"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Saturday, March 11, 2006

MORE FRENCH COWARDICE, HYPOCRISY AND DHIMMITUDE

FRENCH POLICE - WHO WATCHED AS MUSLIMS RIOTED DURING A NATIONWIDE, THREE WEEK LONG INTIFADA, (DURING WHICH MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF EUROS-WORTH OF DAMAGE WAS DONE TO BUILDINGS, CHURCHES, AND THOUSANDS OF CARS WERE TORCHED) - USED FORCE TO QUELL STUDENT REVOLT. BBC:
The French education minister has defended the use of force to evacuate almost 200 protesting students from the Sorbonne university in Paris. Gilles de Robien accused some of the students of "odious acts", including defacing books and equipment. Riot police using tear gas and batons confronted students angry at a new labour law, that would allow employers to hire and fire young workers.
I guess the French are obviously more afraid of their banlieue Muslims than of their pseudo-intellectual Parisian students. This strikes me as similar to the cowardice they displayed during the Cartoon Intifada - typified by the fact that almost daily, the French newspapers are "brave" enough to run horrifying ant-Bush cartoons, but none - execept for one - would even reprint the M'hummed cartoons.

No matter which way you slice it, it all smacks of cowardice, appeasement and dhimmitude.

RESPECT MUST BE EARNED

GATES OF VIENNA:
I have certainly learned to fear Islam. Islamophobia is definitely a rational response to world events right now — just ask those Christian schoolgirls in Indonesia. Oh, wait; you can’t ask them: they don’t have heads anymore.

I have learned to be circumspect about Islam, to tread lightly around its outer edges. I have learned to be alert concerning it, and observe it carefully in all its different manifestations.

But I have no respect for Islam, and no amount of violence, extortion, and bullying threats will cause me to respect it.
THERE'S MORE, INCLUDING EXAMPLES AND A CHALLENGE TO ISLAMOPHILES. GO THERE. RTWT.

A FENCE ALONG OUR INTERNATIONAL BORDERS WOULD BE A COST EFFECTIVE SECURITY ENHANCEMENT

VIA POLIPUNDIT:
Excerpt from the article on immigration:
In December, the House voted to build 700 miles of fencing in all four states that border Mexico, a proposal that even conservative Senate Republicans oppose on the grounds that it would be too expensive.
POLIPUNDIT: "The 700-mile-long fence will cost at most $5 billion. And that’s accounting for government math. The annual US budget is well in excess of $2 trillion. Assuming the fence will take, say, 3 years to build, it works out to less than 0.08 percent of the national budget during that time. Meanwhile, Congress increased spending by 8 percent last year alone!! ... And it’s not like such a fence hasn’t been built before. Israel, a tiny nation of 6 million people, managed to find the money to build a 600-mile long fence for $2 billion."
THE COSTS OF NOT BUILDING A FENCE ARE HIGHER THAN BUILDING ONE. PLUS, BUILDING ONE SENDS A POWERFUL MESSAGE: "DON'T TREAD ON ME!"

AS POLI' WRITES: Please call your senators and tell them to stop the invasion of America.

THE "SHRINKING ARCTIC ICE CAP" IS GOOD NEWS

DER SPIEGEL:
Global warming isn't necessarily the catastrophe it's made out to be. ... Shrinking ice caps would reveal the Arctic's massive energy sources and shorten tanker routes by thousands of miles.
PRAVDA:
The amount of mineral resources concentrated in the Arctic zone is huge. For example, 91% of natural gas production and 80% of Russia's explored reserves of industrial-grade natural gas are amassed in that region. It also contains 90% of all Russian extractable offshore reserves of hydrocarbons.

The hydrocarbon deposits in a deep-water area of the Arctic Ocean are estimated in 15-20 billion tons. The Arctic also has deposits of nickel, copper, wolfram, gold, silver, manganese, chromium, and titanium.
It would also reveal new areas for agriculture and aquaculture, and provide places for people to work and live. Maybe this will be the beginning of a great new era of pioneering? Maybe GREENLAND, will become green again, and maybe new, year-round settlements in the Great GREEN North will spring up, beginning a new era of growth and improving living standards for millions of people - everywhere?

Oh... er um... but what about those 4000 Polar bears? Hmmm... I say: Let them move in with the tree-huggers and the spotted owls. Seriously. I think the sky-is-falling global-warming crowd should CHILL OUT: (1) Global warming IS DEFINITELY NOT man-made - (so there's NOTHING we can do about it, not here and not on Mars!); and (2) it may very well have BENFICIAL consequences.

DEM GOV OF ILLINOIS PANDERS TO ILLEGAL MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS

VIA NRO'S THE CORNER:
"USTEDES NO SON CRIMINALES." [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
So the governor of Illinois today assured illegal immigrants gathered in Chicago.
More from the SUN-TIMES:
The rally came as the U.S. Senate struggles with a bill to stiffen border enforcement and a new report estimates the illegal immigrant population has grown from about 8.4 million in 2000 to nearly 12 million. ... From a platform, Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich addressed the massive crowd in Spanish, telling them that he is the son of immigrant parents and understands the issues that are important to them.

His proclamation that "Ustedes no son criminales. Ustedes son trabajadores" (You are not criminals. You are workers) elicited loud cheers.
HOW DO YOU SAY DHIMMITUDE IN SPANISH!? Really. Does CITIZENSHIP mean NOTHING to these guys!? Dees playing by the rules mean NOTHING to them!? Sheesh. And since the law that they were protesting in Chicago DOESN'T TARGET ANY ETHNIC GROUP, OR LIMIT ITSELF TO THE MEXICAN BORDER, why in the heck were there so many MEXICAN-AMERICAN (presumably) protesters, and why was the governor speaking in SPANISH?! ARE THEY PRESUMING THAT ALL ILLEGALS ARE MEXICAN? Or Hispanic?!

Let's build a fence the legnth of put entire border - with Canada AND Mexico. And then, let's expand LEGAL immigration. That's the only way for us to be safe and secure, and to make sure immigrants don't freeload off taxed based systems - like schools, don't over-burden our hospitals' emergency rooms., and don't drive around illegally an without insurance. And we can get tougher on employers who exploit them, too.

Friday, March 10, 2006

DEMOCRATS: THE PARTY OF PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS

WILLISMS: "Union membership in the private sector in this country is WAY down over the past few decades, while simultaneously WAY up in the public sector (via The Club For Growth blog)..."

Willism has a GREAT CHART; here's a summary:

In 1948, 35% of all private sector workers were in unions. It has declined ever since.
In 1948, 12% of all public sector workers were in unions. It has increased ever since.
In 2004, only 8% of all private sector workers are in unions.
In 2004, 37% of all public sector workers are in union.

Historically, the largest single segment of the Democrat Party has always been unions. It still is, but NOT the old "blue collar" unions of the private sector. The unions of the public sector are running the Democrat Party now. FACT: SINCE 1990, public sector unions have given 90% of their donations to the Democrat Party -- $135 MILLION DOLLARS to the Dems and only $12 million to the GOP.

WHY DO THESE UNIONS FAVOR THE DEMOCRAT PARTY? AND, WHAT CAN THE DEMOCRAT PARTY POSSIBLY DO FOR THEM THAT THE GOP WON'T?

Simple: the Democrats will raise taxes and increase the size of government and EXPAND THE SIZE, POWER AND WEALTH OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS. That's why the public sector unions love the Dems. It's a quid pro quo.

SO, if you want to have government for the public sector unions, by the public sector unions, and of the public sector unioins, then by all means... PLEASE VOTE DEMOCRAT.

WHY AMERICA IS THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD

INDISPUTABLE PROOF.

GERMANY: KORAN BEING PROSECUTED AS HATE SPEECH ANTI-THETICAL TO GERMAN CONSTITUTION

Yesterday I asked a few questions:
1 - FACT: Germany prosecuted Scientology as a cult. FACT: Scientology may seem weird, but they have no "radical wing", nor has any Scientologist perpetrated any hate crime as one millionth as bad as what radical Muslims do in the name of Islam nearly everyday, some where in the world.

QUESTION: So, why don't the Germans prosecute radical Muslims as dangerous cult-members and ban radical Islam as a dangerous cult?

I think the answer might be that the Germans - and the other Euroweenies who appease radical Islam - are hypocritical idiots whose denial of reality actually endangers themselves: They prosecute Scientology precisely because it is LESS threatening than radical Islam.

2 - FACT: The EU has strict laws about hate speech and slander and liable. FACT: Italy is prosecuting Oriana Fallaci over some things she wrote about the "ROP." FACT: What she wrote is less hateful and has inspired less hate and fewer crimes than the stuff in the Koran which the radical Muslims quote and which inspires them to commit genocidal terror; even Irshad Manji admits that these radical Muslim terrorists are LITERALISTS - meaning they are literally correct in citing the Koran as their inspiration because the Koran LITERLALY calls on them to act as they act, and do as they do.

QUESTION: So, why don't the EUropeans ban the Koran as a hate-book - the way Germany has banned Mein Kampf?
Today, IT SEEMS SOMEONE ELSE HAD THE SAME THOUGHTS AND THEY'RE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT! VIA DISSECTING LEFTISM:
Koran under legal attack in Germany: "At the prosecutor's office at Gorch-Forck-Wall 15 in Hamburg, an unusual letter was received Monday morning, containing an indictment filed this weekend. The indictment targeted the Quran, charging that the holy book of the Moslems, according to the accuser, is incompatible with the German constitution. The accuser is "Bundesverband der B_rgerbewegungen (BVB)", which concerns itself with, in its own words, "defending basic rights and freedoms" against Islam....

The indictment has been filed in several states, including Hamburg, Niedersachsen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Bayern and probably more. In several talkshows on German TV, conservative politicians have pointed out that the Quran is incompatible with the German constitution. The Turkish-born writer Serap Cileli said on January 29 this year that "the Quran must be considered a historic document. It is not compatible with our constitution and Human Rights." Now the alliance wants the matter tried at the courts....

The indictment is against the 200 verses of 114 suras (ED:chapters) of the Quran that are not compatible with the constitution, including demagoguery, incitement to murder, murder and mutilation, war, acceptance of thievery against infidels, meaning all non-Moslems. Verses are also pointed out where th
e equal rights of men and women are not upheld and where people of different faiths are oppressed."

I get results! Stay tuned. IF the German courts have any integrity and consistency thyen they will ban the Koran!

UPDATE: More HERE from ECONOPUNDIT.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

ANOTHER SANE VOICE FROM NEW EUROPE WARNS OLD EUROPE ABOUT THE EU

The Czech President said that he has serious “doubts about the EU’s ever-closer future.” It is striking to see that he shares these doubts with other former East European dissidents, such as Vladimir Bukovsky, who was in Brussels last month to warn against the transformation of the EU into a new Soviet Union, an “EUSSR.”

Mr Klaus explained to his Luxemburg audience:
The reason why my way of looking at the European integration process is somewhat different is probably connected with my (and our) historic memory, with my (and our) specific experience, especially with experience of the Communist era. This determines my attitude to many issues. ...We should make our society free, democratic and prosperous. It will not be achieved by democratic deficit, by supranationalism, by etatism, by an increase in legislating, monitoring, and regulating.
MORE ON THIS TOPIC HERE: Former Soviet Dissident Warns for EU Dictatorship, 27 February 2006
He's right. And Rasmussen and Sarkozy and Merkel are listening. But can they save Europe? I dunno - demographics seem to suggest that it might be too late...

MUSLIMS BOMB HINDU TEMPLE IN INDONESIA

AP:
POSO, INDONESIA - A small bomb exploded Friday outside a Hindu temple on an Indonesian island that has been plagued by religious violence, wounding a man who was guarding the compound, police said. Hundreds of onlookers gathered around the temple after the blast, which seriously wounded the guard.

Some 3,000 security personnel have been deployed to safeguard Poso, a city 1,000 miles northeast of Jakarta, since last year following a spate of attacks targeting Christians. Though Indonesia is predominantly Muslim, a large percentage of Poso's population is Christian and a small minority is Hindu. There were fierce battles between members of the two faiths in 2001 and 2002 that killed about 1,000 people.
FLASHBACK (2005):
A Christian man has been killed by decapitation in the latest attack against non-Muslims in the sectarian violence-hit eastern Indonesian town of Poso, police said on Friday. ...Poso has seen intermittent communal violence between Muslims and Christians since 2000 despite a government-brokered peace accord agreed two years ago.

Thursday's incidents followed the unsolved shooting of a man in the grounds of a church in Poso last month. ...

Also last month, a Hindu woman was killed and two Christian men wounded when a group fired randomly into houses in the region on the same day that two Christians were hacked to death near the provincial capital Palu.
All this violence is Muslim versus non-Muslim. Do you think this has ANYTHING to do with Iraq or Israel or Halliburton!? You know what I think? I think that if-and-when Indonesia's Christians and Hindu's start fighting the Left'll still be blaming BusHitler and the Jews - I mean neo-cons!

A little more HERE. (BTW: as the flashback excerpt noted, Poso has had radical Muslim violence since 2000 - that's BEFORE 9/11 - even BEFORE Bush was elected!)

WHO'S BEATING THE DRUM AGAINST THE MUSLIMS?

POWERLINE:
...the Washington Post reports on its poll showing that a growing number of Americans express disapproval of Islam, and a majority now say there are more violent extremists among Muslims than other religions. The Post could have attributed these findings to the fact that lots of people follow the news. Instead, being the Post, it quotes far-left professor Juan Cole:
Americans have been given the message to respond this way by the American political elite, mass media and by select special interests.
Those "select special interests" would be Jews, I suppose. The Post also provides some unintentional humor by quoting Professor Ronald Stockton:
You're getting a constant drumbeat of negative information about Islam.
That's true. The drumbeat consists of news stories about bombings, violent demonstrations, demands that others conform to their religious practices, threats to obliterate other countries, beheadings, and so on. That's "negative information," all right.
YUP: there's a drumbeat all right - and the folks beating the drums are the radical Muslims. Though the Dems and the Left are...BLAMING BUSH! So what else is new!?! And how WRONG. One of the most irksome things about Bush is that he's ALWAYS saying, "Islam is a RELIGION OF PEACE." Oh well. I guess that just proves some people will never change.

WELL. AS THAT FAMOUS BANDLEADER HARRY S TRUMAN ONCE SAID:

"IF YOU CAN'T STAND THE BEAT, GET OUT OF THE CONGA LINE!"

CLOONEY AND HOLLYWOOD: OUT OF TOUCH WITH HISTORY AND THE TRUTH

Noonan made many good points in her column about Clooney and Hollywood today, "Boy in a Bubble." Here's a key point - and where she went a little wrong - IMHO:
The Clooney generation in Hollywood is not writing and directing movies about life as if they've experienced it, with all its mysteries and complexity and variety. In an odd way they haven't experienced life; they've experienced media. Their films seem more an elaboration and meditation on media than an elaboration and meditation on life. This is how he could take such an unnuanced, unsophisticated, unknowing gloss on the 1950s and the McCarthy era. He just absorbed media about it. And that media itself came from certain assumptions and understandings, and myths.

Most Americans aren't leading media, they're leading lives. It would be nice to see a new respect in Hollywood for the lives they live.
YES: most of us lead REAL lives; most of us are not living in a Hollywood millionaire's bubble. BUT: I think that many MANY Americans are under-educated - ESPECIALLY about history. And I think that this makes them ESPECIALLY susceptible to Left-wing BS, and very PRONE to being swept up into facile explanatory templates - the type of thing that the Left seems to specialize in:
Bush knew about 9/11; Bush lied about WMD; Saddam and Bin Laden are products of American hegemony coming back to bite us; global-warming is man-made - and it's especially the fault of us over-consuming Americans - our greed and gluttony and selfishness; Big Oil is evil; and the overt reasons people do things are never the REAL reasons - to discover the REAL reasons you must see the conspiracies beneath the surface; and Israelis and Arabs are equally to blame for the violence in the Middle East. And so on...
I think that whether or not people lead REAL lives, or live in a bubble has NOTHING to do with whether they are suceptible to these LIES. I think EDUCATION - or lack thereof- does.

If MORE Americans knew history better then they wouldn't be at all suceptible to the propaganda people like Clooney churn out.

If they knew that McCarthy was finished BEFORE Murrow said "boo!", and if they knew that the CIA agent Bob Baer - who wrote the book which Syriana was based on - was a hawk who wanted us to get TOUGHER on Hizballah (IOW: THE OPPOSITE OF HOW CLOONEY CHOSE TO PORTRAY HIM!), and if they knew that Saddam was a client of the USSR, and if they knew that the MOSSAD assassinated the terrorists who murdered the Jewish Olympic atheletes they made future attacks less likely because (at the veryt least) these perps would NEVER attack again, and if they knew that and so much else... THEN THE SUPERFICIAL LEFTWING PROPAGANDA WHICH POSES AS ENTERTAINMENT WOULD DISAPPEAR ENTIRELY.

And guys like Clooney would stick to re-making movies about casino heists and sinking fishing boats, and guys like Moore would be out-of-business.

And Hollywood Box Office receipts would probably GO UP! HEY: It's a win-win!

MORE HERE.

IF WE REALLY WANT TO IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT IN A WAY WHICH WILL IMPROVE THE HUMAN CONDITION, THEN WE SHOULD FOCUS ON WATER AND NOT GREENHOUSE GASES

MORE PROOF THAT KYOTO IS BS: BBC:
Almost 20% of the world's population still lacks access to safe drinking water because of failed policies, an influential report has concluded. ... One billion people without access to clean drinking water ... 2.6 billion without adequate sanitation
More on sensible environmental priorities HERE and also HERE. More on how KYOTO and "green credits/taxes" and trading carbon/CO2 is a huge scam HERE.

And HERE, a scientist thoroughly DEBUNKS man-made global-warming
; EXCERPT:
... scientific evidence clearly indicates the global warming in the last 100 years is likely not due mostly to human activities. The first thing to note is that the 100 years of global warming occurred in two stages -- a temperature rise of approximately a half-degree Fahrenheit early in the century from 1910 to 1940, and another half-degree temperature rise toward the end of the century in the 1980s and 1990s.

Between these two periods of warming, from the 1940s to the 1970s, the earth actually cooled somewhat. Greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide cannot cool the planet; they can only warm it. ...

Scientific facts indicate that all the temperature changes observed in the last 100 years were largely natural changes and were not caused by carbon dioxide produced in human activities. At least one distinguished member of the NAS panel agrees. Richard Lindzen, professor of meteorology at MIT, highly respected atmospheric physicist, and member of the National Academy of Sciences as well as the special NAS panel on global warming, said in a recent commentary, "
I cannot stress this enough -- we [cannot] confidently attribute past climate change to carbon dioxide."
Using socialistic and draconian measures - (which unscrupulous traders exploit to reap personal profits even as they raise OUR cost of energy) - to limit the growth of greenhouse gases (which are in fact UNRELEATED to global-warming) is JUST PLAIN STUPID.

Let's raise and spend enough money to improve water treatment and water distribution in the Third World, instead of wasting time and money on Kyoto. We can more quickly improve the lives of more people, if we do.

ACLU HYPOCRISY ON THE USE OF DEADLY INJECTIONS

JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HYPOCRISY IN THE SERVICE OF THE LEFTIST AGENDA:
"Injecting a crtically ill person with deadly chemicals in the cause of euthaniasia is another cause the ACLU champion. But to lethally inject a heinous criminal? Well, of course that violates the First Amendment."
- STOP THE ACLU. RTWT.

BTW: I have previously recommended that prisons just withhold food and water to execute prisoners, after all - as we learned in the Schiavo case - dying from dehydration and starvation is a peaceful humane way to die.

DEFEATING RADICAL ISLAM REQUIRES DEFEATING THE LEFT

1 - FACT: Germany prosecuted Scientology as a cult. FACT: Scientology may seem weird, but they have no "radical wing", nor has any Scientologist perpetrated any hate crime as one millionth as bad as what radical Muslims do in the name of Islam nearly everyday, some where in the world.

QUESTION:
So, why don't the Germans prosecute radical Muslims as dangerous cult-members and ban radical Islam as a dangerous cult?
I think the answer might be that the Germans - and the other Euroweenies who appease radical Islam - are hypocritical idiots whose denial of reality actually endangers themselves: They prosecute Scientology precisely because it is LESS threatening than radical Islam.
2 - FACT: The EU has strict laws about hate speech and slander and liable. FACT: Italy is prosecuting Oriana Fallaci over some things she wrote about the "ROP." FACT: What she wrote is less hateful and has inspired less hate and fewer crimes than the stuff in the Koran which the radical Muslims quote and which inspires them to commit genocidal terror; even Irshad Manji admits that these radical Muslim terrorists are LITERALISTS - meaning they are literally correct in citing the Koran as their inspiration because the Koran LITERLALY calls on them to act as they act, and do as they do.

QUESTION:
So, why don't the EUropeans ban the Koran as a hate-book - the way Germany has banned Mein Kampf?
I think the answer is the same: the EUroweenies know they can get away with prosecuting the Fallaci's (who are merely warning us about the enemy's desire to destroy us and our civilization).

The EUroweenies would rather appease the enemy then defend the West because theyb are post-modern Leftist who have been indoctrinated to hate the West: they blame Thrid World poverty on colonialism and imperialism, and they consoder the Long War to be "blowback." They are atheistic socialists who despise Christianity as much as the radical Muslims - though for their own reasons. Thgis ideological bent of the EUroleft makes themincapable of mounting a strong defense of Europe.

The EUroweenies are even too cowardly to prosecute imams who actually promote genocide. If the EU were truly serious about SURVIVING, then these imams would be deported and their mosques would be shut down - AT ONCE. BUT THEY ARE NOT. WHY!?
LOOKIT: Nearly every setback we've suffered in The Long War is the result of the unwillingness of the post-modernist Left and the doves and the appeasers to alow us to do what must be done. Their interference won't make the ultimate conflict less likely or severe; in fact - because it enables the enemy to continue to plan, infiltrate and execute operations which undermine our defenses - it will only make the ultimate confrontation FAR WORSE.

The Left fears Bush and the NSA more than Zarqawi and al Qaeda. The appeasers want to finance Hamas, and let Iran get nukes. The ACLU wants to stop randon bag searches in NYC subways, and profiling in airports. And so on, and so forth.

That's why I firmly believe that to defeat the radical Muslims is ESSENTIAL that we also defeat the Left. Right now, we beating the radical Muslims but we are losing to the Left.

And if either House of the US Congress is won by the Left (which now seems POSSIBLE), then the Long War will go the way of Vietnam: The Left will transform a military victory into a surrender. LET ME REMIND YOU: The Vietnam Capitulation - in 1975, (two years after the last US combat troops left Vietnam) - cost the world 5 million SE Asian lives; another 70 million more were condemned to live under Marxist tyranny for 40 years!

As horrible as that sounds, the price of surrender in The Long War will much MUCH worse: Europe will become as western as Turkey; a nuclear Iran will spread radical Islam throughout the Middle East and South Asia; radical Muslims will GENOCIDALLY SLAUGHTER non-radical Muslims, and non-Muslims who refuse to become dhimmis; and 550 million Muslim women will be condemned to burkas, servitude, forced marriage, and honor-killings.

We must make our stand now. IT'S NOW OR NEVER.

GLOBAL BIRD FLU WORRIES INCREASE

STORY HERE and ROUND-UP HERE.

EURABIA RISING: THE LEFTIST-MUSLIM IMMIGRANT ELECTORAL COALITION STRENGTHENS

IS SHARIA COMING TO WESTERN EUROPE? BRUSSELS JOURNAL:
Yesterday’s municipal elections in the Netherlands were won by the Left ... the far-left Socialist Party (SP) doubled its number of seats. ... Yesterday’s result does not bode well for the Right in next year’s general elections. ... A government of Labour, the SP and the extreme-left Groen Links (Green Left) Party could replace the current center-right government ... Today the center-left newspaper De Volkskrant writes that the immigrant vote has tipped the balance in favour of the Left.

Today, owing to their demographic growth, the immigrant vote is increasing as more and more young immigrants reach voting age. In many countries the Left has begun to cater for the immigrants, aware that the immigrants guarantee their power.

According to the Institute for Migration and Ethnic Studies of the University of Amsterdam 80% of the non-indigenous electorate voted for Labour. This explains why cities such as Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Breda and Arnhem succumbed to the Left. The center-right ... party of famous Dutch policians such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali ... received only 1% of the immigrant vote. ...

This should not come as a surprise. All across Europe, immigrants tend to vote for the Left. The Left is perceived to be the welfare state’s Santa Claus. Most of the immigrants who came to Europe during the past decades were attracted by the generous welfare benefits which Western Europe lavishly bestows on the “underprivileged.”
As HAMAS took over the territories, so too will Muslim immigrants take over Old Europe. Unless something really DRASTIC happens before 2007 (like Leftists wake up and realize the risk to their civilization, or Sarkozy and Merkel really turn things around), NOTHING can stop the Muslims from taking over Western Europe: The Muslims have demographics, a stealth strategy, and willing COLLABORATORS on the Left.

THINK I'M BEING AND ALARMIST? Wish I was. NOTE: In France's larger cities, 50% of the men under age 20 ARE MUSLIM. More HERE and HERE and HERE.

ABBAS ENDORSES OLMERT

MANORAMA:
In an interview in the Italian daily Corriere della Sera, Abbas was asked about the March 28 election. "I hope Olmert wins," Abbas was quoted as saying.
WITH ENEMIES LIKE THIS, WHO NEEDS OTHER ENEMIES!?

ARUTZ SHEVA: Kadima continues to slip in the polls. While maintaining the lead, the latest Ha’aretz-Dialogue poll places Kadima at 37 seats, down five or more seats from earlier polls. The Labor Party continues to hold onto second place with Likud following in third place.

UPDATE: Xinhuanet (China): Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Wednesday night denied allegations that he expected Israeli acting prime minister Ehud Olmert to win in the upcoming general elections. Abbas office in Gaza said in an official statement that his comments may have been misinterpreted when asked a question regarding the predicted win of Olmert's centrist Kadima party. Abbas responded by saying:
"We respect the will of the Israeli people. If it will be that Mr. Olmert wins, I know him well and I believe that it is possible to work with him. Shimon Peres, number two in Kadima, is an old friend of mine. ..."
With denials like this who needs denials!?

FRANCE GETS FIRST NON-WHITE EVENING NEWSCASTER... er um... temporarily

THE SCOTSMAN:
France is appointing its first black newscaster to mainstream TV, following pressure from the president, Jacques Chirac. ... Harry Roselmack, 32, who was born on the French Caribbean island of Martinique, will become the first non-white to present the main, 8pm news on France's most watched TV channel, the independent station TF1. ... The announcement that a black man will read the French nightly news was greeted by politicians and the media with self-congratulatory enthusiasm.

There is a hitch, however. Roselmack is merely standing in for Patrick Poivre d'Arvor, while the popular newscaster takes his summer holidays.

Nevertheless, the appointment has made considerable waves in a country where high-profile journalists "of ethnic origin" can be counted on one hand. ... The move came after Mr Chirac called television bosses to the Elysée Palace last November after the country suffered three weeks of the most severe urban unrest in over 40 years as youths of mainly north African and Caribbean origin from the deprived suburbs went on the rampage to protest against widespread discrimination.


Mr Chirac is reported to have told the TV heads to create a more accurate representation on screen of France's minority population. France has the largest Muslim population in Europe, estimated at about five million, most of whom are of north African origin. With the rare exception of sporting figures and a handful of singers and comedians, the only time non-white faces appear on French TV is during news reports on unrest in suburban ghettos.
I betchya all the europhilic degenerati - those wine-sipping, cuisine-eating, hybrid-driving, private jet-setting Lefties never figured that France was this far behind the USA in race relations. What would Clooney say? "It's hard to be a pimp in Paris."

Kidding aside... this really helps prove that contrary to what the radical chic Lefties believe, America is a much MUCH better place than Europe in nearly every way.

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

THE AXIS OF EVIL: A FEW TROUBLING DEVELOPMENTS

Arirang News: Iran ‘Buying Missiles from North Korea’
Iran is reportedly stepping up development of long-range missiles. According to an intelligence report given to Reuters by a non-U.S. diplomat, Tehran is pursuing a program code-named Project 111, whose aim is to arm Iran's Shahab-3 missiles, which experts believe have a maximum range of 2,000 kilometers, with nuclear warheads. The Shahab is based on North Korea's Rodong missile technology.

Reuters also said a German diplomat, citing his country's intelligence data, confirmed that Iran had purchased from North Korea 18 disassembled BM-25 mobile missiles with a range of 2,500 km, which would render them capable of reaching Israel and Turkey from Iran. ... Reuters said Tehran sharply increased production of the Shahab-3 missiles from less than 20 to around 90 a year.
North Korea is set to deploy ballistic missiles that could reach Alaska and remains a global security threat despite its failing economy, the head of the U.S. military in South Korea told a Senate hearing on Tuesday. "Reports indicate North Korea is also preparing to field a new intermediate range ballistic missile which could easily reach United States facilities in Okinawa, Guam, and possibly Alaska," Gen. B.B. Bell, commander of the U.S. Forces Korea, told the Senate Armed Services Committee.
MosNews: Russian Ambassador Opposes US Sanctions Against Iran, North Korea
Russia opposes any kind of sanctions against what the United States calls rogue states such as Iran and North Korea, Russian ambassador to South Korea said on Tuesday. Gleb Ivashentsov quoted by The Korea Times after a forum hosted by the Korea News Editors’ Association in Seoul said Russia was against “any economic sanctions because they do not work.” “There should be dialogue, there should be consultation, but sanctions do not work neither against North Korea, nor against Iran, nor against any other country.”
Let's add up these three items: (1) North Korea and Iran are BOTH stepping up their production of longer range missiles; (2) North Korea is even selling them to Iran - even as Iran is developing a nuke weapons program; AND (3) BOTH Iran and North Korea are being enabled and EXPLICITLY protected by Russia, who is also selling anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran - and to Syria - as well as building sevaral nuke facilites for Iran. And meeting with Hamas.

Well, folks - I believe that Russia is playing a double game with us: They talk like they're our allies while they REALLY HELP OUR ENEMIES.

I hate to be the one to say this but
IT'S TIME TO GIVE RUSSIA FULL TIME STATUS IN THE AXIS OF EVIL. They should be booted OUT of the G8 - FOR STARTERS!

And, you know what else? The longer we wait to confront North Korea , Syria and Iran, the harder it will be. The old saying was "Faster, please!" The new saying should be, "IT'S NOW OR NEVER!"

Monday, March 06, 2006

HOLLYWOOD: THE DIS-INFOTAINMENT CAPITAL OF THE WORLD

Infotainment:
Infotainment, combining information with entertainment, is a fairly recent neologism for a television program, Web site feature, or other presentation that combines information with entertainment. Most of today's popular fact-based television shows, such as those on the Animal Planet channel, could be classed as infotainment.
Disinformation:
- erroneous material intentionally promoted to confuse, distract and otherwise make it more difficult to determine the truth. Some disinformation is amplified by well-meaning persons who unwittingly adopt the material without understanding that it is not genuine. ...
DISINFOTAINMENT: When the information in that presentation is false, distorted or twisted in order to advance a morally relativist, multiculturalist, anti-bourgeois, anti-traditonal, anti-West, anti-American or anti-free market agenda, then it should be called DISINFOTAINMENT, or... a Hollywood movie for short!

[ASIDE: SHOUT OUT TO DR. SANITY: Why not write lyrics for a song called "That's Disinfotainment!"?]

IRAN CAUGHT EXPORTING IED'S INTO IRAQ

ABC NEWS:
U.S. military and intelligence officials tell ABC News that they have caught shipments of deadly new bombs at the Iran-Iraq border. ... U.S. officials say roadside bomb attacks against American forces in Iraq have become much more deadly as more and more of the Iran-designed and Iran-produced bombs have been smuggled in from the country since last October.

"I think the evidence is strong that the Iranian government is making these IEDs, and the Iranian government is sending them across the border and they are killing U.S. troops once they get there," says Richard Clarke, former White House counterterrorism chief and an ABC News consultant. "I think it's very hard to escape the conclusion that, in all probability, the Iranian government is knowingly killing U.S. troops." ...

John Negroponte, director of national intelligence, testified before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on Februrary 2, saying, "Tehran's intention to inflict pain on the United States and Iraq has been constrained by its caution to avoid giving Washington an excuse to attack it."
Well, that EXCUSE is gonzo, baby: THIS IS AN ACT OF WAR! WE MUST COUNTER-ATTACK! [NOTE: Clarke is hardly a friend of this administration, and he concurs.] More HERE and HERE. AND HERE. And HERE, too.

UPDATE: TYPICALLY, I POSTED ON THIS LONG BEFORE MOST ANYBODY ELSE:
Sunday, August 07, 2005 - IRAN, IED'S AND BOLTON AND THE UNSC:

NYTIMES:
WASHINGTON, Aug. 5 - Many of the new, more sophisticated roadside bombs used to attack American and government forces in Iraq have been designed in Iran and shipped in from there, United States military and intelligence officials said Friday, raising the prospect of increased foreign help for Iraqi insurgents. ... "These are among the most sophisticated and most lethal devices we've seen," said the senior officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the delicate intelligence reports describing the bombs. "It's very serious."

... Pentagon and intelligence officials say that some shipments of the new explosives have contained both components and fully manufactured devices, and may have been spirited into Iraq along the porous Iranian border by the Iranian-backed, anti-Israeli terrorist group Hezbollah, or by Iran's Revolutionary Guard. American commanders say these bombs closely matched those that Hezbollah has used against Israel. ... American officials say they have no evidence that the Iranian government is involved. But Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and the new United States ambassador in Baghdad, Zalmay Khalilzad, complained publicly this week about the Tehran government's harmful meddling in Iraqi affairs.

If this it is true, then BOLTON should demand and emergency session of the UNSC and provide the world with evidence, and then demand that the Iranian government close it's border with Iraq or we they will be hit with UN sanctions, and a USA ultimatum: if there is another shipment of IED's into Iraq, then we will attack Iran militarily - destroying ALL their military assets.

On October 25th, 1962 JFK authorized Adlai Stevenson to present photographic evidence on the Russian nukes and to be VERY tough with the Soviets when we discovered the USSR missiles in Cuba. Bush should authorize Bolton to be just as forthcoming (and also to show proof of the claim) and just as tough: by issuing an the above ultimatum to Iran. Why have a rottweiler like Bolton if we don't use him!?
What was true then is more true now. And it is further proof that Bush has been WAY TOO PATIENT with Iran.

We should replace the phrase, "FASTER PLEASE!" with, "IT'S NOW OR NEVER!"

CLOONEY AND HOLLYWOOD "PROUD TO BE OUT OF TOUCH" WITH THE TRUTH

George Clooney accepting his actor in a supporting role Oscar® for ‘Syriana’:
“Wow. All right, so I'm not a winning director… I would say that, you know, we are a little bit out of touch in Hollywood every once in a while. I think it's probably a good thing. We're the ones who talked about AIDS when it was just being whispered, and we talked about civil rights when it wasn't really popular. And we, you know, we bring up subjects. This Academy, this group of people gave Hattie McDaniel an Oscar in 1939 when blacks were still sitting in the backs of theaters. I'm proud to be a part of this Academy, proud to be part of this community, and proud to be out of touch.”
[More on CLOONEY here and HERE.]

POWERLINE:
The movie for which Clooney received an award, Syrianna, isn't out of touch with America because it is morally superior; it is out of touch because it is mind-numbingly dumb. A film that takes the position that suicide bombers are good, America is controlled by corrupt oilmen, and the United States is the force that stands in the way of Middle Eastern democracy, isn't just out of touch with America. It's out of touch with reality. Which probably explains, at least in part, why it was a dud.
KRAUTHAMMER:
The most pernicious element in the movie is the character who is at the moral heart of the film: the physically beautiful, modest, caring, generous Pakistani who becomes a beautiful, modest, caring, generous ... suicide bomber. In his final act, the Pure One, dressed in the purest white robes, takes his explosives-laden little motorboat head first into his target. It is a replay of the real-life boat that plunged into the USS Cole in 2000, killing 17 American sailors, except that in ``Syriana's'' version, the target is another symbol of American imperialism in the Persian Gulf -- a newly opened liquefied natural gas terminal....

I used to think that Hollywood had achieved its nadir with Oliver Stone's ``JFK,'' a film that taught a generation of Americans that President Kennedy was assassinated by the CIA and the FBI in collaboration with Lyndon Johnson. But at least it was for domestic consumption, an internal affair of only marginal interest to other countries. ``Syriana,'' however, is meant for export, carrying the most vicious and pernicious mendacities about America to a receptive world.

Most liberalism is angst- and guilt-ridden, seeing moral equivalence everywhere. ``Syriana'' is of a different species entirely -- a pathological variety that burns with the certainty of its malign anti-Americanism. Osama bin Laden could not have scripted this film with more conviction.
RELIAPUNDIT: (1) Clooney LIED when he made Murrow central to McCarthy's downfall. He obscurred the truth that Murrow was an anti-communist too - but one who didn't like McCarthy's tactics or style. (2) Clooney's LIED when he made the CIA agent he played in Syriana come under FBI investigation for being pro-Arab; in fact, Baer - the author of the book on which Syriana was ostensibly based, and the person Clooney's character was based on - was a hawk who wanted the USA to get tougher on the jihadoterrorists of Hizballah, not an appeasing dove.

These DELIBERATE LIES AND DISTORTIONS denigrate the USA and elevate the Left; they alter reality and serve the enemies of America.

That Clooney and Hollywood don't see it that way only proves how out of touch they are - NOT out of touch with the ignorant cretins of middle-America, but out of touch with reality, out of touch with any committment to tell the truth.

HEY CLOONEY: If reality and truth are antithetical to your politics, maybe you should change your politics, instead of LYING!? HEY CLOONEY: If you can't win an argument unless you lie, then maybe you're arguing the WRONG side of the controversy?!

UPDATE:
The idea that it is brave to stand up for gays in Hollywood, to stand up against Joe McCarthy in Hollywood (fifty years after his death), to say that rich white people are bad, that oil companies are evil -- this is nonsense.

All of these are mainstream ideas in Hollywood, always have been, always will be. For the people who made movies denouncing Big Oil, worshiping gays, mocking the rich to think of themselves as brave -- this is pathetic, childish narcissism. ...


Hollywood is above all about self: self-congratulation, self-promotion, and above all, self-protection. This is human and basic, but let's not kid ourselves. There is no greatness there in the Kodak theater. The greatness is on patrol in Kirkuk. The greatness lies unable to sleep worrying about her man in Mosul. The greatness sleeps at Arlington National Cemetery and lies waiting for death in VA Hospitals. God help us that we have sunk so low as to confuse foolish and petty boasting with the real courage that keeps this nation and the many fools in it alive and flourishing on national TV.
That's PURE GENIUS from Ben Stein. (Via DPGI)

Sunday, March 05, 2006

CONTEXTUALIZING MUSLIM SECTARIAN VIOLENCE IN IRAQ

I think we should be aware of the CONTEXT of the recent outbreak of violence in Iraq: There has always been sectarian violence within Islam:
There has been Sunni versus Shia, all violence all over the world - in Pakistan, for instance; and there have also been persitient attacks against Sufis by Sunnis and Shias. Most importantly, there were 25 years of persistent Sunni violence against Shias in Iraq: Saddam committed genocide against the Shias who were un-armed then. Now, the difference is that the Shias are also armed (with guns and a major roles in SELF-RULE), and they are fighting back.
This violent sectarian strife - ALWAYS in the backround throughout the enitre Muslim world - was deliberately exacerbated in Iraq by the recent attack on the Shia mosque in Sammarra. But because the Shia led central government and Sistani - and even al Sadr - realize that an all-out sectarian war doesn't serve their goals, (but only the goals of the transnational jihadoterrorists), the Shias have restrained themselves. This means that a sectarian civil war in Iraq is highly unlikely. (The US military agrees.)

LOOK AT IT THIS WAY: The transnational jihadoterrorists hate - and would commit genocide against - ALL non-Muslims and ALL "non-radical Muslims" - favoring ONLY the Wahhabist/Salafist/Qutubists strain of Islam. Because the political and religious leaders of Iraq's two largest groups - the Kurds and the Shias - realize that this recent uptick in sectarian violence is merely the result of the incitement by the transnational jihadoterrorists, they will actively take actions to prevent a sectarian civil war from breaking out. The attack in Sammarra has therefore actually had the effect of STRENGTHENING federalism in Iraq. SO: Al Qaeda has failed again. They must be getting very frustrated and desperate; they must be asking themselves, "If blowing up one of the holiest Shia mosques doesn't create widespread violent chaos, then what can?"

Which means, I expect, they will try even more horrendous attacks in the days ahead. If not in Iraq, then in Jordan, Lebanon, Europe or Israel; (they might attempt to blow up the al Aksa mosque and blame it on Jews). Zawahiri's recent message reinforces this view. The enemy - more desperate than ever - is going to attempt something REALLY big. Stay tuned...