WHO IS MORE LIKELY TO ATTRACT AND MOTIVATE MODERATES, CENTRISTS AND INDEPENDENTS TO MOVE TOWARD THE RIGHT-SIDE, A CANDIDATE WHO HIMSELF HAS MOVED TO THE RIGHT OR A CANDIDATE WHO ATTACKS THOSE WHO HAVE MOVED TO THE RIGHT AS BEING AN "UNRELIABLE CONSERVATIVES"?

OBAMA IS VULNERABLE IN THE SWINGS STATES - BUT IT'S NOT A DONE DEAL, YET...

FACT: 


The swing voters in these swing states are not the redmeat loving base of the GOP; the swing voters who will decide the outcome of the election are the independents and moderates in the swing states - voters who could swing either way.

SANTORUM MIGHT GET A HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF THE BASE IN A PRIMARY IN A CONSERVATIVE STATE, BUT HE WILL NOT GET THE INDEPENDENTS IN THE SWING STATES THAT WE NEED TO GET IN ORDER TO DEFEAT OBAMA.

WE NEED MORE AMERICANS TO ACCEPT THE FACT THAT LIBERAL POLICIES ARE A FAILURE AND CONSERVATIVE POLICIES WORK.

SHRILL ATTACKS AGAINST MITT --- BECAUSE HE WAS A LIBERAL 20 YEARS AGO, AND HAS GRADUALLY AND STEADILY MOVED RIGHT EVER SINCE --- ARE ONLY GOING TO TURN OFF THE VERY VOTERS WE NEED IN ORDER TO DEFEAT OBAMA.

WE WANT MORE PEOPLE TO MOVE TO THE RIGHT AND ATTACKING MITT FOR MOVING TO THE RIGHT WILL NOT MAKE THESE PEOPLE MORE LIKELY TO DO THE SAME.

END OF STORY.