WHO HAS BETTER JUDGMENT, OBAMA OR BUSH?
BUSH HAS BETTER JUDGMENT, AND THE SURGE PROVES IT.
OBAMA OPPOSED THE SURGE CRITICIZING IT EVEN AS IT WAS BEGINNING TO WORK.
OBAMA EVEN REFUSED TO CONDEMN THE PETRAEUS/BETRAY US AD; ABC NEWS:
HAD OBAMA BEEN PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER IN CHIEF IN 2006, AL QAEDA AND IRAN WOULD BE IN CHARGE OF IRAQ.
AND OBAMA WOULD STILL BE APPEASING THEM.
NEVERTHELESS, OBAMA HAS THE AUDACITY TO BE RUNNING AGAINST MCCAIN AND CALLING IT AN EFFORT TO "PREVENT A THIRD TERM FOR BUSH".
THIS IS NONSENSE ONLY A LEFTIE WOULD BE DUMB ENOUGH TO FALL FOR.
OBAMA OPPOSED THE SURGE CRITICIZING IT EVEN AS IT WAS BEGINNING TO WORK.
OBAMA EVEN REFUSED TO CONDEMN THE PETRAEUS/BETRAY US AD; ABC NEWS:
Asked if they would condemn the MoveOn.org ad, the Democratic presidential frontrunners all demurred but tellingly, all of them refrained from criticizing Gen. Petraeus personally.
"Sen. Obama's question is not about General Petraeus's patriotism," said Bill Burton, spokesman for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. "It's about his logic. There's no evidence that this surge is producing the political progress needed to resolve the civil war in Iraq, or that it will be accomplished through more of the same.
HAD OBAMA BEEN PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER IN CHIEF IN 2006, AL QAEDA AND IRAN WOULD BE IN CHARGE OF IRAQ.
AND OBAMA WOULD STILL BE APPEASING THEM.
NEVERTHELESS, OBAMA HAS THE AUDACITY TO BE RUNNING AGAINST MCCAIN AND CALLING IT AN EFFORT TO "PREVENT A THIRD TERM FOR BUSH".
THIS IS NONSENSE ONLY A LEFTIE WOULD BE DUMB ENOUGH TO FALL FOR.
DON'T FALL FOR IT.
VOTE ACCORDINGLY.
MORE ON BUSHITLER MCCHIMPYBURTON HERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment