BBC CAN BE COUNTED ON TO DISTORT MORE THAN ENOUGH OF THE FACTS

Specifically, this is about the bulldozer attack yesterday. Honest Reporting's Backspin blog (Hat tip: Cosmic X) features some screenshot examples of how the Beeb lied about the bus, for example: they said it was an empty bus, when as it so happens, there were schoolgirls in it. In the third picture, they omitted the bus part altogether.

And there's little chance that we can ever expect them to improve. I won't be surprised if tons of people in Britain foolishly rely more on the MSM than they do in the US, and that's why they're able to get away with much of it.

BBC WROTE FAKED REPORT ON HOUSE OF HAMAS TERRORIST, FOX NEWS NOTICED

FOX News took note of Camera's report on how the BBC faked a report about the house of murderer of several students at Mercaz Harav, with the intention of getting people to sympathise with the devil. The house has yet to be demolished, but the Beeb claimed it had been, when in fact, it had not, though it most certainly should be torn down soon.

Now that's something to give FOX credit for.

BRITISH SPY CHIEF CALLS OUT BBC FOR SHOVING AQ PROPAGANDA DOWN KIDS' THROATS, BLAMING US FOR 9/11

This is presumably part of the Britain's campaign to make sure that every single child is exposed to virulent anti-Western Islamist propaganda. They already get a little under a quarter of them in the mosques. Fifty percent of those mosques are already under quasi-Taliban control, which helps explain why they're supporting AQ leaders and putting out pamphlets encouraging their followers to prepare for jihad. And the kids who they can't get there, they get with TV shows:

Britain's former spy chief accused the BBC of "parroting" Al Qaeda propaganda to children as young as six. Dame Pauline Neville Jones, who is also a former BBC governor, is infuriated at the stance the corporation's Newsround programme took on the September 11 attacks. She accused the flagship children's news bulletin of feeding an "ugly undercurrent" which suggests the terrorist outrage was somehow justifiable. Newsround is aimed at viewers aged between six and 12. On its website it answered the question concerning 9/11, "Why did they do it" by saying: "The way America has got involved in conflicts in regions like the Middle East has made some people very angry, including a group called al Qaeda - who are widely thought to have been behind the attacks."

What do you expect? That's what the European left thinks. They rarely if ever deign to talk to anyone who disagrees with them (why would they bother, since their superior sophistication has given them unique insight?) So you can see how they wouldn't know that you're still not supposed to say things like that in polite company. Academia, yes. Polite company, no.

Also, quick reminder: the BBC lies.

[Cross-posted to Mere Rhetoric]