"Do we go forward towards a new vision of an America in which prosperity is shared?" Obama asked. "Or do we go backward to the same policies that got us in the mess in the first place?"1 - IN A FREE-MARKET ECONOMY THE GOVERNMENT PROPERLY HAS NO ROLE WHATSOEVER TO SEE THAT THERE IS "SHARED PROSPERITY".
PROSPERITY IS CREATED BY PRIVATE ENTERPRISE. BUSINESSES DO NOT FORCE PEOPLE TO BUY THEIR GOODS OR SERVICES.
WHEN POLITICIANS RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT TRY TO TAKE THE PRIVATE PROPERTY BUSINESSES AND PEOPLE EARN IN ORDER TO SPREAD IT AROUND FROM THOSE WHOSE TOIL AND RISK CREATED THE PROSPERITY TO THOSE WHO DID NOT, IT IS UNJUST AND UNFAIR.
IT IS SOCIALISM.
YES: WHEN POLITICIANS RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY AWAY FROM THE PRODUCERS TO GIVE IT TO OTHERS OF ITS CHOOSING, THEN THE GOVERNMENT IS SOCIALIST, PLAIN AND SIMPLE.
AND BECAUSE GOVERNMENT IS RUN BY POLITICIANS - WHO HAVE CRONIES AND SUPPORTERS - GOVERNMENTAL ALLOCATIONS WILL INEVITABLY BE POLITICAL AND BECAUSE POLITICIANS ARE HUMAN AND CORRUPTIBLE, THESE ALLOCATIONS WILL EVENTUALLY ALL BE CORRUPT. CORRUPT.
2 - THE POLICIES THAT GOT US INTO THIS MESS WERE NOT FREE-MARKET POLICIES; THEY WERE SOCIALISTIC POLICIES.
THE MESS WAS A RESULT OF TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN THE MARKETS, NOT TOO LITTLE.
(MORE HERE.)
FOLLOWING OBAMA'S LEFT-WING POLICIES IS GOING BACKWARD, NOT FORWARD.
VOTE ACCORDINGLY.
VOTE ROMNEY-RYAN.
No comments:
Post a Comment