"ALL CAPS IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY IS NO VICE."

Showing posts with label Petraeus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Petraeus. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

A LOOK AT WHO IS QUESTIONING PETRAEUS



















YEAH: CORRUPT SCUM.
DON'T LIKE IT?
TOUGH: FACTS IS FACTS.
(JUST USE THE LINKS, AND THE LINKS WITHIN THE LINKS!)

THESE THREE CORRUPT TRAITORS HAVE NO BUSINESS BEING IN THE SAME ROOM AS PETRAEUS, LET ALONE QUESTION HIM.

AND YES, THEY ARE TRAITORS:
  • THEY UNDERMINE HIS LEADERSHIP - BY QUESTIONING HIS VERACITY;
  • THEY UNDERMINE OUR TROOPS MORALE - BY SAYING WE ARE LOSING AND CANNOT WIN;
  • AND THIS GIVES SUCCOR TO THE ENEMY.
THIS MAKES THEM TRAITOROUS CORRUPT SCUM.

(I'm not giving them hell; I'm just telling the TRUTH ; they just think it's HELL.
AND YES: I OFTEN DO IT IN CAPS. Get used to it.)

UPDATE: More on Obama's and Hillary's CORRUPTION PROBLEMS here - from TONIGHT'S NYTIMES!

Monday, September 10, 2007

IRAN WANTS TO TURN IRAQ INTO LEBANON

WOULD THAT BE LEBANONIZE? HOW 'BOUT...HIZBALLIFY Never mind....

Seriously, I think this was one of the most interesting points Petraeus made. HOT AIR:
Update: Petraeus cites the capture of Hezbollah bombmaker Ali Mussa Daqduq as evidence that Iran is trying to build a parallel organization in Iraq to challenge the seat.

That ignites the first protest in the back of the room, which is indecipherable but doubtless has to do with neocons gunning for war with Tehran.

The Independent wrote the seminal article about Sadrist/Hezbollah collusion last month. Read it now if you missed it before.

Money quote:

Speaking in Tufa in Iraq, Muqtada al-Sadr, the head of the Mehdi Army, admitted to “formal links” with Hizbollah.

“We have formal links with Hizbollah, we do exchange ideas and discuss the situation facing Shiites in both countries,” he said. “It is natural that we would want to improve ourselves by learning from each other. We copy Hizbollah in the way they fight and their tactics, we teach each other and we are getting better through this.”

Mr Sadr said members of the Mehdi Army had travelled to Lebanon, and would continue to do so.
When Petraeus says that "Iran is trying to build a parallel organization in Iraq to challenge the seat" he means that they are trying to turn Iraq into Lebanon: a diverse nation with an armed sectarian militia which operates as a law unto itself and challenges the real government as it militates for jihadism and sharia.

WE MUSTN'T ALLOW THIS.

PREMATURE WITHDRAWAL WOULD FACILITATE IT.

THE DEMS STATED POLICY OF EXPEDITED WITHDRAWAL BY A TIMETABLE WOULD ONLY HELP IRAN AND SADR AND AL QAEDA.

IS THAT IN OUR INTEREST!?

Any and all Muslim nations which want to have democracy and not sharia ought to be aiding us.

Now is the time to stand up to the jihadists EVERYWHERE - as Lebanon has just recently.
If Lebanon can defeat al Qaeda in Tripoli, then we can in Iraq.

We must.

THE DEMOCRATS' ANTI-PETRAEUS EFFORT WILL LEAD TO A BACKLASH


In an earlier post, I asserted that since the US electorate holds the military in higher esteem than the Congress, that any effort to smear Petraeus and pre-judge his efforts and the report on his efforts would hurt the Dems.


The NYTIMES today published results of a poll which proof the foundation of my argument; (see graph on the left).


If the Dems don't relent - and give Petraeus at least the same trust as the public, they will suffer.

The Dem's leftist base - which seems to be calling the shots, folks like those at MOVEON, and MOORE and SHEEHAN AND KOS - hate the military, but the electriorate doesn't.

If the Dems cave into the base on this they are going to pay the price. BIGTIME!

THE PETRAEUS REPORT

Reliapundit has pointed out the Democrats are defeatists and are discrediting Petraeus' report before it even comes out, here and here.

As I write this Petraeus is about ready to give his report and the Democrats are blathering on BEFORE Petraeus even talks about how bad things are in Iraq. Lantos is completely despicable!! Now, Duncan Hunter is showing why I LOVE him, he is taking Lantos and the Democrats to task.

Yet, I have to build on what Reliapundit has said about the Democrats being invested in defeat. They and their allies in the Media have been trashing the Petraeus' report before it had even come out. My own KC Star had this headline on the front page of yesterday's paper, Setbacks Outweigh Successes in Buildup and the small line at the top said this, "Little reason for optimism seen". No liberal bias there (sarcasm)!! And how sad that both seem so invested in defeat that they can't even root for their own country and their own soldiers.

Look at the successes in the Anbar province which Chuck Schumer trashed and yet, let us not forget that even the NY Times said this is a war we might just win. Even Katie Couric (of all people) came back from Iraq with positive things to say.

Yesterday, while the Democrats were on the Sunday morning shows sabotaging Petraeus, Senator Lindsay Graham shockingly, had this to say which I wholeheartedly agree with:
...the troop increase is "undeniably working" and that "the only way we're going to lose this war is to have politicians in Washington undercut the surge."

Rather than withdrawing, he said on Fox, "Now's the time to pour it on."

Gateway Pundit has an excellent post on this as well entitled, Media & Democrats Surge Against Surge Report. He links to a post the Prairie Pundit did where the author, Merv Benson is describing a poll that is the result of the attacks by the Democrats and the Drive By Media. He says it well:
The poll also showed the effect of the unceasing attacks on the President by the most disloyal opposition in war time in history. This story and others suggest that the democrats are willing to turn the same venomous attacks on military leaders in order to secure their desperation for defeat. The current democrat party is willing to say and do anything to insure our defeat in this war and history should judge them harshly. The American people need to wake up to what the disloyal opposition is doing.

I am reasonably sure that the 32 percent who do not trust the military are Democrats who make up the kook base of the party that is the driving force behind their desperation for defeat. They should be ashamed.
It is not enough to attack Bush, now they are going after Petraeus. Who as Gateway Pundit also points out was approved by the US Senate 81-0.

The Democrats are cowards who are invested in defeat and they have already made up their mind not to accept the Petraeus report no matter what good news it may have. Despicable!!