HERE'S YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW THE NOBEL-PRIZE-WINNING 2007 IPCC REPORT IS RIDDLED WITH EXAGGERATED CLAIMS BASED ON NON-PEER-REVIEWED PAPERS FROM ADVOCACY GROUPS:
WUWT:
IPCC Gate Du Jour: Aussie DroughtgateTHE SCIENCE WHICH REALLY ISN'T SETTLED ISN'T EVEN REALLY SCIENCE!Andrew Bolt of the Herald Sun digs up another issue with non peer reviewed World Wildlife Fund reports in the IPCC AR4. It turns out a new paper in GRL handily disputes the cause of the drought.
AGW = TOTAL EFFIN BS.
RTWT@WUWT.
No comments:
Post a Comment