* * * PROSPERITY IS A BY-PRODUCT OF LIBERTY * * * PEACE IS A BY-PRODUCT OF VICTORY * * *

Saturday, September 30, 2006

NIE: WE'RE "CREATING" JIHADIS?

Thanks to Reliapundit for bringing me on board. Here's my insight for the day:

The NIE report that the Dems and their media spokesmen are getting so worked up about goes wrong by presenting data through the lens of a particular moral outlook, which clearly is by no means the only one, and as I see it is the incorrect one. These people are data collectors, they're not moral philosophers.

Specifically, to say that the NIE shows the war is "creating" jihadis is no different from looking at social science data showing a correlation between crime and poverty, and saying that poverty therefore "causes" crime. Wrong, it's just data, and the moral judgment you draw from that data is your own.

And of course, my view is that people are morally responsible for their own choices. If someone looks at a picture of a Burger King ice cream cone and sees something which justifies murder, I don't blame Burger King for that, I blame him. But that's just me. Read my entire outburst here.

BUSH'S GOAL - TO TRANSFORM THE ARAB MIDDLE EAST - IS WORKING

DAILY STAR (which is an Arab publication; via RCP):
[According to Zogby polling in several Arab nations]: An Arab middle class with global values was emerging, and Arab populations seemed to be moving toward greater identification with their individual countries, rather than primarily expressing wider pan-Arab or pan-Islamic sentiments. ... one reason for this change was "disappointment and disillusionment with the results of pan-Arab policies and attitudes, ...
Another reason is obviously Bush's forward-leaning pro-democracy/human rights policies.

I hope the polling data is accurate, and that we have the patience and resoluteness to see this transformation through to the end. (We mustn't bail out on this part of our strategy in the GWOT, nor should we bet the house on it, either.) Because it will take time, as in DECADES, like the Cold War. This struggle is at least as important, too: We need to liberate all our brothers and sisters everywhere from the archaic ideologies and vestigial tyrannies which prevent them from achieving their innate universal human rights. That's what "neocons" FDR and JFK believed; it's still just, right and true.

NOTE: Pastorius is growing more restless - with good reason; SEE THE NEXT POST. I'm arguing for more patience, but I am not arguing that we must rely solely on this part of our strategy. We can and should do more to foment more rapid change in the region:
Like demanding an end to all legal misogyny in the region, and an end to polygamy and endogamy.
These archaic inhumane practices are the foundational breeding ground for the enemy's capability for constant hostility and unspeakable cruelty to anyone they consider an infidel. When the most of the enemy's families are based on free choice, love, and respect for women, then they will raise children who love life as much as we do. And then, they will hate terror as much as we do, too.

Waiting For Moderate Muslims Is Like Waiting For Godot
In recent weeks, I have been making the same statement over and over ad nauseum. Here it is:
There is not a single Islamic political organization, media outlet, academic institution, or government, of any appreciable size, anywhere in the world, which is moderate.
Those who read me are probably getting sick of hearing it. Perhaps, wondering if I have lost my edge, my ability to come up with new ideas on a daily basis. Maybe I have, because I confess, I am definately stuck on this idea. It seems to me there is no greater outrage in this world than this one simple truth.

I wonder whether many readers believe me when I write this, so on occasion I challenge those who read me to come up with one example of a moderate Muslim organization. I have yet to have a single commenter even attempt to rise to the challenge. And, if any do, I am extremely confident that I will be able to prove, in short order, that the organization is not at all moderate.

And, if there are any who do not believe me (for it is an extreme statement to make, even if true), well then, here is a Muslim who is saying the same thing as I (from the Toronto Sun):
In a recent column, Michael Coren, my colleague here at the Sun, demanded Muslims apologize for wrongs too numerous to list. Coren is right. I, as a Muslim, apologize without equivocation or reservation for the terrible crimes -- small and big -- committed by Muslims against non-Muslims and against Muslims, as in Darfur, who are weak and easy prey to those who hold power in the name of Islam.

I imagine, however, Coren is not seeking an apology from a person of Muslim faith such as I, who maintains no rank and cannot speak on behalf of the institutionalized world of Islam. Like many others who share his frustration and legitimate anger, Coren is asking to hear a contrite voice from within institutionalized Islam -- to repent for Muslim misconduct, past and present, that is indefensible by any standard of civility and decency, and seek forgiveness.
But Coren and others might well wait indefinitely for such an apology from those representatives of institutionalized Islam convinced of their own righteousness, even as they are engineers of a civilization's wreckage and prosper in it by the art of bullying.

Oh, we will not wait indefinitely. Of that, I can assure you. The problem for moderates who are Muslim is that we are getting sick of waiting. And the day that we become completely fed up will be a very sad day for all of humanity.

ENEMY'S IN-HOUSE PROPAGANDA MACHINE - AS DESCRIBED BY THEIR INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTOR

NYTIMES:
Abu Omar ... began distributing the latest video by Al Qaeda, alerting friends and occasionally adding commentary. “We are the energy behind the path to jihad,” Abu Omar said proudly. “Just like the jihadis reached their target on Sept. 11, we will reach ours through the Internet.” Abu Omar, 28, is part of an increasingly sophisticated network of contributors and discussion leaders helping to wage Al Qaeda’s battle for Muslim hearts and minds. ...

In recent years, Al Qaeda has formed a special media production division called Al Sahab to produce videos about leaders like Mr. bin Laden and Mr. Zawahri, terrorism experts say. ... Al Qaeda has been turning itself ... into a propaganda organization,” ... “They now appear to be focused on putting out disinformation and projecting the strength of the mujahedeen....

... Though he does not appear to be directly connected to Al Qaeda, Abu Omar does seem to be on a direct e-mail list for groups sympathetic to Al Qaeda, making him a link in a chain that spreads the organization’s propaganda using code and special software to circumvent official scrutiny of their Internet activity.
Er um.... "putting out disinformation and projecting the strength of the mujahedeen" and "a link in a chain that spreads the organization’s propaganda..." Well er that sounds just like THE NEW YORK TIMES!

INDIA: PAKISTAN'S ISI BEHIND MUMBAI BOMBINGS

BBC:
Pakistan's intelligence agency was behind the train blasts in Mumbai in July that killed 186 people... The attacks were planned by the ISI and carried out by the Islamist militant group Lashkar-e-Toiba ... Mumbai's police chief said.

NYTIMES:
Pakistan's Directorate of Inter Services Intelligence, or ISI, the country's top spy agency, began planning the attacks in March and later provided training to those who carried out the bombings in Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Pakistan has in the past denied any involvement in the attacks and it was not immediately clear what implications the revelations would have on the fragile peace process between the nuclear-armed neighbors.
Pakistan is a fragile ally with nukes. If the bad elements of their society and the ISI get control of the govvernment, then they'd become - overnight - what we fear Iran becoming: a nuclear armed jihadoterror state. We would have to immediately preemptively neutralize their nukes - with whatever it would take. I assume the plans for this are in a lockbox in the Pentagon, and I'm glad Bush has the key and not a Democrat dove.

DANIEL ELLSBERG STILL HAS SOME JUICE

The man famous for leaking The Pentagon Papers has a piece in the October issue of Harpers in which he calls on government insiders to leak information on any war plans the U.S. government has for Iran. This call to arms from Ellsberg was "leaked" to Editor & Publisher a few weeks ago. Then just in the past week we get a leak from somewhere in the government of the National Intelligence Estimate which seemed to say that the Iraq War is hurting the War on Terror. Okay, it's not exactly what Ellsberg was calling for...he said Iran, not Iraq, but it's close enough. It may be a coincidence, or it may be that the Vietnam era traitor has some sway with the traitors of the modern era.

Friday, September 29, 2006

EVEN AS "ANTI-WAR" CRITICS MOVE GOALPOSTS, BUSH SCORES

BUSH (speaking to ROA):
... from the beginning, our actions in Afghanistan have had a clear purpose... And from the beginning, the American people have heard the critics say we're failing -- but their reasons keep changing.

In the first days of Operation Enduring Freedom, the critics warned that we were heading toward a "quagmire." And then when the Taliban fell, and operations began in Iraq, the critics held up the multinational coalition in Afghanistan as a model, and said it showed that everything we were doing in Iraq was wrong.

And now some of the critics who praised the multinational coalition we built in Afghanistan claim that the country is in danger of failing because we don't have enough American troops there.

...Iraq is not the reason the terrorists are at war against us. ... This argument buys into the enemy's propaganda that the terrorists attack us because we're provoking them. I want to remind the American citizens that we were not in Iraq on September the 11th, 2001. ... You do not create terrorism by fighting terrorism.

If that ever becomes the mind set of the policymakers in Washington, it means we'll go back to the old days of waiting to be attacked and then respond. Our most important duty is to protect the American people from a future attack, and the way to do so is to stay on the offense against the terrorists.
MORE EXCERPTS IN COMMENTS SECTION...

The American Spirit Vs. The Jihadi Spirit
They shoot little girls in the head and leave them to die. American soldiers give them medical care, and try to help them sleep by holding them through the night.

A picture is worth a thousand words, indeed:
"Got a tough, but heartwarming story and a picture of John Gebhardt in Iraq. For those that did not know John, he was our former Med Group Chief.

Anyway, his wife talked with mine last evening and sent this picture. Mindy related that this little girl’s entire family was executed…they intended to execute her also and shot her in the head…but they failed to kill her.

She was cared for by John’s hospital and healing up, but has been crying and moaning. The nurses said John is the only one she seems to calm down with, so John has spent the last four nights holding her while they both sleep in that chair. "
You will never hear of the American Armed Forces following a policy of rounding up families and executing them for following the wrong ideology. It doesn't happen, and it will never happen.

But, if you read the news, you will see that Islamofascist Jihadis do this on a daily basis, killing men, women and children, as a policy, for failing to adhere strongly enough to their Islamofascist ideology.

That's "The American Spirit vs The Jihadi Spirit" in a nutshell.

CARTER - AMERICA'S WORST PRESIDENT EVER - CARES MORE ABOUT INTERNATIONAL OPINION THAN THE USA
brunch/lunckunch or dinner on saturday.







DHIMMI CARTER:
Former President Carter is urging northern Nevadans to elect his son, Jack, to the Senate to help combat a Bush administration he says has brought "international disgrace" to the country.
Sheesh. I remember Carter. I voted for the creep (back in the days when I was a Leftie more afraid of Reagan than the USSR!). Now I can clearly deduce that he was a TOTAL DISASTER as POTUS, and chiefly responsible for all the serious problems we face: Carter let the Shah fall and ushered in the Ayatollah - and the era of jihadoterror. Carter allowed the USSR to march into Afghanistan, and Central America. Carter told Americans to lower our expectations and wear sweaters. Carter was a freakin' failure who was wrong then and is wrong now.

And now he's arguing that we need to make changes in our political leadership in order to gain friends overseas! Sheesh! Doing the right thing is NEVER a popularity contest - you can't ever take a poll to determine what's the right thing to do - NOT if you have scruples and principles. And you certainly don't take polls overseas or at the UN. Not unless you're a stinking failure trying to remake your legacy. Like Carter - and Clinton. (MORE HERE AT MEMEORANDUM.)

9/30/06 ADDENDUM: All the photos are of private-citizen Carter and socialist tyrants he's gone out of his way to assist, (Arafat, Kim, Chavez and Fidel). He has never gone out of his way to assist the victims of tyranny. 9/30/06 UPDATE #2: VDH agrees about Carter.

THE INNOVATIVE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN WEST VS THE REACTIONARY ISLAMIC EAST

For anyone who has trouble picking sides in the ongoing Middle East Conflict, let's step back from the conflict itself and look at some facts about the two sides. What do the two sides do with their relative resources? (From the Zionist Youngster):

Whatever wealth they have is the result of their good fortune (of having oil under their ground) and not of their efforts. Israel, poor in such natural resources, prospers by the brains and the sweat of its people ... This setting up of industry, science and culture by the Zionists predates the independence of Israel by decades, whereas the invented nation calling themselves “Palestinians” have been engaged in nothing but internecine warfare (of the violent kind), the setting up of terrorist training camps, and the maintenance of a poisonous education system ever since gaining land of their own in 1993.

Such is the difference between Israel and its enemies ...
Yes, but let's look a bit more at the difference. In 2002, the United Nations Development Program released its report on development in the 22 states of the Arab World. Get a load of these statistics:

Is the answer, then, that Jews are smart, and Arabs are stupid? No, the answer lies in Islamic ideology vs. Jewish ideology. Arabs are predominantly Muslim. Islam teaches that the Koran is the final word of Allah, and that all circumstances are Insh'allah (as Allah wills it). And, what's more Allah is beyond his creation and totally incomprehensible.

Judaism, and Christianity by extension, teaches that humans particpate in God's creation in every way, from helping to write the Word of God (The Bible) to maintaining the garden, to naming the animals. And, God is not incomprehensible to man. Instead, man was created in God's Image. Therefore, just as God is rational and creative, we are to be rational and creative.

In the world of Islam, it is blasphemy to think this way. And, that is why Muslims invent almost nothing, and produce little wealth with all the revenue from their oil. Well, they did invent the Buzzing Prayer Rug. So, let's give Allah credit where credit is due.

So, even if you have trouble disentangling the politics of the Middle East Conflict, which side would you rather have win? Which side would you rather see increase its influence in this world?

Also see: Observations on Arabs. Isaac Schrodinger also has some important links on this subject.


BUSH FAILS THE CONAN THE BARBARIAN TEST
Drudge is headlining that "The Gloves Are Off" for George W. Bush as he campaigns for Republicans going into the fall elections, just some 40 days away. I'd really like to believe it this time, but these past nearly 6 years have made me pessimistic at best.

I think when all is said and done for George W. and we look back on his legacy (you know, that thing Bill Clinton thinks of 24/7) there will be two major mistakes that stand out. The first, of which much has been written, is his refusal to clear the executive branch of former Clintonites, George Tenet being the poster boy for this failure. The second mistake, his failure to engage his political enemies and instead cling to "a new tone" in Washington. George W. Bush learned quickly that reasoning with our enemy in the War on Terror is a dead end, so why does he refuse to learn this with his enemy at home? Granted, Bush is a very secure person who doesn't care what people think of him. Overall, that's a good thing and part of his strength, but he takes it one bridge too far. The more he's worked with the Democrats (remember the Ted Kennedy Education Bill?) the more they've turned on him. Hell, even the RINO's he's gone to the mat for, Chafee, Specter, can't wait for a chance to stab him in the back.

I don't pretend to know what's in the minds of the majority of voters, but if they're like me, they vote for someone who will fight for what he believes in and will answer the challenges from his enemies. This is what many of us have been waiting for and are still waiting for on the global stage.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

WHO IS REALLY KILLING MOST ARABS AND MUSLIMS?
SOLOMONIA (from a lengthy article by Ben Dror Yemini):
...The total count reaches about 60,000 Arabs killed in the framework of the Israeli-Arab conflict. Among them only several thousand Palestinians, although it is because of them, and only them, that Israel is the target of the world’s anger. Every Arab and Muslim death is regrettable. And it is okay to criticize Israel. But the obsessive and demonic criticism emphasizes a far more amazing fact: The silence of the world, or at least relative silence, in the face of the systematic extermination of millions of others by Muslim and Arab regimes.
60,000 SINCE 1949. That's in SEVERAL WARS: in 1949, 1956, 1967, 1972, two intifada's, the Lebanon war and the Hizballah war. That's over 57 years. DURING THE SAME PERIOD OF TIME:
more Arabs were killed by other Arabs - in Algeria alone at least 500,000 have been killed; more Arabs were killed by Persians - in the Iran-Iraw War; more Muslims were killed by Hindus in India; and more Shias were killed by Sunnis in Iraq alone.
Therefore, the whole entire FOCUS of the world on the Israeli-Arab conflict is entirely bogus, a reflection of anti-Semitism and not REALITY. And it also reflects the fact that many MANY people - of all partisan persuasions - have bought into Arab propaganda which demonizes and blames Israel - the "Israel Lobby", the Jewish neocons, the Likudniks - for our current GWOT. But the truth is that Casey Sheehan did not die for Israel, and the three IDF soldiers who are being held hostage are not victims of anti-Zionism. Casey died for humanity's thousand year struggle to attain universal human rights, peace and prosperity for everyone. And the IDF soldiers are hostages because they were on the front-lines of that war.

Those who blame Israel for Arab genocide or for igniting the GWOT are doing the bidding of the enemy.

9/29/06 UPDATE:
VDH AGREES: "... radical Islam's hatred of Jews is becoming normalized." RTWT.

ACCORDING TO THE NYTIMES: THE NYTIMES "SWIFT" LEAK MADE US ALL LESS SAFE
NYTIMES:
[Swift’s chief executive, Leonard Schrank, said,] “We are caught between complying with the U.S. and European rules, and it’s a train wreck. But what we have done saves lives in the U.S. and Europe, and we must not lose sight of that.”

The fact that Swift did not notify European authorities about the data transfers until after their existence was revealed in an article in The New York Times prompted criticism of Swift by the Belgian commission.

Mr. Schrank said that Swift had satisfied the relevant disclosure rules, but had decided “not to notify broadly” for fear of tipping off terrorists to security tactics.
TOO BAD FOR US: The NYTIMES tipped off the terrorists. AT LEAST ACCORDING TO THE NYTIMES, NO LESS! SHEESH!

Seriously, since the folks who write and publish the NYTIMES are not dummies, we must deduct that they wanted to tip off the enemy. Which makes them TRAITORS. If Bush had balls, then he'd have USAG Gonzales and FBID Mueller frog-march Keller and Sulzberger out of the TIMES' offices and into federal prison.

*******9/29/06 UPDATE: EMERITUS PROFESSOR OF LAW AGREES (via NEWBUSTERS):
... those of us who ... understand the nature and importance of today’s War on Terror, should not rest until the government calls to account The New York Times—in a court of law, with an indictment and hopefully a conviction, under the Espionage Act.
This would be a HUGE blow against our jihadoterrorist enemy. We'd get fewer leaks - and less fauxtography/propaganda, too.

KAFIR: "If you want to understand virtually any Muslim attitude or behavior, you should read the Koran."
CLARITY & RESOLVE:
If you want to understand virtually any Muslim attitude or behavior, you should read the Koran....
Binladen ain't making any of his sh*t up; in fact, it's why Irshad Manji calls him and his ilk LITERALISTS. Meaning, what they say and do is literally in the Koran. It's what their scripture ORDERS THEM TO DO. It's what their culture is based on. Their family life; their goals and wishes. And it's why nearly al the terror and war in the wo9uld involves Islamists.

Just as we had to de-nazify Germany, we will have to de-islamicize that part of the world if we are ever going to have peace and bring universal human rights to all of humanity.

THE MSM SUPPORTS THE ENEMY BY STOKING THE ARAB STREET, AND ALSO BY HIDING THE TRUTH FROM THE TRULY FEARSOME "AMERICAN STREET"
All the fauxtography the MSM recently ran on the Hizballah War attacked the IDF and stoked the Arab Street.

This is the same MSM which incessantly ran the Abu Ghraib photos -- (despite the many Pentagon and White House pleas NOT TO, because it would needlessly "stoke the Arab Street") -- BUT REFUSED to show photos of people jumping out of the WTC Tower, (an act Karzai rightfully felt COMPELLED to REMIND to the NYTIMES reporter who asked him and Bush a question which reeked of BDS).

Even the way the MSM reported the Pope's speech in Regensberg was blatantly distorted and reported out of context in order to make the Arab Street angry, and the Pope look bad.

These are just three simple recent examples. There literally THOUSANDS of other insatnces of blatant anti-American reporting by the MSM the last 5 years.

The consistenly Anti-American, anti-West/pro Arab Street bias can only be explained by one thing: the MSM is dominated by post mopdernists who hate the West and want the USA brought down a notch. All the BS about multi-lateralism and a "more even-handed" approach to so-called "Palistinian" issues is window-dressing.

If the MSM reported the facts accurately (AND THEY KNOW THIS!), then the AMERICAN Street would RISE UP, and the enemy would be more easily and quickly vanquished and the West saved. And the billion Muslims suffering under various forms of tyranny, poverty, and ignorance would all begin to become freer, and more proserous. Er um... more WESTERN.

The MSM is the enemy's MOST EFFEFTIVE weapon: the only way the enemy can win is if we give up. And the only way we will ever give up is if Americans can be brainwashed into feeling we have already lost. This is how the Left - and the the MSM they dominate - got the USA to abandon South Vietnam. They want to do it again - TO IRAQ THIS TIME. And they're using the same methods: the BIG LIE, sensationalist stories which misrepresent the truth -- (if you read "news" about Tete at the ntimje then you'd belive we lost! But the fact is... WE WON! When Cronkite reported on it he treated it as a lost, and LBJ said, fampusly, that if he'd lost Cronkite, then he'd lost the country. The MSM has never forgotten this).

MORE HERE - (links to a brilliant piece by Lifson of The American Thinker).


9/29/06 UPDATE: VDH AGREES: "... radical Islam's hatred of Jews is becoming normalized." By the MSM and the academy.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

JUST A REMINDER: BDS IS REAL, AND THOSE AFFLICTED ARE REALLY INSANE
Remember the Bush/Kerry debates? The BDS afflicted Left accused Bush of wearing a device to help him answer questions. It was reported by SALON and MOTHER JONES. Of course, this charge was insane.

TODAY... popular Left-wing blogger MARC COOPER (and PJM associate) actually wrote this:
“Whatever else this is, it is not a constitutional democracy. It is a thinly-veiled military dictatorship, subject to only one control: the will of the Great Decider. And the war that justifies this astonishing attack on American liberty is permanent, without end.”
This charge is simply insane, too. This is the same crowd that claims 9/11 was an inside job. WHICH IS BEYOND INSANE!

The Left is dominated by insane, BDS afflicted wackos. And the Left dominates the Democrat Party. Which is why we mustn't let them win EITHER House of Congress.

ISLAM: "LIKE A 3 YR OLD ... WITH ANGER MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS"
LILEKS (via VIKINGPUNDIT):
Islam has to be treated with unusual deference, like a 3-year-old child with anger management problems.
The over-indulged "young bullie" comparison is very apt on a political level, too: libs are sterotypically soft on discipling their own kids, and (as Sowell pointed out today - via RCP) they've always been weak on punishing criminals and gangs. Just as they've always blamed gang crime on "social conditions" instead of on the criminals, they blame the USA and/or Bush for jihadoterror - despite the fact that jihadoterror is 1400 years old! Sowell:
... the same people who have for years been more protective of criminals than of their victims who are now more protective of captured terrorists than of those who are their targets. When such attitudes became ascendant in our courts during the 1960s, the declining trend in crime rates suddenly reversed and skyrocketed, as liberal judges created new "rights" for criminals out of thin air and called it constitutional law.

But this goes far beyond judges and far beyond our own times. The political left has been weak on protecting society from criminals for more than two centuries.
So, the Left's efforts to appease jihadoterror as if it were a criminal problem - or a form of juvenile delinquincy which "WE" are someow responsible for - is very deep-rooted. And this is why we mustn't allow the Democrat Party - which is now firmly under control of its Left-wing - win control of either House of Congress.

SAUDIS TO BUILD FENCE ALONG ENTIRE IRAQI BORDER
AP (via Drudge):
Saudi Arabia is pushing ahead with plans to build a fence to block terrorists from crossing its 560-mile border with Iraq _ another sign of growing alarm that Sunni-Shiite strife could spill over and drag Iraq's neighbors into its civil conflict.

The barrier, which hasn't been started, is part of a $12 billion package of measures including electronic sensors, security bases and physical barriers to protect the oil-rich kingdom from external threats, said Nawaf Obaid, head of the Saudi National Security Assessment Project, an independent research institute that advises the Saudi government.
THE SAUDIS ARE BUILDING AN ANTI-TERROR FENCE, AND NEITHER THE UN, NOR THE EU, NOR HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, OR ISM OR AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PROTESTED.

BUT WHEN ISRAEL BUILT A FENCE - FOR THE SAME REASON, THEY ALL PROTESTED AND EVEN TOOK ISRAEL TO THE WORLD COURT.

WHY THE DOUBLE STANDARD? SIMPLE: ANTI-SEMITISM. AND THIS IS THE VERY SAME REASON WHY ISRAEL WASN'T ALLOWED TO DESTROY HIZBALLAH, TOO. JEWS ARE HELD TO A DIFFERENT SET OF RULES THAN EVERYONE ELSE. IT'S UNFAIR. AND WRONG. THE ENTIRE WEST IS FACING THE SAME ENEMY, AND WE SHOULD ALL PULL TOGETHER.

9/28/06 UPDATE: GATEWAY PUNDIT AGREES.

TOKYO ROSE DIES, BUT HER TRAITOROUS LEGACY LIVES ON IN THE MSM
NYTIMES:
Iva Toguri D’Aquino, the Japanese-American convicted of treason in 1949 for broadcasting propaganda from Japan to United States servicemen in World War II as the seductive but sinister Tokyo Rose, died Tuesday in Chicago.

... Up to the end of World War II, there had only been some 30 treason cases in United States history. When Mrs. D’Aquino [Tokyo Rose] went on trial, five Americans had been convicted of treason for actions in the war, four having broadcast for Nazi Germany, most notably Millard Gillars, known as Axis Sally.


Tom DeWolfe, a special assistant attorney general, told the jury that Mrs. D’Aquino had engaged in “nefarious propagandistic broadcasts” without being under duress.
Er um, it seems to me that most of the MSM is guilty of willingly broadcasting nefarious propaganda for the enemy nowadays! And THIS - MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE - demoralizes our side and helps the enemy recruit.

I truly feel that many in the MSM should be prosecuted for aiding the enemy - especially the leakers, like the NYTIMES. When the MSM repeatedly shows the Abu Ghraib photos and repeats false stories - like al Duras and Jeningrad and the toiletted Koran - they only serve our enemies.

EGYPT SENDS A HARSHLY WORDED LETTER TO HAMAS DEMANDING RELEASE OF IDF SOLDIER
This is a nice PR gesture, but harshly worded letters to jihadoterrorists are about as effective as cursing the wind. JPOST:
Egypt has demanded that Hamas immediately release kidnapped IDF soldier Cpl. Gilad Shalit to avoid a worsening crisis in the Gaza Strip, Palestinian officials and Arab diplomats said.

The Egyptian demand came in a "strongly worded letter" from Egypt's powerful intelligence chief Omar Suleiman to the Syrian-based Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal, the officials said Tuesday.
It is time the ENTIRE West - and all those who aspire to the freedoms and prosperity of the West - stopped defending itself with harshly worded letters. The West must confront the enemy with real harsh consequences. The only message we need to deliver to Mashal should be delivered by a Hellfire missile via a Predator Drone!

USA HEGEMONY ISN'T JUST A MYTH; IT'S TOTAL BS!
A while back I posted a short essay which entirely disproved the idiotic Leftist notion of "USA CULTURAL Hegemony"; (CLICK HERE).

I will now demolish the Leftist idea of "USA Political Hegemony" - just by comparing the nations said to be under USA hegemony the last 50 years to the nations under Soviet of Jihadist hegemony.

All the nations under so-called USA hegemony expanded their human rights and their prosperity under USA influence and protection - while those under Soviet or Jihadist hegemony had less and less liberty, and became poorer and poorer - (until the whole shebang collapsed!):
Western Europe was better for people than Eastern Europe; South Korea was better for people than North Korea; Japan and the Philipines and Taiwan and Singapore - and South Vietnam and Thailand - were better for people than China and Cambodia and Laos. REPEAT: Hong Kong was better than China. Puerto Rico and the DR are better off than Cuba. Even India sucked until - like China - they abandoned Marxism and opened up to economic ties with the "evil greedy capitalistic USA!"

The last 2 decades of trade with the "evil greedy capitalistic " USA has lifted more Chinese out of poverty than the previous 5 decades of Marxist/Maoist idealism. We have exploited them right into the 21st century!
There is not a single solitary country which was under real USSR hegemony which did better than those under so-called "USA hegemony. " The walls were built to keep them in, not us out! The BOAT PEOPLE were fleeing Vietnam and Cuba, not San Diego or Boston!

And we didn't even EVER conscript their citizens, or tax the people in these "captive client states". In fact, the opposite is quite true: WE PAID EXTRA TAXES TO PROTECT THEM - WITH OUR CONSCRIPTS, OUR SOLDIERS, OUR BLOOD! We sacrificed for their freedom. That AIN'T "dominance"; that's humanistic heroism!

Noam Chomsky, and jerks like Chavez and Moore and Sheehan and Glover and Belafonte and Harkin who admire him, are just plain flat out wrong. TOTALLY FRIGGIN' WRONG.

The best thing for any nation the last 100 years was to become our ally.

AND NEVER FORGET THAT Saddam and Arafat and Assad and Khaddafy and Kim and Fidel - and MOST of the other real tyrants in the world who directly and indirectly threatened our national security (and the security of ourallies) - were supported by the USSR, NOT THE USA.

Sure: we tacitly supported Pinochet (and a few other unsavory authoritarians like Marcos) - but they were nothing compared to the Marxist tyrants. In fact, to this day Chile is one of the best economies in all of South America and it's a result of having been SAVED from Marxist tyranny and Soviet hegemony by PINOCHET!

So when you hear a Lefty start to whine about USA foreign policy over the last 50 years - or 50 months - and say that the USA is just doing the bidding of our power elite, the richest capitalist and industrialists (and Big Oil and Israel and Saudi Arabia) just tell them to STFU!

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

CHAVEZ RANT MAY CAUSE CITGO TO LOSE LUCRATIVE FLORIDA HIGHWAY LOCATIONS
CONVENIENCE STORE NEWS:
Eight CITGO stations may have to pay the price for Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's statement last week about U.S. President George W. Bush. A south Florida legislator wants the state to cancel its contracts with the stations that reside along the Florida Turnpike, the Tallahassee Democrat Capitol reported.

Rep. Adam Hasner (R-Delray Beach) has written a letter to the state's Department of Transportation secretary, Denver Stutler, asking for the contract's cancellation.

"As you are aware, CITGO is wholly owned by Petroleos de Venezuela, the national oil company of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela," Hasner wrote last week to Stutler. "We must send a clear message to Chavez and the current government of Venezuela that the state of Florida and our citizens will not support institutions that seek the destabilization of America and our institutions and freedoms."
BRAVO! We should no sooner let Chavez have these locations than let AQ Khan run our ports.

THE LEFTIE DOVES WHO RUN THE DEMOCRAT PARTY ANNOUNCE THEY WILL ABANDON IRAQ
... JUST LIKE THEY ABANDONED SOUTH VIETNAM. AND THEY BRAG ABOUT IT!

THE HILL - (VIA INFIDEL BLOGGERS ALLIANCE):
... when pressed on how he could stop the war even if Democrats control the House during the last years of President Bush’s second term, Rangel [WHO WOULD BECOME CHAIRMAN OF THE POWERFUL HOUSE HAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE] paused before saying, “You’ve got to be able to pay for the war, don’t you?”

Rangel’s views on funding the war are shared by many of his colleagues – especially within the 73-member Out of Iraq Caucus.

Some Democratic legislators want to halt funding for the war immediately, while others say they would allocate money for activities such as reconstruction, setting up international security forces, and the ultimate withdrawal of U.S. troops.

“Personally, I wouldn’t spend another dime [on the war,]” said Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.).

Woolsey is among the Democrats in Congress who are hoping to control the power of the purse in 2007 to force an end to the war. Woolsey and some of her colleagues note that Congress helped force the end of Vietnam War by refusing to pay for it.
THESE LEFTIE DOVES GET THE FACTS AND DATES WRONG, BUT THE GIST OF WHAT THEY SAY ABOUT VIETNAM IS ACCURATE - Wikipedia:
American combat troops were involved from 1959, but not in large numbers until 1965. They left the country in 1973.... [THAT'S 1973!] the war ... ended on April 30, 1975, [THAT'S 1975!] with the capitulation of South Vietnam. ...

In December 1974, the Democrat majority in Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act of 1974, which cut off all military funding to the South Vietnamese government and made unenforceable the peace terms negotiated by Nixon.
THE CONCLUSION IS INARGUABLE:
South Vietnam would be as free and prosperous as South Korea today (instead of almost as tyannized and poor as NORTH Korea) if the doves of the Democrat party hadn't ABANDONED them in 1975, (effectively).
And they are publicly proclaiming they will do the same thing to the Iraqis. I feel they won't stop there: They will abandon the Afghanis. And then Israelis; (FACT: a majority of Dems polled by the LAT felt that our current foreign policy is biased in favor of Israel!).

MORE HERE - in a must read/RTWT - CFR ARTICLE BY MELVIN LAIRD; excerpt:
Summary: "During Richard Nixon's first term, when I served as secretary of defense, we withdrew most U.S. forces from Vietnam while building up the South's ability to defend itself. The result was a success -- until Congress snatched defeat from the jaws of victory by cutting off funding for our ally in 1975. Washington should follow a similar strategy now, but this time finish the job properly."
THE LEFTIE DOVE DEMOCRATS ARE PROMISING THEY WILL NOT FINISH THE JOB PROPERLY!

THAT'S WHY WE MUST NOT ALLOW THEM TO GET A MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE.

VIDEO PROVES AL DURAS LIVES AND FRANCE2 LIES
WATCH IT YOURSELF. WITNESS THE FILTHY ANTI-SEMITIC LIES OF THE PALISTANIS AND THEIR COMRADES IN THE MSM.

Monday, September 25, 2006

HAS AL SADR FINALLY BEEN TAMED?
Yesterday - in a post nobody seemed to notice - I related the fact that US forces had arrested a few of al Sadr's top aides, and I expressed my hope that this was the beginning of the LONG overdue get tough program.

GATEWAY PUNDIT reports news from Iraq which might indicate this new "get tough" program is already paying off; from AZZAMAN - in Iraq:
The Shiite radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr seems to be willing to compromise and is urging his followers not to use force in opposing the Iraqi government and the presence of U.S. troops. ... Sadr said his call for comprise and civil resistance was for the sake of sparing Iraqi blood.
This might be another important turning point for the Iraqi government and for Iraqi civil life. If they can get al Sadr's Brigades to chill out, then maybe they can get the sectarian violence to end and civi order restored. Remember, this deal with al Sadr comes on the heels last month's deal in which 85% of the Sunni tribal leaders annouced they would stop aiding the insurgency. And we are still killing al Qaeda bighshots in Iraq, too. SO.... I'd say current indications are that things in Iraq are finally going very VERY WELL. (Once we smash the jihadoterror-sponsoring states on Iraq's borders - Iran and Syria - things will be going GRRRRRRREAT!)

Sunday, September 24, 2006

BLAMING THE IRAQ WAR FOR INCREASING JIHADOTERROR IS LIKE BLAMING THE POPE'S SPEECH FOR THE RIOTS WHICH FOLLOWED IT
YUP: BLAMING THE IRAQ WAR FOR INCREASING JIHADOTERROR IS LIKE BLAMING THE POPE'S SPEECH FOR THE RIOTS WHICH FOLLOWED IT. This iditoic approach absolves the enemy of their part, their choices, their guilt. As I have written before: We can NEVER be held responsible for what the jihadoterrorists do.

The fact is, that it was al Qaeda that decided to make Iraq a central front in their Global Jihad, not the USA or the Iraqis. Remember: the Bali bombing was BEFORE the Iraq War even started. As were many MANY other international jihadoterrorist attacks.
Like.... er um: 9/11.

But we should NOT be surpirsed that this attack on Bush is being made by the CIA: they've been attacking him since the start of the war; the Plame-Wilson Affair was just one of their efforts - an attempt at a virtual coup d'etat against Bush.

The anti-war crowd always blames America first. Unless they can blame the Pope or Israel.

This crowd is made up of a bunch of post-modern elitists who are fundamentally anti-West. Folks like Kerry's father - a life-long State Department official who wrote a book in which he argued a diminshed USA would be good for the world. QUOTE:
The Star-Spangled Mirror [Richard Kerry's book] is a critique of moralism in America's foreign policy -- and, more than that, it is a critique of America's national character.

"Americans," he writes, "are inclined to see the world and foreign affairs in black and white." They celebrate their own form of government and denigrate all others, making them guilty of what he calls "ethnocentric accommodation -- everyone ought to be like us." As a result, America has committed the "fatal error" of "propagating democracy" and fallen prey to "the siren's song of promoting human rights," falsely assuming that our values and institutions are a good fit in the Third World. And, just as Americans exaggerate their own goodness, they exaggerate their enemies' badness.

The Soviet Union wasn't nearly as imperialistic as American politicians warned, [Richard] Kerry argues. "Seeing the Soviet Union as the aggressor in every instance, and the U.S. as only reacting defensively, relieves an American observer from the need to see any parallel between our use of military power in distant parts of the world, and the Soviet use of military power outside the Soviet Union," he writes.
Just as Kerry's father, Richard, APOLOGIZED for the USSR and ATTACKED the USA, so too now do they APOLOGIZE for JIHADOTERRORISTS and attack Bush.

WHY IS THIS SO?! The CIA and the State Department are still dominated by post-modern Leftists and anti-Semitic
status quoists like Kerry's father.

This report is merely another attempt by these status quoists to topple Bush, and demolish his policies. IT WON'T WORK. WHY?!
Patriotic Americans don't retreat. We have only just begun to fight.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!
I wish everyone a happy and healthy NEW YEAR!

LEAKED INTEL' REPORT ALLEGEDLY STATES THE OBVIOUS: OUR COUNTER-ATTACK - (IN IRAQ) - HAS EXACERBATED THE ENEMY.
The inept analysis divisions of the USA intel' community have apparently concluded - according to a politically inspired and timed leak, (intended to hurt Bush and the GOP before the election -- an all too common tactic of late!) - that the Iraq War has exacerbated the enemy. (MEMEORANDUM has a complete roundup.)

SO WHAT?! I mean.... counter-attacking ALWAYS makes the enemy fight-back more! And appeasement, retreat and surrender will always quiet things down - TEMPORARILY. COUNTER-ATTACKS always make the enemy fight-back harder, too - UNTIL THEY SURRENDER - this is just a fact of war; IT ALWAYS HAS BEEN, TOO!
EXAMPLE: In WW2, the Japanese use of kamikazis did not even begin until March 1945! The Japanese became more angry and desperate the closer we got to defeating them, to pulverizing them into unconditonal surrender. The enemy will save their worst most horrible heinous weapons for when they need them most - as they sense that they're getting closer to their defeat.
Until we utterly smash the jihadist enemy EVERYWHERE, they will retaliate - as much as they can, and they will escalate - as much as they can, and they will recruit - AS MUCH AS THEY CAN, becoming more desperate the more we WHACK'EM! This would be true whether we counter-attack them in Iraq or anywhere else.

SO: Can someone PLEASE tell the CIA we're at war with a seriously dangerous enemy!? (And while you're at it: tell the Left and the MSM they dominate.) And there is NO DOUBT that the defeatist anti-American reportage from the MSM has only ENCOURAGED the enemy and their DEFEATIST comrades in the Left! The MSM carrying water for the enemy - operating like a Fifth Column - has a much more negative effect on our resolve and a much more positive effect on the enemy's reslove then our successes on the battlefield.

The FACT is that the enemy has NOT WON A SINGLE, SOLITARY BATTLE IN THE ENTIRE WAR. But the way the MSM is reporting the war, many think we are losing and stuck in a quagmire. This is the result of a deliberate anti-American (so-called "anti-war") effort, and it is truly the most disgusting and dangerous front in the GWOT right now.

And these "anti-war" efforts of the MSM are absolutely going to get worse the closer we get to the election. SO: Brace yourself for more slander and defeatism. Which is why I am always saying: To defeat the jihadist enemy abroad we have to defeat the Left at home.

Friday, September 22, 2006

ARE WE FINALLY CORNERING AL SADR? IS MALIKI FINALLY GETTING TOUGH?
AP:
Two top aides to radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr were detained early Thursday by U.S. forces in the southern city of Najaf, a spokesman for al-Sadr said.

Salah al-Obeidi, a spokesman for al-Sadr who delivers Friday prayers on behalf of the cleric in the nearby city of Kufa, and Muayed al-Khazraji, a leading aide from Baghdad, were taken in a raid by U.S. and Iraqi forces at about 1 a.m. local time, said Muhammed Jamil, a spokesman in the city some 160 kilometers (100 miles) south of Baghdad.
I hope we and the Iraqi government keep the heat on this Iranian-supported jihadoterrorist bastard. He and his comrades are a major cause of violence in Baghdad.

PROOF THAT MSM-JIHADOTERRORIST COLLUSION GOES BEYOND PROPAGANDIZING
MATZAV:
... foreign reporters' armored vehicles may (may?) be used to ferry terrorists to carry out terror attacks in Israel. ... [YNET]:
Armored vehicles that were given to foreign news agencies operating in the country with the authorization of the State of Israel, may be used by hostile groups to carry out terror attacks against Israel, Director of the Government Press Office Danny Seaman warned in a letter addressed to Shin Bet Head Yuval Diskin.

On August 27 an Israel Defense Forces helicopter hit an armored vehicle that belonged to the Reuters news agency in Gaza. According to Seaman, the incident illustrated the failures in overseeing the use of armored vehicles granted to the foreign media agencies with the permission of the State.

The vehicle's presence in Gaza in itself constituted a violation of its license terms, and moreover, the jeep was carrying only Palestinians – one with links to Hamas who was not a Reuters employee.
Carrying terrorists in these vehicles goes beyond carrying water for the enemy - literally and figuratively. It is direct and palpable collusion in the enemy's Geneva Convention breaking and OSLO busting terror war. It's disgusting. These MSM scum have no scruples, and of course no shame. Their deceit knows no bounds. They are part of the enemy's operations to commit genocidal terror against Jews.

NEW PSYCHOLOGICAL SYNDROME DISCOVERED: "H.I.S.S."
We all know all about BDS. Now there's a new syndrome; it's called H.I.S.S. - "Head In Sand Syndrome." They often go together. Heh. (HISS is also the sound people with BDS make as they slither among our foes. Heh, heh.) And when they rant and rave about BusHitlerburton being the most dangerous man in the world, they're throwing a "HISSY FIT". Heh, heh, heh.

ABBAS AT UN: "UNITY GOVERNMENT WILL RECOGNIZE ISRAEL." HAMAS: "BS! ONLY 10 YEAR HUDNA."
In a bid to get international welfare-checks to the non-"self-sustainable" Palistanis restored, Abbas made a promise on his speech to the UNGA which he cannot keep; BBC:
Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas has said any unity government negotiated with militant group Hamas would recognise Israel and renounce violence. ... Mr Abbas is seeking a government which includes his Fatah movement and Hamas, which won elections in January. ....

A Hamas official responded that there would be no explicit recognition but said it was prepared to agree to a 10-year truce with the Jewish state.
Temporary recognition for the purposes of a temporary truce is not acceptance. And without acceptance there can be no peace, and withiout peace there can be no two-state settlement.

It seems obvious to me tht there will be no peace and no recognition of Israel until the enemies of Israel who deny Israel's right to exist are utterly vanquished and surrender unconditionally. As we did the Nazis and the Japanese.

This means Israel and its allies must fight and defeat Hizballah and Hamas and the other assorted jihadoterrorist groups, and it also means neutralizing the pro-jihadist terror-supporting trgimes in Syria and Iran. And the sooner the better.

MANY IN BLOGOSPHERE NOW URGE BOYCOTT OF CITGO... which I proposed 5 months ago
As of right now about 500 bloggers - including the GREAT Malkin and Babalu - are urging Americans to BOYCOTT CITGO, (because it is a Venezuela state-owned and run corporation, meaning it pays for Chavez and his anti-American, anti-Semitic pro-Jihadist pro-Fidel Marxist antics).

I first suggested this in the Spring. I'm glad the rest of the blogosphere is finally catching up. (Why did I post on it back then? That's when the Chavez Propaganda Machine was embraced by the Kennedy Clan and a few Democrat Congressmen. Read all about it - it's got plenty of good links.)

NEW HORRIFYING TACTIC MEANS THAT THE JIHADISTS ARE RUNNING OUT OF VOLUNTEERS IN IRAQ
NYTIMES/AP:
Insurgents are now using unwitting kidnap victims as suicide bombers -- seizing them, booby-trapping their cars without their knowledge, then releasing them only to blow up the vehicles by remote control, the Defense Ministry warned Thursday. ... first "a motorist is kidnapped with his car. They then booby-trap the car without the driver knowing. Then the kidnapped driver is released and threatened to take a certain road."

The kidnappers then follow the car and when the unwitting victim ''reaches a checkpoint, a public place, or an army or police patrol, the criminal terrorists following the driver detonate the car from a distance." ...

It was unclear from the Defense Ministry's statement whether the insurgents are using kidnap victims because they are having trouble finding recruits for suicide missions. ...

Although roadside bombs are the main weapon used by insurgents, suicide car bombers are often their most effective one -- designed to maximize casualties and sow fear among the population.
If they had volunteers, then they could just steal the cars. This is another sign that the enemy is in it's last throes - if we can keep them from being reinforced by Iran and Syria.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

CHAVEZ AND THAT SULFUR SMELL
CHAVEZ SAID THAT THE UN SMELT LIKE SULFUR. ... HE SHOULD CHECK HIS UPPER LIP; IT PROBABLY SMELLS JUST LIKE AHMADINEJAD'S BUTTOCKS.

BIRDS OF A FEATHER - PART 22: THE ACADEMY AND THE TYRANNICAL, MARXIST LEFT - or - "CHAVEZ AT COOPER UNION"
AP:
[After his UN diatribe, Chavez] spoke to hundreds of New Yorkers who filled a college hall Wednesday night...

He drew a standing ovation when he said Bush committed genocide during the war in Iraq. "The president of the United States should go before an international tribunal," Chavez said as applause filled the hall at The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.

He compared the Bush administration's actions to those of the Nazis. ...

The Venezuelan has become Latin America's leading voice against the U.S. government, and his speeches were reminiscent of crusading addresses by his mentor Fidel Castro of Cuba and the late Argentine revolutionary Ernesto "Che" Guevara. ...


He also referred to his past threats that he could cut off oil exports to the U.S. if it tries to oust him.

"Believe me, if I were to decide tomorrow to stop sending oil to the United States ... the price would go up to $150, $200 a barrel. But we don't want to do it, and we aren't going to do it," Chavez said. "We ask only for respect."

... Singer and activist Harry Belafonte introduced Chavez at the event, while former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark also attended, among supporters who waved Venezuelan flags and chanted Chavez's name.

The Venezuelan leader signed autographs as a crowd rushed to him after the speech.
This demonstrates once again that much of the Academy - the folks who're teaching our next generation - are anti-American Leftists. They show love to this Marxist tyrant even as he BRAGS that he can single-handedly decide to cut-off oil supplies to the USA anytime he chooses (which, I shouldn't have to point out, is decidely tyrannical and totally anti-free market).

The tyrant's stage-comrades were apt: Chavez was flanked by flagrant anti-Americans Harry Belafonte and Ramsey Clark - two aged darlings of the extreme Left who've never met an anti-American tyrant they didn't love.

The setting was sadly ironic: Cooper Union is where Lincoln gave the anti-slavery speech that propelled him to the White House. Lincoln must be spinning in his grave that this hallowed ground has once again been used by Marxists - who believe in a failed doctrine which is fundamentally opposed to liberty - to denigrate the USA and aid and abet our enemies.

BETSY has a post which reveals the truth about this Marxist tyrant
.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

ABC NEWS: THE TACTICS MCCAIN WOULD OUTLAW HAVE BROKEN TERRORISTS AND PREVENTED ATTACKS
HOT AIR has posted VIDEO of Brian Ross of ABC News relating to O'Reilly of FOX the fact that the CIA's use of harsh tactics - like water-boarding (which McCain and Graham and their Leftie comrades would ban) - broke all 14 of the top al Qaeda terrorists in secret prisons, including Khaled Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi Binalshibh; the information they gave was invaluable and saved lives. Maybe tens of thousands. Not to mention perhaps trillions of dollars of damages and a surge in unemployment, (if the attacks they stopped were anything like 9/11).

MORE LINKS HERE AT MEMEORANDUM.

I believe that McCain is a hand-wringer who is trying hard to attain a "holier than thou" position - with regard to the jihadists and his own political opponents. This is insane and dangerous. Dr. Sanity properly diagnosed attitude:
Let me be perfectly clear. We are morally superior to the animals we fight. They are the ones who have no respect for human life, human dignity, or human freedom; and they demonstrate this in their behavior on a daily basis.

Maudlin handwringing and suicidal agonizing as a response to their reckless hate and unyielding determination to kill or enslave us would not seem to be a very effective strategy. In fact, it is a sign of complete moral irresponsibility and a betrayal of all that we value.
If McCain and his comrades succeed in making it tougher for us to get the intel' we need, then they will be responsible for the next attack.

FORMER ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY DEFENDS POPE AND SLAMS ISLAM
LONDON TIMES - VIA MEMEORANDUM:
THE former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey of Clifton has issued his own challenge to “violent” Islam in a lecture in which he defends the Pope’s “extraordinarily effective and lucid” speech.

Lord Carey said that Muslims must address “with great urgency” their religion’s association with violence. He made it clear that he believed the “clash of civilisations” endangering the world was not between Islamist extremists and the West, but with Islam as a whole.

“We are living in dangerous and potentially cataclysmic times,” he said. “There will be no significant material and economic progress [in Muslim communities] until the Muslim mind is allowed to challenge the status quo of Muslim conventions and even their most cherished shibboleths.”

... Lord Carey, who as Archbishop of Canterbury became a pioneer in Christian-Muslim dialogue, himself quoted a contemporary political scientist, Samuel Huntington, who has said the world is witnessing a “clash of civilisations”.

Arguing that Huntington’s thesis has some “validity”, Lord Carey quoted him as saying: “Islam’s borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power.”

Lord Carey went on to argue that a “deep-seated Westophobia” has developed in recent years in the Muslim world.
BRAVO! RTWT.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

IN UN SPEECH, MUSHARRAF CALLS FOR A BAN ON DEFAMATION OF ISLAM. BUT WHO REALLY DEFAMES ISLAM?
VIA PASTORIUS AT INFIDEL BLOGGERS:
PAKISTANI President Pervez Musharraf today called for a ban on the "defamation of Islam" in a speech to the UN General Assembly in which he took a veiled swipe at Pope Benedict XVI for his remarks linking the Muslim faith to violence.

"We also need to bridge, through dialogue and understanding, the growing divide between the Islamic and Western worlds," General Musharraf told the 192-member assembly.
Okay, fine.. I agree. BUT, WHO IS REALLY DEFAMING ISLAM: THOSE WHO COMMIT ATROCITIES IN THE NAME OF ISLAM, OR "NON-BELIEVERS" WHO REACT NEGATIVELY TO ISLAMIC TERROR?

If the islamoterrorists are not perverting Islam, then the "non-believers" cannot be defaming it.

I TELL YOU WHAT, PERVEZ: When a leading "non-believer" (like Benedict) can criticize Islam and NOT be met with violence or the threat of violence, then-and-only-then might I believe that Islam deserves ANY respect at all. Until then I shall consider it a vile, evil martial creed which inculcates violence and ignorance and genocide and misogyny.

IOW: Islam's best defense against defamation is Muslim's behaving well, tolerating criticism or responding to it with reason - and not with violence, and combatting terrorism committed in their religion's name!

Without that, what Pervez calls defamation is just the truth, baby. And sometimes: the truth hurts.

As Truman said: "I'm not giving them hell; I just tell the truth, and they think it's hell!"

GRAPHIC PHOTOS OF CIA TORTURE METHODS
HERE. Heh.
UPDATE: SHOCKING VIDEO! HEH!

THAI COUP HAIKU
AN ARMY LED COUP
IN THAILAND TAKES CONTROL AND
THE CURRENCY DROPS.


Seriously... the frightening thing is that the coup is led by a Muslim general who wants to appease/negotiate with the Muslim rebels in the south who have murdered 1700 Thai's in the last two years. (This fact was not mentioned by the NYTIMES or the BBC. I wonder why?!)

The severe currency drop could cause a severe financial crisis in Thailand, but right now many experts doubt it could spread to the region - at least according to those interviewed by Bloomberg (link above)..

Tomorrow, the junta will announce their new policy. STAY TUNED...

EVEN MORE PROOF THAT SOCIALIZED HEALTHCARE SUCKS
SAY ANYTHING: ...a socialized medicine bureaucrat over in the UK opts to [PAY FOR!] a hip replacement through a private health care provider [insead of waiting nearly a year for a free one]...

GMA/ABC USED FAUX-REPUBLICANS TO GENERATE FAUX-NEWS
Fakes news - otherwise known as propaganda - doesn't just come from the Middle East: NEWSBUSTERS found this - right here on the MSM:
Friday's Good Morning America featured a segment with Robin Roberts in Memphis with three Southern women, identified as Republicans, who are all supposedly "having second thoughts about their party" and now plan to vote for Democrats. But a quick Internet search found that two of the three have backgrounds which raise questions about their fidelity to the GOP.
IOW: they are Democrats! RTWT for details.

MY QUESTION IS: Just how did ABC/GMA "find" these fake Republicans!? Did the fakers hoodwink ABC? Or was the GMA segment producer in on it? If so HE SHOULD BE REPRIMANDED AND DEMOTED.

I think using fake guests is a HUGE scandal, something that wouldn't be - and hasn't been - condoned on the Jerry Springer Show. HAS ABC NEWS AND GMA SUNK LOWER THAN SPRINGER?! Are they that partisan. I guess so.

BUSH ON IRAN AT UN
THE POTUS:
To the people of Iran: The United States respects you; we your country. We admire your rich history, your vibrant culture, and your many contributions to civilization.

You deserve an opportunity to determine your own future, an economy that rewards your intelligence and your talents, and a society that allows you to fulfill your tremendous potential.

The greatest obstacle to this future is that your rulers have chosen to deny you liberty and to use your nation's resources to fund terrorism, and fuel extremism, and pursue nuclear weapons.

The United Nations has passed a clear resolution requiring that the regime in Tehran meet its international obligations. Iran must abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions.

Despite what the regime tells you, we have no objection to Iran's pursuit of a truly peaceful nuclear power program.

We're working toward a diplomatic solution to this crisis. And as we do, we look to the day when you can live in freedom -- and America and Iran can be good friends and close partners in the cause of peace.
IOW: It's your choice, Iranian mullahs: be good or we will bomb the hell out of you! (Unless the people can free themselves of your evil tyranny first.)

UPDATE: MORE HERE.

THE GRAND MUFTI ADMITS MUSLIMS ARE LIKE WIFE-BEATERS WHO BLAME THEIR WIVES
HAARETZ:
The mufti of Jerusalem, Mohammed Hussein, urged Palestinians to stop their attacks on churches, but held the pontiff responsible for the outpouring of Muslim anger.
This is exactly like the wife-beating husband who blames his wife for his violent rages: "It was her fault, officer! She doesn't effin' listen!"

Natch: Muslim men are raised by a creed which hallows wife-beating and "honor"-killing. And any religion which hallows wife-beating and "honor"-killing can never be expected to be peaceful to those it considers infidels.

HAARETZ, contunued:
Seven churches in the West Bank and Gaza were attacked following Benedict's comments. Damage was minor and no one was hurt, but it unsettled the small Christian minority, which accounts for about 2 percent of the 3.4 million Palestinians.
Much much more of the local population was once Christian. Most have left since Arafat and his Palistani islamothugs took over. COINCIDENCE!? Yeah, right.

AND GET THIS: Arafatistan was once the 4th fastest growing economy in the world - BEFORE Arafat. THAT'S RIGHT: from 1967-1990 - UNDER ISRAELI "OCCUPATION". Which proves that islamothuggery is the violent road to poverty, ignorance, and chaos.

DETAINEES AND THE MARQUIS OF QUEENSBERRY
Sowell/via Dr. Sanity:
When you enter a boxing ring, you agree to abide by the rules of boxing. But when you are attacked from behind in a dark alley, you would be a fool to abide by the Marquis of Queensbury rules. If you do, you can end up being a dead fool.
RTWT. BOTH OF THEM.

Monday, September 18, 2006

CHAVEZ BRINGS AHMADINEJAD AND ANTI-SEMITISM TO VENEZUELA
JPOST:
Already, graffiti is appearing on the Mariperez synagogue with increasing frequency. As a safety precaution, Levy skipped out on an office visit to the synagogue last Monday to avoid colliding with a pro-government march.

Critics claim that Chavez owes his anti-Semitic credentials to his late mentor, Norberto Ceresole, an Argentine ideologue who was well-known for his neo-Nazi views. But Chavez has only recently aimed his vitriol at Israel as he seeks friends in the Middle East, especially in Damascus and Teheran, both of which he visited in the last two months.

The recent wave of anti-Semitism has Venezuelan Jews, used to acceptance, rather nervous. Some even accuse Chavez of bringing in Hizbullah to indoctrinate Wayuu Indians in the west of the country.

"The government has adopted an anti-Semitic policy," explained Eppel.
More on Hizballah in Venezuela here. (Of course, Hizballah is a part of the Iranian jiahdist machine - which Chavez and Fidel have embraced, literally and figuratively.)

9/29/06 - UPDATE: Gateway has more.

IS ANOTHER WAVE OF EUROPEAN IMMIGRATION TO THE USA ON THE HORIZON?
IT'S AN OLD PATTERN: IMMIGRANTS FROM EUROPE COMING TO THE USA TO ESCAPE PERSECUTION BY RELIGIOUS BIGOTS.

This was the case for the Pilgrims in the 17th C, and for the Jews in the 19th and 20th C - and for many in between.


It's happening again - but this time the religious bigots are islamic, aided and abetted by Leftist appeasers. First Ayaan Ali Hirsi fled Europe. Now, Theo Van Gogh's only son is under serious threat. Will he be forced to flee, too?

If those who speak out against islamofascism are all targeted, and then flee, all that will SOON be left in Europe will be the Muslims and their cowering, apologizing dhimmis, (like Benedict, it sadly seems).

UPDATE: proof of an economically motivated emigration boom beginning HERE. VIA DISSECTING LEFTISM.

Many are already fleeing Europe's high taxes - brought on by the Left. Soon many more may flee dhimmitude, also brought on by the Left.

More HERE and HERE - on the confluence of dhimmitude and taxes of the Left in France.

The Myth of Containment
Many on the Left argue that it was wrong to attack Saddam - despite his obvious violations of 17 UNSCR's - because he was "contained".

And many of these same people now argue that we can contain a nuclear-armed Iran, too.

They use the containment of the USSR as the foundation of their argument, saying - in effect - that "if we could contain the USSR, then we could've continued to contain Saddam"; and therefore, the war was unnecessary, and unnecessarily upset the Islamic world (creating new jihadis where there might have been none) and diverting our resources away from al Qaeda."

This argument is deeply and entirely flawed.

First, the USSR was never contained. From 1945-1980 Soviet hegemony grew in geographical and demographical domination every single year; in fact, until Reagan, many analysts thought that the Soviet system was proving itself better than the free market.

REAGAN PROVED THEM WRONG, and systematically began the assertive pushback which culminated in the end of the USSR and the liberation of nearly a billion people living under Marxism, (more if one includes China - no longer a Marxist nation during Reagan's time in office). Reagan also revitalized the USA economy - proving that a free market is more efficient and creates more propserity than a centrally directed market.

Reagan did this in a few ways
: by ramping up the defense budget to levels the Soviet economy could not sustain, and by preventing the Soviet Union from gobbling up any more nations/economies - in order to use their asset to pay off their debt - (as a mismanaged conglomerate might). Reagan did this by challenging the Soviets in Afghanistan and Granada and Nicaragua and elsewhere. It worked; they caved.

Saddam was contained about as well as we contained the USSR - which is to say, he not very well contained at all. He actively and openly supported Jihadoterrorism in Gaza and the West Bank. He gave shelter to al Qaeda leadership - even publicly offering it to Bin Laden. He shot at US military forces nearly everyday - an act of war. And he committed genocide and torture against millions of Iraqis. And he devasted the marshes. His presence required that we keep troops in Saudi Arabia (to enforce The Carter Doctrine) - a major recruiting tool of al Qaeda, which wanted us out of the Kingdom. And he had completely corrupted the Oil For Food Program. He was in flagrant violation of the Armistice which ended the 1991 Gulf War - his secret missle program, and the 700 sarin and mustard gas shells found there since 2003 prove this beyond any reasonable doubt. Violating an armistice is a casus belli.

In other words, the status quo was not as good as the containment crowd wants you to believe.

Now this crowd wants you to believe that we can contain a nuclear Iran. As if we HAD contained the USSR and Saddam. As if we COULD contain a theocratic tyranny which has direct ties to the worst terrorist organizations in the world, especially to Hizballah - which, until 9/11, had killed more US citizens than any other tterrorist group in the world.

Iran cannot be deterred by M.A.D. - because they love their martial creed more than they love life - and they cannot be prevented from giving their nukes to jihadoterrorist cells anywhere in the world. (BTW: THIS IS A THREAT SADDAM USED IN 1990 - TO TRY TO DETER A US RETALIATION FOR HIS INVASION OF KUWAIT.)

Therefore, arguing that we can contain a nuclear Iran is delusional on every level. It undeservedly aggrandizes containment, and it undeservedly credits Iran with a sense of self-preservation. The mullahs are only interested in the supremacy of their brand of Islam, not in the survival of Iran - or any other part of the world.

That's why we must preemptively neutralize the Iranian nuclear threat - BEFORE it fully matures. When it has fully matured, it will be too late.

That's why I hope Bush doesn't waste too much more time with the UN. Chirac has effectively vetoed sanctions (nevermind war), so there is little the UNSC can really do.

We must ACT. If the USA doesn't act in time, the whole world will suffer for generations to come.

Anti-Bushies create a new crime: "Conspiracy to Commit a Non-criminal Act"
Apparently, that was what Fitzgerald was investigating - since he knew that leaking Plame's name and job was NOT a crime - at least according to JUST ONE MINUTE, and his excellent analysis of the brilliant assault on Wilson and Corn and Fitzgerald by Victoria Toensing. RTWT.

ISLAM: RELIGION OF THUGS
THE BOTTOM-LINE FROM MALKIN'S LAST POST:
... they burn the cross and firebomb Christian churches because they know they have nothing to lose--not their heads, their lives, anything. But if we so much as drop a Koran, joke about Muslims, or draw Mohammed...
SAY NO MORE.

CHIRAC SUPPORTS AHMADINEJAD
BBC:
French President Jacques Chirac has said referring Iran to the UN Security Council is not the best way to resolve a crisis over its nuclear programme.

"I don't believe in a solution without dialogue," Mr Chirac told Europe-1 radio, urging countries to remove the threat of sanctions against Iran. ... he said. "I think that Iran is a great nation and that we can find solutions through dialogue."

The US is leading calls for sanctions to be imposed on Iran if it refuses to suspend uranium enrichment.
I think that Chirac is deliberately sucking up to the mullahs in anticipation of his indictment on the day his term as president expires (and with it his immunity from criminal charges of corruption): he nneds to esacpe to a nation which won't send him back to the EU for trial: he will probably take up residence in Iran.Either that or it's just another example of French perfidy. Or both. In fact, France has long used it's veto on the UNSC to triangulate and win deals with nations which the USDA has tried to isolate. SIMPLY PUT: they're greedy corrupt scum.

LET'S BE REAL: Chirac is opposed to force and he's opposed to sanctions. So what, exactly does that leave, except harshly worded letters & speeches!? Pol's like Chirac aren't worth a drop of spit. WHY?! Because the effective result of Chirac's position is the empowerment of Ahmadinejad and the mullahs of Iran and their nuclear dreams.

ROMNEY GETS IT; MCCAIN DOES NOT
NYTIMES/HAT TIP THE CORNER:
Governor Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, said in an interview that he disagreed with Mr. McCain, and offered a forceful endorsement of Mr. Bush.

“I am foursquare behind the president on this,” Mr. Romney said. “I believe that we should do everything possible to support those people at the front line who are responsible for enforcing the war on terrorism.” ... Mr. Romney has been making an increasingly vigorous challenge for conservative votes and is viewed by many Republicans as the strongest challenger to Mr. McCain, at least for now. He saw the interrogation debate as an opportunity to draw contrasts with Mr. McCain among conservative voters.

Asked if this was his sharpest difference with Mr. McCain, Mr. Romney said: “No. There are a number of things. We have different views on McCain-Feingold, differing views on immigration policy, differing views on the interrogation of terrorists. There are also many other areas where we see eye to eye.”

Told about Governor Romney’s position on the treatment of terrorism suspects, Mr. McCain noted tartly, “He doesn’t have a vote.”

AHMADINEJAD ... ALL FARKED UP!
Check out the latest hilarious photoshop session - via My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, which has tons of other way cool stuff.

AND REMEMBER: We can do this here in the West - even of BusHitler and his "poodle" Blair. But they can't do this in Iran - or Cuba or North Korea or Zimbabwe or China... or Hizballahstan, or Arafatistan, or Waziristan, or... you get the idea.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

THE EPITOME OF THE IDIOTARIAN LEFT: PEACENIKS STAGE RALLIES TO PRESSURE THE USELESS UN ON DARFUR
BBC:
Protesters demanding an end to conflict in Sudan's Darfur region are staging a day of demonstrations around the world.

Activists are rallying in several capitals, calling on Sudan to allow UN peacekeepers into Darfur, where tens of thousands of people have been killed.
If these "protesters" really wanted to end the genocide then they'd GIVE UP ON THE USELESS UN, and demand that the USA and the UK set up a new "Coalition of the Willing" to bomb the hell out of the Sudanese who are perpetrating the genocide.

YEAH: BOMBING TO END GENOCIDE. IT WORKS. And it was regarded as the right thing to do when a Liberal Democrat - BJ Clinton - was president, and he bombed Serbia until Milosevic went to Ohio and signed the Dayon peace Accord, ending the Bosnian genocide.

Too bad the "protesters" hate Bush more than they hate genocide. Too bad the "protesters" love the UN more than they hate genocide.

The reason these "protesters" overvalue the UN is because as post-modern Leftists they don't believe in universal values. Therefore, to them, the only moral basis for international miltary intervention is if-and-when there is an international/cross-cultural unanimity, unanimity achieved at the UN - something which is virtually impossible.

Deep down these "protesters" know this. But they don't care; protesting let's them off the hook, morally speaking - a least in their own sick, morally relativist, Leftist minds.

REPEAT: If you really want to end the genocide, you should be petitioning Bush and Rumsfeld to BOMB THE CRAP OUT OF THE SUDANESE GOVERNMENT.

Peace Through Victory. Victory Through Superior Kinetic Force.

BIRDS OF A FEATHER - PART 21: CHAVEZ AND AHMADINEJAD
NON-ALIGNED MY ASS: THE LEFT AND ISLAMONAZISM ARE UNITED:
On arrival at Caracas airport, President Ahmadinejad took Mr Chavez's hands and said: "I salute all the revolutionaries who oppose world hegemony." He added: "The distance between our countries may be a bit far, but the hearts and thoughts are very close. "We have a common thinking, common interests."
Heck, they don;t just admit it; THEY BRAG ABOUT IT. And there a huge photo of Chavez and Ahmadinekad hugging; (IS Congressman Delahunt jealous? IS SHEEHAN JEALOUS? IS DHIMMI CARTER??). Why don't ALL the eurolefties and USA's Left-wingers - who now run the Democrat Party - come out of the closet and embrace Chavez and Ahmadinejad? Sheehan has publicly embraced Chavez and called Bush a tyrant. MAYBE SHE AND HER LEFT-WING ACOLYTES SHOULD GO TO TEHRAN, AND KISS UP TO THE MULLAHS!?

UPDATE: Of course, Ahmadinejad kissed Fidel's ass while in Cuba. And bragged about it. TOTALITARIANS LOVE EACH OTHER! And they all have a similar effect on their country - increasing poverty and decreasing human rights. After all, tyranny is the road to serfdom. As we are fond of saying: prosperity is a by-product of liberty and justice.

HOPE FOR SWEDEN?
Sweden is overrun with socialists, jihadists and dhimmis (a confluence which is no coincidence; just read Bat Y'eor). On it's current path, it might even become the first European nation with areas under sharia. But there is hope; there's national election there and conservatives might win! BBC:
... Opinion polls have put the centre-right alliance, headed by the conservative Moderate party, consistently neck-and-neck with Prime Minister Goran Persson's Social Democrats. The latest poll, published before voting began, put the challengers a few points ahead.Fredrik Reinfeldt, urged supporters to turn out and vote: "Don't believe the opinion polls. Persuade neighbours and friends to go vote."

... The opposition says changes to Sweden's rigid labour market and high cost welfare system are long overdue, and promises to cut both employer taxes and unemployment benefits. It also wants to cut the large social sector, which currently employs 30% of the Swedish job force.

Mr Reinfeldt, the Moderate leader, has accused the government of disregarding the high unemployment rate, and for not making sure the country can continue to compete in a global market. The government maintains the unemployment rate is a low 6%, while the opposition says it is around 10%, taking into account the many people on sick leave and in job training schemes.
I pray the conservatives win.

UPDATE/VIA PJM: YAY: GOOD GUYS WIN ONE!
UPDATE #2: IT'S OFFICIAL.

COWARDLY JIHADIST SCUM MURDER NUN IN SOMALIA
BBC:
Gunmen have shot dead an Italian nun in the Somali capital Mogadishu, witnesses and medical workers have said.

The attackers shot the nun three times in the back in a hospital in the south of the city, also killing her bodyguard before fleeing the scene.

The nun, who has not been named, is believed to be in her seventies.

It is unclear whether the shooting is connected with strong criticism by radical Somali clerics about the Pope's recent comments on Islam.

Hardline cleric Sheikh Abubakar Hassan Malin on Friday told worshippers at his mosque to hunt down and kill whoever offended the Prophet Mohammed.
These jihadist sc*mb*gs are the lowest form of life. They are evil scum bred by an evil creed which should be wiped off the face of the earth.

UPDATE/ROUND-UP/LINKS - 9:22AM: MALKIN.

Synagogue Attacked in Norway
NYT/"Reuters":
Shots were fired at a synagogue in central Oslo early on Sunday and police said they were investigating whether the incident was linked to religious hatred. ... "It seems some of the shots hit the synagogue,'' said Bjoern Christian Joergensen, a police spokesman. Asked if the shooting was connected to religious intolerance, he said: "We are keeping all options open and investigating this possibility."

The Mosaic Religious Community, which owns the synagogue, had asked for better protection of its property following threats and after the site was vandalised in early August. ... "This is the last in a series of incidents this summer whose purpose, it seems, is to scare us," Anne Sender, the leader of the Mosaic Religious Community, told Reuters. She said Oslo had an active Jewish community of around 800 members and the same number of non-practising Jews.
There are nearly 50,000 Muslims in Norway. And 1600 JOOOOOOOOOOZE. And the PC police haven't a clue if this incident was anti-Semitic - or who might've done it. Sheesh. They're dhimmi scum.

Saturday, September 16, 2006

ISLAMIC REACTION TO POPE'S STATEMENT: "No truth please, we're brutish."
Benedict didn't give them hell; he just told them the truth, and they just think it's hell.

Dalrymple (on the cartoon riots, but it is applicable here, as well):
The supposition that the kind of people who call publicly for beheadings, or tell Europe to prepare itself for the real holocaust (the connection between Muslim extremism and Holocaust denial being a very strong one), will feel placated by a few expressions of sympathy for their supposedly offended feelings is psychologically preposterous and demonstrably false empirically. It is the reductio ad absurdum of the Clintonian propensity to feel other people’s pain as a substitute for a policy.

At some point, we shall have to confront the threat directly, unapologetically and vigorously. If we don’t, it will be our own pain that we shall feel, not the pain of other people. And, in a sense, we shall have got what we asked for.
Bush (and Olmert) have been way too easy on these islamofascists. REPEAT: they do not warrant apologies; they need a real ass-kicking, and then a force-feeding of a big can of STFU.

A NOTE ON THE NEXT TWO POSTS...
THE NEXT POST DOWN REVEALS PERSONAL ANGER FROM A CHRISTIAN WHO IS RESPONDING TO REAL THREATS OF REAL VIOLENCE MADE BY JIHADISTS ALL OVER THE WORLD - IN RESPONSE TO THE WORDS OF BENEDICT.

THE POST AFTER THAT ONE REVEALS THAT JIHADISM - WHICH SEEKS TO IMPOSE ISLAM THROUGH VIOLENCE AND INTIMIDATION - IS AT THE VERY CORE OF ISLAM.

BENEDICT VERSUS MOHUMMED: CATHOLICS CAN GET ANGRY, TOO
4RWW's: If you don't like harsh words, then cover your ears and skip this link. If you want to read the truth posing as a rant, then use it.

ISLAM: The Bloodlust of Their Barbaric Creed
VIA JAWA: in their own words - ON VIDEO.

It's not your father's Democratic Party
by Matthew Brooks - RJC

There are certain places one expects to find anti- Israel sentiments openly expressed, but a major U.S. political party is not one of them. Increasingly, though, we are seeing a radicalization in the Democratic Party and the anti-Israel sentiment which was once the mark of the leftist fringe now appears in major Democratic forums.

One example comes from former President Jimmy Carter, who sharply criticized Israel's actions against Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon. In an interview in Der Spiegel magazine (August 15, 2006), while the fighting in Lebanon was at its height, Carter said, "I don't think that Israel has any legal or moral justification for their massive bombing of the entire nation of Lebanon." He also told Der Spiegel, "I think I represent the vast majority of Democrats in this country. I think there is a substantial portion of American people that completely agree with me."

Sadly, Carter is not alone. Remarks like his are not the opinions of a few random politicians, but regrettably represent the views of the grassroots of the Democratic Party.

Recent polling has shown a sharp disparity between Republicans' and Democrats' support for Israel. A NBC/Wall Street Journal poll in late July also showed a strong gap between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to support for Israel. The poll showed that among Republicans, an overwhelming 84% say they sympathize more with Israel (1% sympathize more with Arab states); by comparison, just 43% of Democrats do so (12% sympathize more with Arab states).

Democrats can no longer claim to be strong supporters of Israel. In a poll by the Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg at the very end of July, when asked whether the U.S. should be more neutral in the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah or whether the U.S. should align itself with Israel, Democrats supported neutrality over alignment, 54% to 39%. However, by comparison, Republicans strongly supported alignment with the Jewish state 64% to 29%.

These poll results follow several recent political developments that should also worry Jewish Democrats.

MCCAIN PUTTING HIS AMBITION AHEAD OF OUR SECURITY
McCain's proposal on detainees is NOT meant to make us safer and more secure; it's meant to help him become president - by mollifying the Dems/doves/Lefties he loves to coddle, as he did with McCain-Feingold, (the biggest assault on free speech in our nation's history).

McCain was a POW to a nation whch was a signatory of the Geneva Conventions at a time when the USA was NEVER even accused of violating the Geneva Conventions, and that did not stop the Vietnamese commies from brutally torturing him.

SO... what makes him think that alQaeda - a non-signatory - will gives a rat's ass how we treat detainees!? After all, alQaeda routinely beheads journalists and even female Muslim charity workers.

McCain is not a dope; he KNOWS this, that's why I am sure his whole entire goal on this issue is purely selfish. He's trying to capture the modrate/centrist position for his race for the WH.

It's more proof that McCain is scum. Like Powell and his protege Armitage - who happens to be an advisor to his campaign.

MORE HERE.


Friday, September 15, 2006

Benedict vs Mohummed
AHHHHHHHH! THE IRONY:
A wave of Muslim outrage is sweeping the globe after Pope Benedict linked Islam with violence.
Benedict did not give Islam hell; he spoke the truth; they just think it's hell. And they're reacting to his words the way they react to everything they don't like: WITH GENOCIDAL RAGE AND VIOLENCE.

I think it's obvious that rage and inhumanity to non-believers (and to their own women) are the most common attributes of Islam. Heck, they friggin riot over cartoons!

WHAT TYPE OF CREED GENERATES THESE KINDS OF BEHAVIORS - ALL THE TIME, ALL OVER THE WORLD? An evil creed.


Jesus spoke about creeds - false creeds and false prophets. What he said is very instructional. Matthew 7:6-20:
You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes, nor figs from thistles, are they?

Even so, every good tree bears good fruit; but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.

Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will know them by their fruits.
What are the fruits of Islam? How did it spread from Arabia to Christian North Africa and to Asia? Clues here. And here. And here.

I think it's obvious that by Jesus's measure one must conclude that Mohhumed was a false prophet. This shouldn't surprise anyone - even Muslims; after all, the Quran even relates how Mohummed couldn't even tell the difference between Gabriel and Satan. And that God NEVER spoke to him. Unlike Moses.

MORE on Benedict and Muslim reaction HERE.

FITTINGLY: Fallaci - who died today (see below) - liked Benedict, (Ratzinger as she continued to call him); she even had an audience, and said this of his books:
I feel less alone when I read the books of Ratzinger.
"Ratzinger"must fight and win if Europe is to be reborn, and Eurabia be stillborn. This kerfuffle is a test.

BTW: Hillary and Rosie (and most of the atheistic Left) falsely equate Chirtianity with Islam.

QUESTION: WILL THE JIHADISTS NUKE AMERICA?
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists/Graham Allison:
Faced with the possibility of an American Hiroshima, many are paralyzed by a combination of denial and fatalism. Either it hasn't happened, so it's not going to happen; or, if it is going to happen, there's nothing we can do to stop it. Both propositions are wrong. The countdown to a nuclear 9/11 can be stopped, but only by a combination of imagination, a clear agenda for action, and fierce determination to pursue it.
Graham Allison is director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government. He is author of Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe (2004).
ANSWER: YES, IT COULD HAPPEN. AND WILL UNLESS WE TAKE ACTION.

BIRDS OF A FEATHER - part 20: the so-called "non-aligned" nations: a gang of thugs
Scum. And Kofi is there, of course - beaming and shaking hands. Scum. Tyrnats, thugs, crooks, Marxists, jihadists. Scum.

AND WHILE HE'S THERE, DOES KOFI TALK ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS WOITHING THE "NON-ALIGNED" NATIONS, (ZIMBABWE, CUBA, VENEZUELA, NORTH KOREA - FOR STARTERS)? NO.

HE TALKED ABOUT THE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZE
! And how they should each expand the welfare state. Sheesh.


More HERE.

Oriana Fallaci
She was a passionate defender of universal human rights. A great writer. And beautiful. She will be missed. More HERE. 2005 WSJ article/interview HERE.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

BIRDS OF A FEATHER - PART 19: DEMOCRATS AND CAIR
SAY ANYTHING - (VIA CUANAS):
... there are 154 Democrats in the House of Representatives who get a 100% rating from the terror apologists at CAIR. Currently there are 201 Democrats total in the House, which means that a full 76%, more than 3/4’s, of them get the CAIR stamp of approval.

On the flip side, there’s only 8 Republicans who get CAIR’s approval out of the 231 GOP’ers in the House. That’s 3.5%.
Think about that. It's STUNNING, really. Three out of four Dems get a 100% rating from jihad's biggest apologists - the Council on American Isalmic Relations. THAT'S 75%! While only 4 out of 100 GOP'ers do.

OBVIOUSLY, the work that the Dove-o-crat appeasers have done to weaken the counter-attack AGAINST jihad is GREATLY APPRECIATED!

BOTTOM-LINE: if you support (appease/apologize for/excuse) jihad and Binladen, then vote Democrat.

MORE EXPERTS BEGIN TO AGREE: ISRAEL WON THE HIZBALLAH WAR
The CAPT: Arabs Increasingly See Lebanon As A Loss
At the imposition of the UN Security Council cease-fire resolution... Most analysts insisted that Israel's failure to destroy Hezbollah amounted to a humiliation...These analysts would be surprised to learn that Arabs increasingly view Hezbollah's war as a disaster as well -- but a disaster for Arabs:
JPOST: "... opinion in the Arab world has shifted to more sober analysis, as Lebanon, Hizbullah and the Shi'ites face the daunting task of what will probably be years of multi-billion dollar reconstruction.

Even a cursory perusal of the Arab press, will reveal that Hizbullah's status in Lebanon has changed for the worse, as many Lebanese come to the rather shocking realization that the south of their country, unknown to them, had in fact been transformed into an Iranian and Syrian launching pad against Israel posing an existential threat to their own livelihoods and to their entire country.
AS I SAID AT THE TIME: The war was fought badly and ended too soon, but it went much better for Israel than for the jihadoterrorists. Instead of of winning by a knockout, the IDF won a TKO - because the ref called the fight. That won't happen the next time these two fighters get into the ring.

THE ENEMY WITHIN: GLIB; SMUG; LEFTIST; DEFEATIST WORSHIPERS OF VICTIMHOOD
DAVID WARREN:
Our real enemy is within us, in the immense constituency of the half-educated narcissists pouring from our universities each year -- that glib, smug, liberal, and defeatist "victim culture" itself, that inhabits the academy, our media, our legal establishment, the bureaucratic class. The opinion leaders of our society, who live almost entirely off the avails of taxation, make their livelihoods biting the hands that feed them, and undermining the moral order on which our solidarity depends.
RTWT.

CARTER URGES DEFEAT OF LIEBERMAN
We can add Jimmy Carter to the list of Leftist, anti-Semite doves who have gone out of their way to oppose Lieberman and support Lamont.

NEWSMAX:
"He was one of the originators of public statements that misled the American people into believing that the Iraqi war was justified," the former Democratic president said on CNN's "Larry King Live."
Which is a LIE. (Or, if it's true about Lieberman, then it's equally true of Clinton, Hillary, Gore, Daschle and almost every other Democrat who served in the Senate between 1992 and 2000: IT WAS UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED THAT SADDAM HAD WMD. AND IT IS A FACT THAT SADDAM WAS IN VIOLATION OF UNSCR#1441.

Carter is just an old decrepit tyrant-appeasing Leftie-dove who is absolutely totally entirely full of crap. And directly responsible for the creation of Ayatollahstan.

Carter joins Moulitsas, Sheehan, and Schiavo in criticizing Lieberman. Lamont is obviously in BIG with the anti-Semite crowd of appeasers and defeatists. Lieberman should wear the Carter snub as a badge of honor.

NOTE: More proof that Iraq was a good and just and necessary cause HERE (proof that the Iraq War was always central to the GWOT) and HERE (proof that Saddam was in violation of UNSCR$1441) and HERE (proof that most of the Leftie-dove criticisms of the Iraq War - and by extension Lieberman's support for it - are totally bogus).

UPDATE: While in the UK Carter went out of his way to ATTACK BLAIR. Carter is a sc**bag.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

BLAIR SPEAKS TRUTH TO POWER: "ANTI-AMERICANISM IS MADNESS"
BBC:
The "anti-American feeling" of some European politicians is "madness" as the world needs the US to help tackle pressing problems, Tony Blair claims. There is a danger some countries will "pull up the drawbridge and disengage", the prime minister said in a pamphlet published by the Foreign Policy Centre. And he said while the "war on terror" is "unconventional", it can be won by promoting values as much as force.
Right on! Too bad he's been shoved aside before the war is over. WHAT IS IT WITH THE BRITS, ANYWAY?!?! They shoved aside Churchill before VJ Day; Thatcher was overthrown during the Gulf War, and now Blair ahs been effectively forced out right in the middle of the GWOT.

I think it's their ISLAND MENTALITY: as soon as they feel that their little island is safe they bug out. Pity. And the sad thing is that the Tories are pandering to anti-Americanism, too. WHERE ARE THE BRAVE POLITICIANS OF EUROPE?! Long gone - a result of deeply ingrained post-modernism which has it's roots in the terrible costs of WW1.

Which is why - along with their declining demographics, and unpayable future government debt - odds are that Europe will go the way of Byzantium: Paris will become Paristanbul; London - Londonistan.

BIRDS OF A FEATHER - part 18
ISM: Leftists posing as peace-niks who are really aiding and abetting jihadoterror and genocide.

More on the Leftist/ISM/jihadoterrorist connections HERE. And HERE.

ARMITAGE LEAKED TO BOLSTER WILSON AND HURT BUSH
THE AMERICAN THINKER:
A.J. Strata draws our attention to Robert Novak fighting back against the deceptions of Richard Armitage. (Via Drudge)
Novak, attempting to set the record straight writes:
“First, Armitage did not, as he now indicates, merely pass on something he had heard and that he ‘thought’ might be so. Rather, he identified to me the CIA division where Mrs. Wilson worked, and said flatly that she recommended the mission to Niger by her husband, former Amb. Joseph Wilson. Second, Armitage did not slip me this information as idle chitchat, as he now suggests. He made clear he considered it especially suited for my column.”
Novak slams Armitage for holding back all this time.

Armitage’s silence for “two and one-half years caused intense pain for his colleagues in government and enabled partisan Democrats in Congress to falsely accuse Rove of being my primary source,” Novak explains.
FACT: Armitage was anti-Iraq War.

I assert that he leaked Plame's ID and her role in the Wilson mission in order to BOLSTER Wilson's cred's. When Cheney and Libby Rove became SUSPECTS (a secondary and unplanned for side-effect of the leak), Armitage kept silent because HE WAS HAPPY HE'D HURT THEM - AND BUSH. And Powell played along.

This is the ONLY scenario which explains everything. It passes Ockham's Razor.

NOVAK'S ARTICLE HERE
.

ISRAEL: PUPPETEER OR ALLY?
Mearsheimer and Sears and Sheehan and Moore and a dozen Democrat members of Congress are anti-Semites who believe that Israel (or the Likud, the neocons, or the JOOOOOOZE!) control USA foreign policy. HERE ARE THE FACTS; via The Corner. Excerpt:
... repeated U.S. administrations came to power predisposed to associate with the Arab world and to disassociate from Israel. In the end, they all recognized that relations with the Arab states were not the inverse of those with Israel. Most came to acknowledge the worth of Israel as a steadfast ally in a volatile region.

The irony is that Israel was and is such a reliable ally because of shared cultural, religious, and intellectual affinities, the very qualities that so many "realist" officials in Washington downplay with pride and on principle when making decisions and devising policy on the Middle East.

... the importance of U.S.-Israeli relations is not the consequence of the strength of the Israel lobby, but rather the strength of the Israel lobby is a consequence of the importance of U.S.-Israeli relations.
The article has footnotes and facts. RTWT.

HUDSON INSTITUTE SYMPOSIUM ON THE UN AND THE GWOT
AWESOME SYMPOSIUM:
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Anne Bayefsky, Walid Phares, Michael Krauss, Natan Sharansky, John Bolton, Bill Bennett, Claudia Rosett, Jed Babbin, Bernard Lewis, Monica Crowley, Cliff Kincaid, Joseph Farah, Norman Podhoretz and his lovely wife, Midge Decter, Senator Colburn, Jed Babbin, Josh Muravchik, Bill Bennett, Karit Goldwasser - the wife of the kidnapped soldier Ehud Goldwasser, Alan Dershowitz, Senator Coleman AND PAMELA OF ATLAS!
And she has an awesome summary and awesome photos and awesome video and awesome audio. GO THERE NOW! DOWNLOAD NOW AND LISTEN AT YOUR LEISURE!

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

18 LEFTIST LIES DEBUNKED
EIGHTEEN LIES THE LEFT, THE MSM, AND THE DOVE-O-CRATS SPREAD. DEBUNKED.

Monday, September 11, 2006

ARE WE ON THE PATH FOR ANOTHER 9/11?
THE PATH TO 9/11: IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN STOPPED; IN FACT, THE ENTIRE JIHADOTERRORIST MOVEMENT MIGHT'VE BEEN NIPPED IN THE BUD.

IT MIGHT'VE BEEN NIPPED IN THE BUD:
BY CARTER (who let the jihadists takeover Iran in 1979, and was inept in his handlng of the hostage crisis and of Afghanistan);

BY REAGAN (who let Hizballah get away with mass murder in Beirut in 1983);

BY GHW BUSH (who let Saddam off the hook in 1991);

AND BY CLINTON (who missed the most chances: after the 1993 WTC attack, after Khobar, after the embassy bombings, after the USS COLE attack).
Glenn Reynolds posted this after watching THE PATH TO 9/11:
Well, we certainly could have saved ourselves a lot of trouble if we'd acted more vigorously in the 1990s. But hindsight is always 20/20.
I think we're making a similarly weak counter-attack to this day. That's why I feel we're the path to another 9/11 - only worse.

I think that Bush has done well in the GWOT, but he has not done enough. We could have been much more ruthless at Tora Bora, and Ramadi and Falluja and Najaf. We could have let Israel destroy Hizballah. He could EASILY be tougher on Putin and China and Iran and North Korea. And Saudi Arabia, and Syria and Lebanon.

DON'T GET ME WRONG: I am NOT saying that we're losing. We're winning, but not decisiely. WHY?! We're using half-measures which allow the enemy to retain more strength and maneuverability than he might otherwise have. It might even be enough for them to stage another huge and horrific attack. Here.

I feel that FDR and Truman and LBJ and Nixon were more ruthless in how they fought their wars, and that Bush (like GHW Bush in 1991, and Clinton in the Serbian War) has fought this war with one hand tied behind his back. Maybe it's a hangover form the Vietnam Syndrome? Maybe it's a result of all that "IRAQ=VIETNAM" defeatist BS/PR in the MSM and the DNC?

BOTTOM LINE: The way things are going now, in 2008 Glenn Reynolds will probably write:
"... we certainly could have saved ourselves a lot of trouble if we'd acted more vigorously in the last 8 years. But hindsight is always 20/20."
I hope not. I hope Bush stops fighting like a wussie and wimp. And soon.

9/11 REMEMBERED 24/7
LISTEN AND WATCH THIS.

THEN MULTIPLY BY THREE THOUSAND.

AND THEN TELL ME WHY WE'RE FIGHTING THIS ENEMY WITH ONE HAND BEHIND OUR BACK!?

FIVE YEARS LATER...
NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGIVE.

I think we've been counter-attacking with one hand tied behind our back. I wish we'd nuked Tora Bora on 2001, and fire-bombed Ramadi and Falluja. And we should have assassinated Saddam, Nasrallah and Al Sadr and Assad. But then.. we probably should've attacked Tehran in 1979, and assassinated Kaddafy and Khomeini. The world would be a better place.

The longer we wait - and the more we put off the inevitable, the worse the costs of the inevitable will become.

It's really time for a few more ultimatums. It's overdue. And then we must take decisive action. Military action. It's the least we can do for the victims of jihadoterror and for the defense of liberty.

God Bless Our Troops and the USA.

UPDATE: Ledeen, recollecting Barbara Olson (who died aboard the flight which hit the Pentagon - as did a relative of mine) echoes my feelings:
Barbara would have no time for any of the Bidens, Hagels, Lugars, Deans, Kennedys and Murthas who tell us we are wrong to be angry, wrong to seek the destruction of our enemies, wrong to advance freedom, wrong to defend our borders, wrong to use every technological miracle to discover and divine our enemies’ intentions, wrong to lock away captured killers.

She would spit at the very idea of coming to terms with those who want us dead or dominated. She would have cancelled her subscriptions to the New York Times and the Washington Post, because she would not want the poison in her house, and she would not want to give a nickel to the corrupt rich kids who own and guide the papers.

She would be right. And she must be avenged.
YES: She and all the vitims of jihadoterror must be avenged. And liberty and universal rights expanded, not diminished. As a revolutionary liberal intellectual says: FASTER, PLEASE!

UPDATE: HITCHENS AGREES:
"We"--and our allies--simply have to become more ruthless and more experienced. .. fight on the worst imaginable terrain, and gradually to learn how to confront, infiltrate, "turn," isolate and kill the worst imaginable enemy. These are faculties that we shall be needing in the future.
Kill them. Not negotiate. Kill. And demand that other Muslim nations cooperate or ... else, because you are either with us, or them. Like Lebanon and all the others... if they are not helping us kill the enemy, then they are the enemy.

It's the least we can do for the victims, and for the defense of our civilization.

Saturday, September 09, 2006

A SOUND WAY TO DECREASE THE NUMBER OF ABORTIONS
WASH POST:
On June 6, Cheryl Smith took her last $600 and drove her teenage daughter from Baltimore to Severna Park to get an abortion. When they got there, a receptionist told them the clinic had changed hands. The abortion provider had moved a few miles away, she said, but the new clinic would offer a pregnancy test and sonogram for free.

The Smiths stayed. After they saw a picture of the fetus at 21 weeks with arms and legs and a face, their thoughts of termination were gone.

... ultrasound exams have proven effective in convincing women to stay pregnant. A 2005 survey by Care Net, a Sterling-based network of about 1,000 antiabortion pregnancy centers in the United States and Canada, found that 72 percent of women who were initially "strongly leaning" toward abortion decided to carry their pregnancies to term after seeing a sonogram.
THEY DON'T SEE A SONOGRAM; THEY SEE A BABY. A BABY. A BABY HUMAN. THEIR BABY. THEIR CHILD. THEY SEE THEIR CHILD'S FACE. AT 21 WEEKS - WHEN MANY ABORTIONS ARE PERFORMED - THE BABY HAS A FACE. THE FACE PROBABLY LOOKS LIKE MOMMY'S AND DADDY'S. IT'S NOT A FACELESS FETUS. IT'S A BABY.

The additonal information the sonogram provides disrupts the denial upon which pro-abortion arguments are based. That's why this process works. It empowers the mother to see her pregnancy is not mere inconvenience, but motherhood. And it proves that adoption is the best answer to an unwanted pregnancy, not an abortion.

[ASIDE: AS I HAVE BLOGGED BEFORE: One day, a woman might also have the choice of freezing her embryo, and then implanting it when she wants the baby. Or donating it.]

Thursday, September 07, 2006

REMEMBER: 9/11 WAS DIABOLICAL AND THE WAR AGAINST THE EVIL-DOERS MUST GO ON
Would anyone care to really deny this fact: the 9/11 attacks were diabolical. Not political. Not anti-colonial. Not a counter-attack. But diabolical. Evil.

I know that Leftists have a hard time with this concept, because as post-modernists and moral relativists they pretend that there is not really any such a thing as evil. To Leftists, morality is in the eye of the beholder.

But not to realists. To realists, 9/11 was diabolical. The perpetrators - who portray themselves as religious fanatics - are false prophets, purveyors of an evil creed, an evil creed responsible for nearly all the terror in the world, and for the deaths of more Muslims than any other creed ever. They are evil. They believe that it is right to murder one's own daughter in order to restore honor to one's family. They are evil.

On the upcoming anniversary of 9/11, we should remember that the evil people who attacked us on that day cannot be reasoned with, or appeased, or negotiated with. They must be wiped off the face of the earth.

As Bush said on 9/20/01 - (excerpts):
Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated. Americans are asking, why do they hate us? They hate what we see right here in this chamber -- a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms -- our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.

They want to overthrow existing governments in many Muslim countries, such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan. They want to drive Israel out of the Middle East. They want to drive Christians and Jews out of vast regions of Asia and Africa.

These terrorists kill not merely to end lives, but to disrupt and end a way of life. With every atrocity, they hope that America grows fearful, retreating from the world and forsaking our friends. They stand against us, because we stand in their way.

We are not deceived by their pretenses to piety. We have seen their kind before. They are the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the 20th century. By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions -- by abandoning every value except the will to power -- they follow in the path of fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism. And they will follow that path all the way, to where it ends: in history's unmarked grave of discarded lies. (Applause.)

Americans are asking: How will we fight and win this war? We will direct every resource at our command -- every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence, and every necessary weapon of war -- to the disruption and to the defeat of the global terror network.

This war will not be like the war against Iraq a decade ago, with a decisive liberation of territory and a swift conclusion. It will not look like the air war above Kosovo two years ago, where no ground troops were used and not a single American was lost in combat.

Our response involves far more than instant retaliation and isolated strikes.

Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have ever seen.

It may include dramatic strikes, visible on TV, and covert operations, secret even in success. We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or no rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make.

Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.


... This is not, however, just America's fight. And what is at stake is not just America's freedom. This is the world's fight. This is civilization's fight. This is the fight of all who believe in progress and pluralism, tolerance and freedom.

We ask every nation to join us. We will ask, and we will need, the help of police forces, intelligence services, and banking systems around the world. The United States is grateful that many nations and many international organizations have already responded -- with sympathy and with support. Nations from Latin America, to Asia, to Africa, to Europe, to the Islamic world. Perhaps the NATO Charter reflects best the attitude of the world: An attack on one is an attack on all.

The civilized world is rallying to America's side. They understand that if this terror goes unpunished, their own cities, their own citizens may be next. Terror, unanswered, can not only bring down buildings, it can threaten the stability of legitimate governments. And you know what -- we're not going to allow it.

... I ask for your patience, with the delays and inconveniences that may accompany tighter security; and for your patience in what will be a long struggle.

... After all that has just passed -- all the lives taken, and all the possibilities and hopes that died with them -- it is natural to wonder if America's future is one of fear. Some speak of an age of terror. I know there are struggles ahead, and dangers to face. But this country will define our times, not be defined by them. As long as the United States of America is determined and strong, this will not be an age of terror; this will be an age of liberty, here and across the world.

... I will not forget this wound to our country or those who inflicted it. I will not yield; I will not rest; I will not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people.

The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain. Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war, and we know that God is not neutral between them.

Fellow citizens, we'll meet violence with patient justice -- assured of the rightness of our cause, and confident of the victories to come. In all that lies before us, may God grant us wisdom, and may He watch over the United States of America.
AMEN. God Bless Our Troops, and Our Commander in Chief. And May God Continue to Bless America.

HARRIET MYERS vs RICHARD ARMITAGE - a lesson in character
When it became clear that for many on the Right the Harriet Myers nomination was GWBush's "no new taxes" moment, and that it was hurting him politically, Harriet Myers did the honorable thing and withdrew her name.

When it became clear that the Plame Affair was damaging the GWBush and Cheney and Rove and the entire White House AND the war in Iraq, Armitage stayed quiet - letting Bush and Cheney and Rove twist in the wind. For years.

Myers - for all her faults - has character. Armitage (like his ol' boss Powell) is a pathetic weasel with none. MORE HERE.
COMPLETE ROUND UP HERE.

MORE PROOF THEY MURDERED TERRI SCHIAVO
NYTIMES:
A severely brain-damaged woman in an unresponsive, vegetative state showed clear signs of conscious awareness on brain imaging tests, researchers are reporting today, in a finding that could have far-reaching consequences for how unconscious patients are cared for and diagnosed.

In response to commands, the patient’s brain flared with activity, lighting the same language and planning regions that are active when healthy people hear the commands. Previous studies had found similar activity in partly conscious patients, who occasionally respond to commands, but never before in someone who was totally unresponsive.
The term and the condition "vegtative state" may turn out to be entirely bogus.

AND IT MAKES ME WONDER:
WHAT WAS TERRI THINKING AND FEELING AS THEY STARVED HER TO DEATH?
WHAT WOULD TERRI'S BRAIN-IMAGING TESTS HAVE SHOWN?
We'll never know. Her estranged and very Left-wing husband made sure of that.

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

SCIENTISTS DISCOVER ANOTHER NATURAL SOURCE FOR INCREASES IN LEVELS OF ATMOSPHERIC GREENHOUSE GASES
BBC:
Thawing Siberian bogs are releasing more of the greenhouse gas methane than previously believed, according to new scientific research. Scientists from Russia and the US measured methane bubbling from a number of thawing lakes. ... Methane's contribution to present-day global warming is second only to CO2.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that atmospheric concentrations are about two and a half times those seen in pre-industrial times. "Thaw lakes in north Siberia are known to emit methane, but the magnitude of these emissions remains uncertain," the scientists write.

"We show that methane flux from thaw lakes in our study region may be five times greater than previously estimated." ... Using radiocarbon techniques, the researchers showed that some of the escaping methane molecules had been formed more than 40,000 years ago.
Er, um... the methane was obviously frozen during the last Ice Age. Before that it was er... um... WARMER. And before that... cooler. You see, fluctuations of global climate are natural and pre-date industrialism and all other possible anthropogenic causes. The current warming trend may very well be an entirely - or juts mopstly - NATURAL event. And completely unavoidable.

This article points out once again that climatoloigist don't know more than they know. As in my previous posts about iron-deficient plankton and the old age of most trees in the Amazon, it proves that the models climatologists use are quite approximate - too the point of admitted gross inaccuracy. It's like they're just guessing!

MY POINT: If global warming is natural, the enacting draconian tax measures in order to limit industrialism in the hope/wish/prayer of slowing global warming is STUPID, and it won't accomplish a dang thing - except to cede power to governments and bureaucracies: whiuch just happens to be EVERY LEFTIST'S DREAM; (in fact, to the Leftiust, it's a TWOFER: they get to raise taxes AND cut industrialism).

OH, AND BTW: Even IF the thawing lakes are releasing MORE methane than previosuly estimated, and even IF this feedback is accelerating global-warming IT DOESN'T PROVE IT'S ANTROPOGENIC. It may all be natural.

DEMOCRAT DOVES PROMISE TO ABANDON IRAQ AS THEY DID SOUTH VIETNAM AND THE CONTRAS
CLICK HERE FOR PROOF. I predict that cutting off funding for the defense of the nascent democracy in Iraq will be the first thing "Speaker Pelosi" does. The second will be to start impeachment hearings.

I ask you two questions:
IS THAT WHAT THIS NATION NEEDS RIGHT NOW!? WILL THESE ACTIONS HURT THE ENEMY, OR AID AND ABET THE ENEMY!?
I'LL ANSWER YOU THIS WAY: if you want to help Osama and Hizballah, then vote Democrat.

BTW, the analogy is quite apt: the last US combat troops left South Vietnam on 3/29/73 (Vietnamization was working, then - AS IS IRAQIAZATION WORKING NOW). Saigon did not fall to the Marxist totalitarians of North Vietnam - in violation of the Peace Treaty - until 4/30/75 - TWO YEARS LATER ... and right after the Democrat doves who controlled Congress cut off the SVG froom all funding. They did the same thing to the Contras in 1982.

The Democrat doves will cut fiancing to Iraq and throw them to the tyrannical, jihadoterrorist wolves.

You know, if these Left-wing doves (who NOW control the Democrat Party) had been in power in 1950's, then they would have abadoned the South Koreans! These doves would've even let Krushchev keep nuclear missiles in Cuba in 1962! And not even tried to air-lift suppiles to Berlin as Truman did in 1948.

These courageous acts were too confrontational for the doves. Thank God that THEN, Democrats still had some folks who believed in a robust national defense. Hawkish Democrats like Truman and JFK. THIS IS NOT TRUE ANYMORE - NOT NOW THAT LIEBERMAN IS GONE.

And that's why I feel it might even get worse: I feel the Democrat doves will also cut support for Afghanistan, and suspend our special alliance with Israel, too - all in the name of appeasement - in the name of "trying to appear more even-handed", as if Israel and and democratic Afganistan were the moral equivalents of Al Qaeda and Hizballah!

This is why I feel the stakes are so very high in the coming election. I hope America doesn't retreat by electing a Democrat Party majority in EITHER the House or the Senate. It would be like re-electing Chamberlain in 1940!

HERE'S A LINK TO A WONDERFUL SHORT VIDEO - WITH TOUCHING IMAGES AND STIRRING WORDS AND MUSIC - WHICH PUTS THE CURRENT CROP OF DOVE-O-CRATS INTO THE PROPER PERSPECTIVE.

UPDATE: Here's a link to even more proof that the Democrat Party is now controlled by Left-wing doves and anti-Semites.

IS LEBANON WITH US OR AGAINST US?
"Reuters":
Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said on Wednesday that Hezbollah's continued detention of Israeli soldiers violated the Security Council resolution, and that Lebanon must act to release them unconditionally. "UN Security Council Resolution 1701, on which the cease-fire is based, calls unequivocally for an unconditional and immediate release of the soldiers being held hostage," he said.

"The continued holding of our soldiers is a grave violation of the cease-fire. A continuation of this violation will have consequences."
What will the consequencs be if there is a "buffer zone" populated with third party nations between the IDF and Hizballah? How might the IDF attack? I don't know. Will they ask that sanctions be placed on Lebanon and that all the aid money pledged to rebuild the shia south of Lebanon be put on hold? Probably this is the next move.

And at what point will Bush and Condi apply the same policy to Lebanon as it did to Afghanistan? We told the Taliban to give up al Qaeda or else. We should tell the same thing (more or less) to the Lebanese government: disarm Hizballah, and return the hostages, ... OR ELSE.

We should have one policy regarding states which harbor terrorists. Either a nation is with us or against us. If the Lebanese government won't disarm Hizballah and get the IDF soldiers released, then they should placd under sanctions and then - if that fails - bear the full brunt of an IDF and US military response.

ANNAN TO APPOINT ANTI-SEMITE AS MEDIATOR
JPOST:
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan has decided to appoint his former special adviser Lakhdar Brahimi to mediate a possible agreement for swapping Lebanese prisoners in return for freeing the reservists Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser, The Jerusalem Post has learned. Brahimi recently publicly expressed his support for talking directly with Hizbullah.
YUP: Lakhdar is BAD GUY: he's a cronie of Korrupt Kofi. He favors negotiating with jihadoterrorists, and he's an anti-Semite who once bragged that he had never shaken the hand of a JEW, and called Sharon a TERRORIST. And, his daughter was a correspondant in CNN's discredited (pro-Saddam) Baghdad bureau. And he played a terrible role in post-war iraq. AND OH YEAH: he thought it was fine to over-throw jihadis in his own country (Algeria, but not elsewhere) - which makes him nothing but a hypocrite. More on this s---bag HERE.

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

IRON-CLAD ELECTION PREDICTION: NO MATTER HOW THE GOP DOES, THE MSM WILL SAY, "BUSH LOST"
According to the MSM, Bush will lose - no matter what; it's a foregone conclusion. Here's how they'll spin it:
IF THE GOP DOES WELL, THEN THE MSM WILL SAY IT WAS IN SPITE OF BUSH'S LOW APPROVAL RATINGS AND A RESULT OF LOCAL ISSUES, CONCLUDING THAT "ALL POLTICS IS LOCAL." BUSH WILL WRITTEN OFF AS A LAME DUCK WHOSE NEOCON POLICIES WERE FINALLY REJECTED BY HIS OWN PARTY AND THE ELECTORATE. THEY WILL TALK ABOUT MCCAIN, AND MCCAIN, AND MCCAIN. AND HILLARY.

IF THE GOP DOES POORLY, THE MSM WILL BLAME BUSH AND NEOCON POLICIES. AND THEY WILL TALK ABOUT MCCAIN, AND MCCAIN, AND MCCAIN. AND HILLARY.
For a good technical analysis of the horse race click HERE. And always read Michael Barone and Jay Cost.

HAS OSAMA FINALLY BEEN CORNERED AND TRAPPED?
VOA:
... a NATO spokesman, Major Quentin Innesm said allied forces are closing in on Taleban guerrillas, pushing them into what he called "a bit of a trap."
FOX/AP:
U.S. artillery and airstrikes killed between 50 and 60 suspected Taliban militants on Tuesday, the fourth day of a NATO-led offensive in southern Afghanistan, a NATO spokesman said. ... NATO has already reported more than 200 Taliban killed in the operation. ... He said there had been no NATO or Afghan troop casualties.
UK TIMES:
The leaders of Pakistan and Afghanistan will attempt today to bury their differences and agree a joint strategy to combat Islamic militants operating on both sides of their border.

As Nato forces fought an estimated 700 Taleban rebels in southern Afghanistan, President Musharraf prepared to make his first visit to Kabul for nearly two years, where he hopes to repair relations with President Karzai.

“We hope it will be a major, positive step for relations between the two countries and for co-operation in fighting terrorism,” a spokesman for the Afghan Foreign Ministry said. Yesterday Pakistan took a big step towards ending the fighting in the lawless Waziristan region when it signed a peace deal with tribal leaders. The agreement commits local militants to halt attacks on both sides of the border.

In return Pakistan will reduce its military presence and compensate tribesmen whose relatives have been killed or whose properties have been damaged. A key provision of the deal is that tribesmen will expel foreign fighters from the area. The region is believed to be a haven for al-Qaeda fighters and members of the former Taleban regime in Afghanistan. Without a base in Pakistan their operations could be seriously disrupted.
The timing of the Paki/Waziri deal and the Paki-Afghani deal and the very high death rates for the Taliban (in the current NATO operation), and the understated quote from the NATO spokesman make me feel that Osama has finally been cornered.

UPDATE: HERE'S MY REASONING:
  • The NATO op - which they define as a trap - is a very large op and it's coming up against a very determined and very large contingent of Taliban. Perhaps they are defending Osama and or Zawahiri.
  • The Pakistan deal with the jirga/tribes of Waziristan has been portayed by many as a bad deal for us, but perhaps it isn't. If the tribes won't give safe haven to alQ then alQ must go to Afghanistan where NATO is waiting. If the tribes do not expel alQ then the deal is broken. In which case there is NO LOSS for us.
  • Musharraf is meeting with Karzai - this rapprochement is essential and good for our side; it would not occur if Karzai thought Pakistan was making a destabilizing deal with the Waziri tribes.
  • And don't forget that this big NATO action comes on the heels of numerous alQ biggies being taken down in the last 6 weeks. Which probably means that very good intel was acquired and is being exploited everywhere - even Pakistan and Waziristan and Afghanistan.
That's why I say, STAY TUNED.

ARMITAGE PROVES LIBBY OBSTRUCTED NOTHING
NYTIMES:
An enduring mystery of the C.I.A. leak case has been solved in recent days, but with a new twist: Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor, knew the identity of the leaker from his very first day in the special counsel’s chair, but kept the inquiry open for nearly two more years before indicting I. Lewis Libby Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, on obstruction charges.

Now, the question of whether Mr. Fitzgerald properly exercised his prosecutorial discretion in continuing to pursue possible wrongdoing in the case has become the subject of rich debate on editorial pages and in legal and political circles.
So, er, um... since Fitzgerald KNEW who the leaker was - and that the leak was NOT A CRIME, then WHAT EXACTLY WAS OBSTRUCTED!? Nothing. Zero. Zilch. Bupkus. Nada - as in "not a" damn thing.

The feds should drop the charges aganinst Libby and investigate FITZGERALD for abuse of power.

Monday, September 04, 2006

A TRUE AMERICAN HERO AND HIS DEEDS GO UNREPORTED - UNTIL NOW
LONSBERRY/ VIA NRO:
Accounts of American valor are dismissed by the press as propaganda, yet accounts of American difficulties are heralded as objectivity. It makes you wonder if the role of the media is to inform or to depress - to report or to deride. To tell the truth, or to feed us lies.
TO READ AN ACCOUNT OF TRUE AMERICAN VALOR YOU'LL HAVE TO CLICK HERE - BECAUSE YOU'LL NEVER SEE IT IN THE MSM.

2006 AND 1938
QUESTIONS:
CAN THE WEST LEARN FROM ITS MISTAKES? CAN WE ACCEPT THE FACT THAT THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE HAD WE STOPPED HITLER IN 1938? CAN WE STOP IRAN NOW, OR MUST WE SUFFER THROUGH THIS CENTURY'S VERSION OF WW2 - ONLY NUCLEAR?
ANSWER:
LOYOLA/NRO: Churchill understood, as so many pseudo-pacifists did not, that allowing Germany to alter the status quo in a way that gave it a huge offensive advantage guaranteed that the Nazis would attack when they were ready. He understood that the last moment for effective self-defense was Munich in 1938—when there was no imminent attack. The choice was preemption or appeasement. And likewise the choice Bush faces now. Waiting until an attack might be imminent is suicide.
Will Bush be another Chamberlain, or will he be another Churchill? There are plenty of Chamberlains around: Kofi getting an agreement from Assad to prevent Hizballah from are-arming comes to mind - as only the most recent of a whle series of Chamberlainesque acts, (like making deals with Kim Jong Il and letting Moki alSadr live).

Bush has until December 2008 to preemptively take out Iran's nuke assets. Between now and then he does niot have to run the table, but he has to keep the initiative. We are killing the enemy in Afghanistan, and things are getting better in Iraq. But if the GOP loses the House, the ALL BETS ARE OFF. WHY?! Because the Left-wing doves who run the Democrat Party and the House will do to the Iraqis and the Afghanis and the Israelis what they did to the South Vietnamese: cut funding, abandon them.

AND YEAH: I believe that the new New Democrat Party will abandon Israel because the new New DemocratParty is controlled by their wacky Left which believes the Mearsheimer crap. Which is why I think the GWOT will be won or lost in this years mid-term election. If the Democrats win then Osama wins.

WHICH POLITICIANS BELIEVE THAT BUSH IS EXACERBATING JIHADOTERROR?
TWO SETS OF POLITICIANS BELIEVE THAT BUSH'S "FORWARD-LEANING" POLICIES IN THE GWOT ARE ACTUALLY EXACERBATING JIHADOTERROR. HERE'S WHAT ONE ACTUALLY SAID:
"As America claims to be fighting terrorism, it implements policies that cause the intensification of terrorism and institutionalised violence,"
Who said that? Was it John Kerry or Ned Lamont? Was it Russ Feingold or Teddy Kennedy? Was it Glenn Greenwald or Markos Moulitsas? NOPE. None of the above. It was Mullah Khatami, the former frontman for the Iranian tyranny. And, it's exactly what the Democrat Left says. Which says EVERYTHING you need to know about the Democrat Left: they are aligned with our enemy. UPDATE: JAWA agrees:
Terrorists Love the Left:

If Islamofascism and the Religious Right have so much in common, then how come the terrorists never quote Pat Robertson? Instead, they are constanting quoting icons of the Left to support their positions. They even use clips from Fahrenheit 9/11 in this propaganda film. And when American Taliban Adam Gadahn decides to name drop, it isn't Jerry Falwell that he cites for moral authority. It's George Galloway, Robert Fisk, and Seymour Hersh.
GO TO JAWA: THE ACTUAL POST HAS THE HYPERLINKS WHICH PROVE THE IDEOLOGICAL LINKS BETWEEN THE LEFT AND THE ENEMY! MORE HERE.

Sunday, September 03, 2006

EUGENICS, EUTHANASIA AND THE LEFT
Leftists might be best defined as people who want to predetermine outcomes - they don't trust the marketplace, or individuals; they want the state to pick winners and losers. (If that's too oblique, then read two books by Hayek and call me in the morning!)

The ultimate outcome which a Leftist can control is LIFE AND DEATH. And when presented with this choice, the Leftist almost always come down on the dark side:
they favor abortion on demand; they favor euthanasia, and they favor life sentences for convicted MURDERERS.
Recently, Leftists in Massachusetts argued in favor of euthanizing/murdering a little girl who was in a coma as a result of child abuse. The Left argued - as they did in the Schiavo case - that she was "virtually brain-dead". People who wanted her to live won the legal battle. And now she is continuing her remarkable comeback. MORE HERE.

Also in the news this week is a new practice made available - RIGHT NOW - to people undergoing IVF, (but it could just as easily be made available to people conceiving naturally); it's called PGD - pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and it amount to SCREENING a propsective embryo/family member for potential diseases before implantation. EXCERPT:
[Critics say that...] It raises the specter of eugenics, they say, in the most personal terms. “It’s like children are admitted to a family only if they pass the test,” said Denise Toeckes, 32, a teacher who tested positive for a BRCA mutation. “It’s like, ‘If you have a gene, we don’t want you; if you have the potential to develop cancer, you can’t be in our family.’ ”

Other critics oppose preimplantation diagnosis on the grounds that it could be used to select against homosexuals, women or people with disabilities. It reduces people to their genes, they say, and paves the way for the pursuit of children designed to suit parental ideals and for discrimination against those born with perceived imperfections.
I think this is an apt description. This is eugenics, and it's amoral at best.

[ASIDE: Why does the Left consistently come down on the dark side!? Why do they favor euthanasia and abortion and appeasing the enemy!?

It's because they are moral relativists: lacking any belief in any universal truth or in universal and innate/God-given human rights, they have nothing that they feel is worth fighting for - or dying for --- OR EVEN LIVING FOR. Most Leftists just want third-party pay/universal healthcare, third-party pay retirement, and the right to have sex with anything that turns them on: whether it's the same gender or underage.

This moral relativism is, IMHO, a result of post-modernism. Post-modernism was an overreaction to WW1: confronted by that war's horrific casualties, post-modernists rejected nationalism, colonialism, capitalism and the West. This was when intellectuals began to become fixated with anti-West/anti-bourgeoise ideologies: Dadaism, Surrealism and Marxism. And it reignited their fixation on "primitive" culture and the Third World; they began to romanticize both, just as they demiograted traditonal Western values and mores. It's why the Left aggrandizes the murdererous thug and totalitarian Che.

Post-modernism and its concommittant moral relativism are currently predominant only because the Left has dominated the MSM and the Academy - and the perennial bureacracies within US State Department and the CIA - since the 1930's. This is why we must end the domination of the MSM over the newscycle, and why we must bring political parity back to the Academy. Only after the Left's stranglehold on these two organs of propaganda is ended will Leftism be relegated to the ashheap of history where it belongs.

Why am I so sure that Leftism will then vanish? Because without their stranglehold on the MSM and the Academy they will be forced to compete with post-Marxist/POST-post modernist philosphies ON AN EVEN PLAYING FIELD, and they will certainly, absolutely lose that competition.]

ZAWAHIRI VIDEO: CONVERT OR DIE
Zawahiri and his American stooge Adam Wutzhisname appeared together on a new video offering Americans two choices: convert or die.

This might be a warning/offering required by Islam before an impending mega attack. Maybe not. Or it might be a warning before a mega attack which is still years away. Who can say?


Anyhow, I think they left out a third choice for cowards: vote Democrat.

Saturday, September 02, 2006

SCIENTISTS NOW PREDICT MUCH LESS GLOBAL WARMING
THE AUSTRALIAN:
THE world's top climate scientists have cut their worst-case forecast for global warming over the next 100 years. ... The new projections put paid to some of the more alarmist scenarios raised by previous modelling, which have suggested that sea levels could rise by almost 1m over the same period. The report projects a rise in sea levels by century's end of between 14cm and 43cm, with further rises expected in following centuries caused by melting polar ice.
14 cm. YAWN. I think the planet and humanity can survive 14 cm. We have in the past. And as for stronger storms some forecast: these run in cycles anyhow - naturally, as does global-warming/global cooling.

I think it's time for the man-made global warming fearmongers to STFU.

Friday, September 01, 2006

THIS CARTOON PROVES 2 WORDS: HIZBALLAH LOST
VIA DR. SANITY: CLICK HERE.

THE PLAME AFFAIR: LIES. DAMNED LIES AND POLITICS
WASHPOST (hat tip DRUDGE):
End of an Affair: It turns out that the person who exposed CIA agent Valerie Plame was not out to punish her husband.

WE'RE RELUCTANT to return to the subject of former CIA employee Valerie Plame because of our oft-stated belief that far too much attention and debate in Washington has been devoted to her story and that of her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, over the past three years. But all those who have opined on this affair ought to take note of the not-so-surprising disclosure that the primary source of the newspaper column in which Ms. Plame's cover as an agent was purportedly blown in 2003 was former deputy secretary of state Richard L. Armitage.

Mr. Armitage was one of the Bush administration officials who supported the invasion of Iraq only reluctantly. He was a political rival of the White House and Pentagon officials who championed the war and whom Mr. Wilson accused of twisting intelligence about Iraq and then plotting to destroy him. Unaware that Ms. Plame's identity was classified information, Mr. Armitage reportedly passed it along to columnist Robert D. Novak "in an offhand manner, virtually as gossip," according to a story this week by the Post's R. Jeffrey Smith, who quoted a former colleague of Mr. Armitage.

It follows that one of the most sensational charges leveled against the Bush White House -- that it orchestrated the leak of Ms. Plame's identity to ruin her career and thus punish Mr. Wilson -- is untrue.
Wilson and Plame should be charged with treason: for partisan and personal gain they slandered the POTUS during war-time. Armitage should be charged with aiding and abetting. Fitzgerald should be disbarred.

Not only was the entire Plame Affair BS; but the original 16 words spoken by Bush in the SOTU (about British intel's awareness that Saddam had recently effrted to get uranium from Africa) remain true to this day.

KOFI IS A JERK: Claims Assad will enforce an arms embargo on Hizballah
NYTIMES:
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said Friday that Syria would step up border patrols and work with the Lebanese army to stop the flow of weapons to Hezbollah. Syria will increase its own patrols along the Lebanon-Syria border, and establish joint patrols with the Lebanese army ''when possible,'' Annan said after meeting with Syrian President Bashar Assad in Damascus. Assad made no public comments after their meeting, but Annan spoke with reporters at the Damascus airport before he departed midday for Qatar.
Assad didn't appear afterwards becasue he couldn't stop laughing!

Really: is Kofi the dumbest piece of crap in the world, deluding himself or an ally of the enemy!? I mean: doesn't Kofi know that Assad is a freaking tyrannical assassinator who is the principle arms conduit for Hizballah?! Maybe Assad paid off Kofi - lke Saddam did.

More HERE and HERE.

BLOGROLL US!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?