ANATOMY OF ATTACKS: MITT'S ANCIENT HISTORY VERSUS NEWT'S RECENT HISTORY, AND CONSTANT PATTERN

NEWTNUTZ FREQUENTLY CITE THINGS MITT SAID IN THE 1990'S TO PROVE HE IS A LIB.

ALL THIS REALLY PROVES IS THAT MITT HAS STEADILY MORE CONSERVATIVE SINCE THE 1990'S.

MANY OF NEWT'S MAJOR PROBLEMS HAVE OCCURRED AS RECENTLY AS 2008:

• HE MADE A PRO-AGW TV COMMERCIAL WITH PELOSI 
• AND MADE A MILLION BUCKS SHILLING FOR FREDDIE MAC 
• AND ENDORSED DEDE SCOZZAFAVA IN 2009 - 
• WHILE MITT WAS ENDORSING AYOTTE AND HALEY AND WAS THE FIRST TO ENDORSE RUBIO.

YES, NEWTNUTZ: THERE IS ROMNEYCARE TO CONSIDER...

• ROMNEYCARE WAS PASSED IN 2006. TWO YEARS BEFORE HE WAS ENDORSED BY RUSH AND HANNITY AND LEVIN BECAUSE HE WAS TO THE RIGHT OF MCCAIN.

• ROMNEYCARE IS ALL OF 70 PAGES - NOTHING LIKE THE 2700 PAGE OBAMACARE.

• I THINK ROMNEYCARE IMMUNIZES ROMNEY FROM MEDISCARE TACTICS AND MAKES HIM THE MOST ATTRACTIVE CANDIDATE TO APPEAL TO CENTRISTS, MODERATES AND INDEPENDENTS WHO MIGHT OTHERWISE BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO SCARE TACTICS ON HEALTHCARE ISSUES.

• BECAUSE OF ROMNEYCARE, WHEN MITT SAYS HE WILL REPEAL OBAMACARE HE CANNOT BE PIGEON-HOLED BY THE LEFT AS AN UNCARING RETHUGLICAN WHO WANTS POOR PROPLE TO GET SICK AND DIE.

NEWT IS A CAREER POLITICIAN WHO TURNED HIS POLITICAL CONTACTS INTO A LOBBYING BUSINESS.

AS SUCH HE REPRESENTS THE WORST OF THE WORST. IF NEWT AIN'T A WASHINGTON INSIDER THAN NOBODY IS!

UNLIKE CLINTON WHOSE FOUNDATION DOES BIG PROJECTS GLOBALLY, NEWT HASN'T REALLY ACCOMPLISHED A DAMN THING SINCE LEAVING OFFICE. AND HE WAS #2 IN THE USA TO CLINTON FOR 4 YEARS.

MEANWHILE, MITT WAS AN EXTREMELY SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS MA WHO WAS TITHING, AND GIVING MILLIONS TO CHARITY AND SACRIFICED 3 YEARS OF HIS BUSINESS LIFE TO SAVE THE UTAH WINTER OLYMPICS AND HE WAS A GREAT POPULAR PRO-LIFE  GOVERNOR IN TH BLUEST STATE IN THE UNION.

WHILE NOT PHILANDERING AND NOT LOBBYING AND NOT MAKING A TV COMMERCIAL WITH PELOSI AND NOT ENDORSING PARTY HACKS LIKE SCOZZAFAVA.

MITT HAS BEEN STEADILY MOVING RIGHT IN A PRINCIPLED WAY, WHILE NEWT IS ALL OVER THE DAMN PLACE - ERRATIC, MERCURIAL, AND UNRELIABLE, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT HE'LL SAY NEXT AND WHAT HORNET'S NEST HE WILL STIR UP. THAT AIN'T PRESIDENTIAL.

I CHALLENGE ANY AND ALL NEWTNUTZ TO CORRECT ME ON ANY IF THESE POINTS AND PROVE TO ME WHY THE SERIAL ADULTERER AND SCOZZAFAVA ENDORSING PRO-PELOSI GINGRICH - WHO HAS 1/5TH AS MANY THE CONGRESSIONAL ENDORSEMENTS AS MITT - WOULD BE A BETTER MAN TO BE THE STANDARD-BEARER FOIR THE GOP AND WIN THE WHITE HOUSE.

BTW: THERE IS NOT ONE SINGLE SOLITARY POLL WHICH SHOWS NEWT DOING BETTER THAN MITT DOES AGAINST OBAMA.


THAT MEANS AS MUCH AS ANYTHING!


BOTTOM-LINE: I SAY, MAY THE BEST MAN WIN! AND IT'S CLEAR TO ME WHO IS THE BETTER MAN. IT AIN'T EVEN CLOSE.