant to one’s marriage, it’s even less obvious why it should be relevant to one’s bathroom choice. 

To be sure, there are prudential implications of eradicating sexual distinction from education laws. But if letting people identify their own gender is a matter of justice, then it’s the job of law to solve the practical problems of implementation. (That is a key lesson of civil rights legislation.) 

Though future practical problems might seem obvious, the law makes it far from clear that there are any. If a boy who identifies as a girl really is a girl, as the law declaims, then any perceived harms resulting from his presence in a girls’ locker room are illusory. No wonder the Commonwealth exhorts school officials to discipline students who object to the arrangement. 

There are other indications that those who perceive inherent differences between men and women will increasingly be marginalized from public life in Massachusetts. A few months ago, a federal court in Massachusetts ruled that the United States Constitution requires the Commonwealth’s Department of Corrections to pay for a sex-change surgery requested by an inmate who is serving time for murder. It is cruel and unusual punishment, the court reasoned, to force the prisoner to keep his anatomy intact while he is incarcerated.This ruling might seem unrelated to removing sexual distinctions from law, but for the court’s reasoning. The court discredited the Commonwealth’s expert witnesses, who expressed doubt that a sex-change surgery is medically necessary, and who recommended treating the prisoner’s psychological and emotional disorders instead. 

The court ruled that these recommendations are “not within the range that would be acceptable by prudent professionals.” In other words, the court decided that no prudent professional would deny sex-change surgery to a male prisoner who identifies himself as a woman. 

The lesson is clear. If you think male and female are two distinct sexes determined by your anatomy at birth, then don’t bother serving as an expert witness in the United States District Court in Massachusetts. Nor can you in good conscience send your children to public school in the Commonwealth. A view of human nature that until very recently was understood to be obvious is becoming a source of disqualification from participating in public life.

UPDATED: PERFECT SYMBOL FOR THE POSTMODERN LEFT: BRADLEY MANNING WANTS TO TRANSFORM HIMSELF INTO A GIRL

Bradley Manning, the Army private sentenced to military prison for leaking classified documents, revealed he intends to live out the remainder of his life as a woman. 

“I am Chelsea Manning. I am female,” the Army private wrote in a statement read on TODAY Thursday. “Given the way that I feel, and have felt since childhood, I want to begin hormone therapy as soon as possible. I hope that you will support me in this transition.” 

Manning, 25, was sentenced to 35 years in prison on Wednesday after having been found guilty of 20 charges ranging from espionage to theft for leaking more than 700,000 documents to the WikiLeaks website while working in Iraq in 2010.

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY THE PERFECT METAPHOR FOR THE POSTMODERN LEFT, WHICH HATES AMERICA AND THE WEST.

HE STOLE NATIONAL SECURITY SECRETS AND EXPOSED THEM TO HURT THE USA AND THE WEST.

NOW - TO BE HAPPY AND FULFILLED -  HE WANTS TO BE TRANSFORMED INTO A FEMALE AND HAVE HIS PENIS CUT OFF.

AND THE LEFT SEES NOTHING WRONG HERE.

WHY DOES THE POSTMODERN LEFT HATE THE USA AND THE WEST?

SIMPLE:

IN THE TWISTED LITTLE PROPAGANDIZED MIND OF THE POSTMODERN LEFTIST, AMERICA - AND THE WEST THAT WOULD FALL WITHOUT AMERICA'S SUPPORT - IS RESPONSIBLE FOR:

1. MOST OF THE WORLD'S GENOCIDE - ESPECIALLY RACIAL GENOCIDE; 
2. SEXUAL REPRESSION;
3. CATASTROPHIC GLOBAL WARMING;
4. AND POVERTY - ESPECIALLY THIRD WORLD POVERTY.

ALL OF THESE ARE DEMONSTRABLY, FACTUALLY FALSE - PROOF HERE.

POSTMODERNISTS WILL ARGUE THAT THEY LOVE AMERICA. BUT THEY REALLY ONLY LOVE AMERICA THE WAY A NAGGING BITCHY WIFE "LOVES" THE HUSBAND SHE CAN'T STAND AND TRIES TO TRANSFORM.

THEY DON'T LOVE AMERICA FOR WHAT AMERICA WAS FOUNDED UPON, HAS ACCOMPLISHED OR REPRESENTS. 

THEY HATE THOSE THINGS ABOUT AMERICA. 

THEY LOVE THE BOUNTY AMERICA LABORED TO BRING FORTH AND THEY WANT TO GET THEIR FILTHY STINKIN' PAWS ON IT SO THEY CAN DOLE IT OUT TO THEIR FACTIONS.

UPDATE: 

Addendum: SEX CHANGE SURGERY AND THE GRAMSCIAN AGENDA

Like Lysenkoist science, the postmodern assertion that the choice of male or female sexual partners is rigidly fixed at a genetic level, but that gender is infinitely transformative, that gay men cannot turn back to straight, but that men can become women and women can become men, makes no logical sense. It makes even less scientific sense.  

But it makes perfect political sense. 

The left’s version of the old racist “one-drop rule” that treated anyone with even one drop of black blood as black is to treat anyone with even the loosest claim to minority status as a minority and to mandate the irrevocable nature of that minority status.  

That is why Obama is black, rather than half- white, why Elizabeth Warren can be a Cherokee and why a straight man can become gay, but a gay man cannot become straight. [AND WHY GOV. CHRISTIE FELT HE HAD TO OUTLAW "GAY CONVERSION THERAPY".]

It is why a man can become a woman or a woman can become a man and gain an entirely new transgender minority status. 

The scientific principle at work here is the conservation of minority status.  

The left’s policies are meant to diminish the size of the majority and enlarge the size and number of minorities. 

Political diversity when applied to science logically leads to immutable homosexuality and mutable gender. It leads to a construct of race governed by a politically correct version of the one-drop rule in which racial identification always trends toward minority status, rather than majority status.  

The science is bad, but the political calculation is impeccable.  

Biology is just as irrelevant in 2013 America as it was in 1923 Russia.  

How the human body works doesn’t matter. How the body politic ought to work is of obsessive importance.  

The individual is a metaphor for the collective. 

The power of the state to transform the individual from male to female is a metaphor for its power to transform the entire nation through the transformation of language. 

In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it,” George Orwell wrote in 1984. “It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.

WHAT'S THE POLITICAL MOTIVATION OF THE POSTMODERN LEFT'S EMBRACE OF TRANSGENDERISM? Simple:

By dividing the majority into a series of tiny minorities, they diminish the ability to oppose them, AND BECAUSE - AS FAVORED MINORITIES THEY BECOME PART OF THE LEFTIST COALITION QUALIFYING FOR THE PLETHORA OF DOLED-OUT GOODIES AND SPECIAL RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES THE LEFT HAS MADE AVAILABLE AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE. 

"Gay marriage" actually has a similarly POLITICAL goal: 

 "Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose of Battle is to Destroy Marriage"

And then there's this:

Children’s Television Network Launches Transsexual Superhero Show…

The postmodernist's Gramscian Agenda doesn't stop there, either: 

Gov’t-Run School Curriculum… Children Forced to Kiss Same Gender In Simulated Homosexuality (Video)

This is tantamount to the enforcement of perversion and goes beyond even the nightmarish world Antony Burgess imagined in "The Wanting Seed."

BOTTOM-LINE - ALSO FROM DAN GREENFIELD:

... why stop at gender when you can also do species? There are people who believe that their true identity is that of an animal. And who is to say that species isn’t in the mind, just like gender is in the mind?

This isn’t just a thought-experimentor satire. It’s reality.

Species dysphoria is the equivalent of Gender dysphoria. Mentally ill persons with gender dysphoria are fashionably diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder. There is as of yet no Species Identity Disorder, but that is no doubt coming.

Like Trannies, Transpecies Americans create special pronouns for themselves and insist that refusing to pretend that they’re cats or wolves is a hate crime.

Like most newly minted civil rights groups, Trannies are intolerant of Transpecies Americans accusing them of only pretending to think that they’re cats and playing the old, “How dare you compare your pain to my pain and your imaginary identity to my imaginary identity” game.

Men who claim that they were really born women based on their personality insist that the idea of men who claim they were born cats is just nuts.

“Trying to legitimize your “species dysphoria” is despicable and insensitive to people with gender dysphoria,” one site says. “Denial of a biological link to sexuality/gender-identity is harmful to all queer (LGBTQI) people.”

Identity is apparently only in the mind, until you encounter people whose identity is also in the mind and make your mind identity look stupid.

ADDITIONAL READING:

WHY THE LEFT WANTS TO DESTROY THE FAMILY

 EXCERPT:

 As the Gramsci biography puts it:

Gramsci stated that, in the West, bourgeois cultural values were tied toChristianity, and therefore much of his polemic against hegemonic culture is aimed at religious norms and values [umph added - Relipaundit]. He was impressed by the power Roman Catholicism had over men's minds and the care the Church had taken to prevent an excessive gap developing between the religion of the learned and that of the less educated. Gramsci believed that it was Marxism's task to marry the purely intellectual critique of religion found inRenaissance humanism to the elements of the Reformation that had appealed to the masses. For Gramsci, Marxism could supersede religion only if it met people's spiritual needs, and to do so people would have to recognise it as an expression of their own experience.

The destruction of the family will condemn millions of children to dysfunctional outcomes. The left would sacrifice those children - future drop-outs, wards of the State, prisoners, runaways, and suicides - in order to create a society in which everyone is essentially institutionalized from birth to the grave, and in which every decision affecting everyone's daily life is made by a bureaucratic elite and enforced by violence.

For further details, see The Road to Serfdom, the must-read and re-read book by the economist F. A. Hayek.

NEWS FROM SODOM AND GOMMORAH

SODOMITES AND GOMMORAHCANOS WEREN'T SINFUL OR DEBAUCHED; THEY WERE JUST TOLERANT AND INTO DIVERSITY.

THOUGH, I THINK EVEN THEY WOULD BE SHOCKED BY SOME OF THE TRANSGENDER STUFF REPORTED NONCHALANTLY IN TODAY'S NEWS; HERE ARE A FEW OF THE RECENT HEADLINES:

• CNN: Former Navy SEAL comes out as transgender

• ABCNEWS: Transgender Candidate Could Become a First in NYC

• NPR: Transgender Youth Battle The Odds

• POLICYMIC: Meet the 15-Year-Old Transgender Teen in Maine Leading the Fight For Equal Rights

• CBS: Calif. Bill Would Allow Transgender Students To Have Equal Access To School Programs, Facilities

WHAT'S NEXT? I SHUDDER TO THINK... MAYBE.... REASSIGNING SOME PEOPLE AS SOME OTHER ANIMAL SPECIES, (AFTER SOME ARTFUL SURGERY/MUTILATION), AND BESTIALITY, I GUESS...

DON'T SMIRK AND CALL ME A RIGHT-WINGNUT; IT'S ALSO A HEADLINE FROM TODAY'S NEWS:

Waukesha man argues constitutional right of goat love, charges filed 

A 41-year-old Waukesha man was charged last week with allegedly arguing (loudly) on behalf of one of America’s lesser known freedoms: the right of a man to love a goat.

WE'RE NOT ON A SLIPPERY SLOPE.

WE'RE DEEP IN A CESSPOOL OF AMORALITY.

JUST SAYING....

AND ANOTHER THING: ITS NO ACCIDENT THAT ALL THE LEFT-WING DOMINATED MEDIA OUTLETS IN THE LIST ABOVE ARE PUSHING THE TRANSGENDER ITEMS.

IT'S THE NEXT ITEM IN THE POSTMODERN LEFT'S GRAMSCIAN AGENDA.

ALINSKY, CLOWARD & PIVEN AND GRAMSCI: THE AUTHORS OF THE STRATEGIES BEING USED BY THE POSTMODERN LEFT TO DESTORY WESTERN CIVILIZATION IN ORDER TO REPLACE IT WITH A SOCIALIST, SEXUALLY PERMISSIVE NANNYSTATE.

AND THEY'RE WINNING.

SIGH...

MSNBC'S LARRY O'DONNELL PROVES CONTEMPORARY SOCIALISTS PERSIST IN ATTACKING OUR JUDEO-CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION DESPITE THE FACT SOCIALISM HAS KILLED MORE THAT ANY IDEOLOGY EXCEPT FOR ISLAM

LAWRENCE O'DONNELL CRANKS IT UP A NOTCH.

EXCERPT:

Lawrence O'Donnell has a recommendation for President Obama on Inauguration Day: get rid of the Bible. 

On Thursday, the MSNBC host reacted to news that Louie Giglio — the pastor selected to deliver the benediction at Obama's inauguration — had withdrawn from the ceremony over an anti-gay sermon he gave in the 1990s. O'Donnell said that Giglio had been "quoting the Bible," and that "homosexuality is a sin in the Bible." 

He guffawed at the White House statement about its search for Giglio's replacement. "In other words, we will ensure that whoever delivers the benediction rejects the same parts of the Bible that President Obama rejects and most Democrats reject, even though every word of the Bible is the word of God,” O’Donnell said. 

“As I've pointed out... no one accepts all of the teachings of the Bible," he continued. "Still, the president, following one of our most absurdest traditions in the government that invented the separation of church and state, will put his hand on this book filled with things he does not believe — filled with things that no one in the United States of America believes — and with his hand on this book he will recite the oath of office."

O'DONNELL AND MOST OF THE PEOPLE ON THE POSTMODERN LEFT HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED TO BELIEVE THAT WESTERN RELIGION HAS BEEN AND CONTINUES TO BE A REPRESSIVE FORCE IN SOCIETY, AND NOT A PRO-SOCIAL ONE.

FROM A PREVIOUS POST ON THE LEFT'S WAR ON RELIGION:

THE POSTMODERN LEFT'S WAR ON RELIGION IS PART OF THEIR GRAMSCIAN AGENDA - PART OF THEIR "CULTURE WAR"  STRATEGY TO DEMOLISH EVERYTHING THAT STANDS IN THE WAY OF THEIR "UTOPIAN NANNYSTATE".

• THIS GRAMSCIAN AGENDA IS THE ROOT CAUSE OF THEIR OIKOPHOBIA - THEIR HATRED OF OUR CIVILIZATION, AND XENOPHILIA FOR ANYTHING NON-WESTERN.

• THEY HAVE MANAGED TO CAPTURE MANY GENERATIONS OF IDEALISTIC YOUTHS BY CONVINCING THEM THE WEST IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL IN THE WORLD - WHICH DOVETAILS NICELY WITH THE JIHADIST AGENDA.

THEY FALSELY BLAME THE WEST FOR:

• THIRD WORLD POVERTY;
• AN IMPENDING (AND IMAGINARY) GLOBAL CLIMATE CATASTROPHE; 
• ALL SEXUAL REPRESSION - AND FOR PERPETRATING THE "FALSE NOTION OF 'NORMALCY'"; 
• AND MOST OF HISTORY'S GENOCIDE.

EVERY NOTION IS FACTUALLY FALSE.

(1) THIRD WORLD POVERTY IS A RESULT OF A LACK OF INDUSTRIALIZATION - ITSELF CAUSED BY LEFTIST INDUSTRIAPHOBIA.

(2) CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL, AND THERE IS NO WARMING CURRENTLY OR IN THE LAST DECADE THAT IS OUTSIDE THE WARMING/COOLING RANGES IN GEOLOGICAL HISTORY.

(3) THERE IS SUCH A THING AS NORMAL AND DEVIANT - NO MATTER HOW HARD THE POSTMODERNISTS TRY TO DUMB DEVIANCY DOWN. AND SEXUAL LIBERTINAGE IS NOT LIBERTARIAN.

(4) MOST OF THE WEST'S GENOCIDE WAS PERPETRATED BY LEFTISTS IN THE 20TH CENTURY - THEY KILLED MORE PEOPLE THAN JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY KILLED IN THE PRECEDING 19 CENTURIES ... COMBINED! 

AND ISLAM KILLED MORE PEOPLE IN THE LAST 14 CENTURIES THAN LEFTISM AND JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY COMBINED!!


WHEN THE LEFT ATTACKS JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY, THEY ARE FACTUALLY AND MORALLY WRONG.

NEVER FORGET THESE 2 THINGS:

1. SOCIALISM KILLED MORE PEOPLE IN THE 20TH CENTURY THAN JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY KILLED IN THE PRECEDING 20 CENTURIES.
2. MARXISM HAS BEEN MORE THOROUGHLY REFUTED, DEBUNKED AND DERIDED AS A RECIPE FOR PRO-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR THAN THE BIBLE.

ANYONE WHO TELLS YOU SOCIALISM IS MORAL OR MORE MORAL THAT CAPITALISM IS A DUPE.

THE WEDDING PHOTO THAT SAYS EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE POSTMODERNIST ATTACK ON JUDEO-CHRISTIAN VALUES AND TRADITIONS - AND ON WESTERN CIVILIZATION

I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST THE PEOPLE IN THIS WEDDING PHOTO - ONE FEATURED PROMINENTLY TODAY IN THE NYTIMES WEDDING SECTION:

TWO MEN MARRIED BY A FEMALE RABBI.

I WONDER:

WILL THEY SERVE SHRIMP COCKTAIL AND HAM AND CHEESE SANDWICHES AT THE RECEPTION? (NON-KOSHER FOODS)

DID THE FEMALE "RABBI" WEAR A CROSS AND RECITE BUDDHIST OR HINDU CHANTS, TOO?

SERIOUSLY:

GAY MEN WHO WANT TO ESTABLISH LIFETIME BONDS HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO SO WITHOUT MARRIAGE.

I AM FINE WITH THAT - AS WERE BJ CLINTON AND OBAMA UNTIL A FEW MONTHS AGO,

THIS IN NOT ABOUT GAYPHOBIA - OR WHATEVER THEY CALL IT.

THIS IS ABOUT THE GRAMSCIAN AGENDA:

THE POLITICAL EFFORT TO ESTABLISH GAY MARRIAGE IS PART OF THE GRAMSCIAN EFFORT TO DEMOLISH THE TRADITIONAL INSTITUTIONS THAT UNDERPIN OUR CIVILIZATION, (THE FAMILY AND THE CHURCH), SO THAT THEY CAN BE REPLACED WITH A SOCIALIST STATE -- A SEXUALLY PERMISSIVE NANNYSTATE.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO STOP THEM.

BUT IF OBAMA IS RE-ELECTED IT MIGHT BE SOON.

VOTE ACCORDINGLY.

VOTE ROMNEY-RYAN.



(NOTE:

A FEMALE CAN NO MORE BE A RABBI AND MEN NO MORE MARRY EACH OTHER THAN A WHITE MAN BE ORDAINED A FISH AND A BLACK WOMAN TRANSFORMED BY LAW INTO A BANJO.

AS LINCOLN FAMOUSLY SAID:

CALLING A DOG'S TAIL A LEG DOESN'T MAKE IT A LEG.)

NYTIMES CONTINUES ITS WAR ON RELIGION

THE POSTMODERN LEFT'S WAR ON RELIGION CONTINUES - ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE NYTIMES - AND ITS MAGAZINE: "FROM THE MAGAZINE - From Bible-Belt Pastor to Atheist Leader"

The new heroes within the secular movement are coming from unlikely places — like the pulpit. Above, Jerry DeWitt, an atheist, at a church where he once preached. 

... Not long ago, the atheist movement was the preserve of a few eccentric gadflies like Madalyn Murray O’Hair, whose endless lawsuits helped earn her the title “the most hated woman in America.” But over the past decade it has matured into something much larger and less cranky. In March of this year, some 20,000 people marched through a cold drizzle at the “Reason Rally” in Washington, billed as a political debut for the movement. A string of best-selling atheist polemics by the “four horsemen” — Hitchens and Dawkins, as well as Sam Harris and Daniel Dennett — has provided new intellectual fuel. Secular-themed organizations and clubs have begun to permeate small-town America and college campuses, helping to foot the bill for bus and billboard ad campaigns with messages like “Are You Good Without God? Millions Are.” 

The reasons for this secular revival are varied, but it seems clear that the Internet has helped, and many younger atheists cite the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks as a watershed moment of disgust with religious zealotry in any form.

THE NYTIMES - AND THE LEFT - ARE DELIBERATELY CONFLATING ATHEISM WITH SECULARISM TO MAKE IT SEEM AS IF ANTI-RELIGIOUS VIEWS ARE AS MUCH PART OF OUR NATIONAL HERITAGE AS SECULARISM IS.

THAT'S BS.

OUR NATION WAS FOUNDED FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM - AND FREEDOM TO BE RELIGIOUS, NOT FOR FREEDOM FROM RELIGION.

And when they write this crap -  " ... many younger atheists cite the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks as a watershed moment of disgust with religious zealotry in any form... " - they make a false moral equivalence between all religions.

ALL RELIGIONS ARE NOT THE SAME - NOT FUNCTIONALLY, NOT STRUCTURALLY  AND NOT MORALLY.

EQUATING JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY WITH ISLAMISM OR PAGANISM OR BUDDHISM IS INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST AND FACTUALLY INCORRECT.

THE POSTMODERN LEFT'S WAR ON RELIGION IS PART OF THEIR GRAMSCIAN AGENDA - PART OF THEIR "CULTURE WAR"  STRATEGY TO DEMOLISH EVERYTHING THAT STANDS IN THE WAY OF THEIR "UTOPIAN NANNYSTATE".

• THIS GRAMSCIAN AGENDA IS THE ROOT CAUSE OF THEIR OIKOPHOBIA - THEIR HATRED OF OUR CIVILIZATION, AND XENOPHILIA FOR ANYTHING NON-WESTERN.

• THEY HAVE MANAGED TO CAPTURE MANY GENERATIONS OF IDEALISTIC YOUTHS BY CONVINCING THEM THE WEST IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL IN THE WORLD - WHICH DOVETAILS NICELY WITH THE JIHADIST AGENDA.

THEY FALSELY BLAME THE WEST FOR:

• THIRD WORLD POVERTY;
• AN IMPENDING (AND IMAGINARY) GLOBAL CLIMATE CATASTROPHE; 
• ALL SEXUAL REPRESSION - AND FOR PERPETRATING THE "FALSE NOTION OF 'NORMALCY'"; 
• AND MOST OF HISTORY'S GENOCIDE.

EVERY NOTION IS FACTUALLY FALSE.

(1) THIRD WORLD POVERTY IS A RESULT OF A LACK OF INDUSTRIALIZATION - ITSELF CAUSED BY LEFTIST INDUSTRIAPHOBIA.

(2) CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL, AND THERE IS NO WARMING CURRENTLY OR IN THE LAST DECADE THAT IS OUTSIDE THE WARMING/COOLING RANGES IN GEOLOGICAL HISTORY.

(3) THERE IS SUCH A THING AS NORMAL AND DEVIANT - NO MATTER HOW HARD THE POSTMODERNISTS TRY TO DUMB DEVIANCY DOWN. AND SEXUAL LIBERTINAGE IS NOT LIBERTARIAN.

(4) MOST OF THE WEST'S GENOCIDE WAS PERPETRATED BY LEFTISTS IN THE 20TH CENTURY - THEY KILLED MORE PEOPLE THAN JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY KILLED IN THE PRECEDING 19 CENTURIES ... COMBINED! 

AND ISLAM KILLED MORE PEOPLE IN THE LAST 14 CENTURIES THAN LEFTISM AND JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY COMBINED!!


WE MUST USE THESE FACTS (EASILY FOOTNOTED AND FREQUENTLY POSTED ON IN THIS BLOG) TO DEMOLISH THE APPEAL OF LEFTISTS TO YOUNG IDEALISTS AND TO NEUTRALIZE THE LEFT'S ABILITY TO SHAPE EVENTS.

IT'S OUR PARAMOUNT TASK.

• IF WE WANT TO DEFEAT GLOBAL JIHAD AND ELIMINATE GLOBAL POVERTY, THEN WE MUST FIRST DEFEAT THE POSTMODERN LEFT.

LET'S START THIS NOVEMBER BY DEFEATING OBAMA - THE FIRST POSTMODERN LEFTIST PRESIDENT.

ANOTHER PROMO FOR THE GRAMSCIAN AGENDA FROM THE NYTIMES

MORE GRAMSCIAN CRAP FROM THE NYTIMES:

FROM THE MAGAZINE

What’s So Bad About a Boy in a Dress?

By RUTH PADAWER

Many couples now reject corrective therapy and take a new approach to parenting gender-fluid children.

THE POSTMODERN LEFT WANTS A WORLD IN WHICH "EVERYTHING IS NORMAL/NOTHING IS NORMAL"...

AND THERE IS NO CHURCH, NO FAMILY - ONLY A SOCIALLY PERMISSIVE NANNYSTATE THAT PAYS FOR EDUCATION, HEALTHCARE, AND PENSIONS, AND ALLOWS PEOPLE TO BE LIBERTINES.

UPDATE: WE SCOOPED HOT AIR BY A DAY ON THIS.

WHY IS THERE NO “Gay Kiss-In at the Mosque” day?

FUNNY POST HERE: Gay “Kiss-In” at the Mosque Day: August 7, 2012:

Homosexual activists declared August 7, 2012 as “Kiss-In at the Mosque” day in an attempt to bring attention to Islamic Homophobia. Same sex couples across the nation will be “kissing” in front of mosques in an effort to silence the “hate-speech” and “homosexual genocide” practiced by Muslims worldwide. 

Inspired by the Chick fil-A “Kiss-In” 

VIA PATRIOT UPDATE.

WE KNOW WHY THE LEFT DOESN'T MENTION ISLAMO=HOMOPHOBIA BUT ATTACKS CHICK-FIL-A AND CHRISTIANS:

BECAUSE THEY'RE COWARDS - BECAUSE THEY KNOW MUSLIMS LIKE FARRAKHAN AND THOS IN SAUDI AND IRAN WOULD REACT VIOLENTLY IF THEY TRIED ANY OF THAT CRAP.

THAT'S WHY THEY "RESPECT" MUSLIMS MORE THAN THEY DO CHRISTIANS.

AND ANOTHER THING:

THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED IN BRINGING DOWN TRADITIONAL VALUES AND TRADITIONAL INSTITUTIONS HERE - ( WITH THEIR GRAMSCIAN AGENDA, IN ORDER THAT THEY MIGHT BE REPLACED WITH A SOCIALIST AND PERMISSIVE NANNYSTATE) - THAN THEY ARE INTERESTED IN PERSONAL LIBERTY PER SE OR UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS.

THE KISS-IN AT CHICK-FIL-A AND THE THREATS LIBERAL POLITICIANS MADE AGAINST CHICK-FIL-A ARE PART AND PARCEL OF THE OBAMACARE'S ATTACK AGAINST CHRISTIANS VIS A VIS THE CONTRACEPTION  MANDATE.

THE LEFT WANTS TO FORCE CHRISTIANS TO ABANDON THEIR CORE BELIEFS AND ADOPT THE CORE BELIEFS OF THE LEFT, AND THEY WILL TRY TO ERADICATE CHRISTIAN CHURCHES THAT DO NOT.

THE LEFT'S GRAMSCIAN-POSTMODERNIST AGENDA IS WHY THE NYTIMES LOST ANOTHER $88 MILLION

The NYTIMES lost another $88 million this quarter.

Do they wonder why?

It's because they promote a Gramscian agenda that may be in tune with the chic degenerati who work at the NYTIMES  - and the few who still read it, but not the overwhelming majority of people who live in the USA.

EXAMPLE FROM TODAY'S PAPER a big article celebrating a transgender "exhibition" with a slide show (excerpt):

DREA EBONY was clearly feeling it. Who wouldn’t marvel at the way she flipped her hair in a circle and kicked her leg out like a Rockette as she sauntered up and down that runway in her shiny gold pants and white tank top, as cheers from the crowd grew louder and louder.

Time and time again, young kids on the transgender spectrum had graced stages almost identical to this one and been sent packing. But Drea Ebony, 18 and visiting from Pittsburgh, was different. She was a star. And she was going to prove it.

With the lights dimmed and the music blaring, Ms. Ebony flipped back in a handspring-like maneuver that ended with her landing on her back like a breakdancer. She then sprang back up, striking a pose or two or three.

“Ten. Ten. Ten. Ten. Tens across the board,” the M.C. Dashaun Wesley boomed as judges held up their scores.

Moments later, Ms. Ebony had her trophy in hand, the victor in the category of Female Figure Vogue, beating a host of other contestants from houses like LaBeija, Mugler and Evisu. “I’ve never been at an event this big,” Ms. Ebony said. “I think this is definitely the biggest one.”

Back in the 1980s, voguing and drag balls flourished in gay New York, with a brief surge in the early ’90s brought on by Madonna, Malcolm McLaren and the film “Paris Is Burning,” which chronicled the lives of several of the subculture’s most colorful inhabitants. But first came AIDS and then came hedge funds. And so the scene receded to the shadows, returning to smaller venues in Harlem and the South Bronx.

But then last month, e-mail began circulating with the news that the Xtravas (as they are known in drag ball parlance) were bringing the party to XL, a slicker-than-vinyl gay club near Times Square, in an attempt to widen the audience again.

And judging by the turnout last Sunday at the House of Xtravaganza’s 30th anniversary celebration, the effort has worked.

IT'S CLEAR WHOSE SIDE THE NYTIMES IS ON - AND IT'S NOT THE SIDE OF NORMAL PEOPLE.

IT'S THE SIDE THAT SAYS THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS NORMAL AND THAT DEVIANCY IS FINE.

IT'S THE POSTMODERNIST SIDE - AND THAT'S WHAT IS HURTING THE NYTIMES PROFITS AND RUINING OUR CIVILIZATION FROM THE INSIDE.

THAT STORY WAS YESTERDAY'S NEWS.

TODAY, THEY ATTACKED NORMALCY AND THE WEST AGAIN - WITH A FRONT PAGE STORY AND A BIG SLIDE SHOW:

AT first glance the opening and dinner at the Allegra LaViola Gallery on the Lower East Side on Wednesday night looked like any other New York art event. There were stylish people from Brooklyn and Manhattan, in dark clothing and notable shoes. Photographs lined the walls. Thematically appropriate mood music — in this case, live drums — came from a corner of the gallery. Laura Ginn, the artist being celebrated, wore a one-shoulder, one-of-a-kind dress. 

There was a bit of a stench coming off it, though. Ms. Ginn’s gown was made of rat pelts, 300 of them, that she had tanned and sewn together. Their tails encircled her abdomen; two rat faces met on her right shoulder. “I thought that was cute,” she said, and laughed. “They’re kind of kissing. I do anthropomorphize them sometimes.” 

Ms. Ginn, 28, has made working with animals her métier since she graduated with an M.F.A. in photography from Cranbrook Academy in Michigan in 2010. 

...Twenty people, mostly friends of Ms. Ginn or the gallery owner, Ms. LaViola, nibbled on goat cheese bruschetta topped with rat leg tenderloin, and rat-pork terrine encircled with beef fat, prepared by a chef after much trial and error with his proteins. 

The rats were shipped from a United States Department of Agriculture-approved West Coast processor that supplies pet owners with humanely killed, individually flash-frozen rodents, in classifications ranging from “jumbo” to “fuzzy.” 

Seventy five rats were skinned and cooked — and broiled and smoked and grilled — for the dinner, and most guests paid $100 each to attend, signing a liability waiver, some not entirely willingly.

THEY WERE SERVED ON OLD GLORY:

CHECK OUT THE SLIDE SHOW.

 IT'S DEVIANT.


AND THE NYTIMES CELEBRATES IT.

AND THAT'S WHY THEY LOSE MILLIONS.

AND DEFINING DEVIANCY DOWN IS WHY OUR CULTURE IS DECLINING.

THAT'S WHAT THE POSTMODERN LEFT WANTS.

IT'S THE CULTURE WAR: 


ONE ONE SIDE IT'S WESTERN CIVILIZATION AGAINST DEVIANCY; ON THE OTHER SIDE IT'S WESTERN CIVILIZATION AGAINST JIHADISM AND SHARIA.


WHOSE SIDE ARE YOU ON?