NYT GETS PULITZER FOR EXPLORING LIFE OF IMAM AND MOSQUE, FORGETTING TO MENTION ANTI-JEWISH SHOOTING RAMPAGES THING

The Pulitzers are awarded for journalism so inspirational in its topic and rigor as to be well above the average. It'd be interesting to find out, then, how Andrea Elliott's omission-filled journalistic roadkill was chosen for approbation:

The latest Pulitzer Prize awarded to the New York Times wasn't so honored when it originally came out -- by conservatives or even by some liberals. Andrea Elliott's three-part series exploring Islam in America through the imam Reda Shata of the Bay Ridge mosque in Brooklyn was powerfully critiqued by Washington Times columnist Diana West:

Both the New York Post and the New York Sun have already pounced on the most egregious flaw of omission: not a mention, in 11,000-plus words, of the day in March 1994 when a man walked out of that same Bay Ridge mosque and, inspired by the anti-Jewish sermon of the day (delivered by a different, unidentified imam), armed himself and opened fire on a van carrying Hasidic Jewish children. Ari Halberstam, 16, was killed. The Times series, as it happened, concluded on the 12th anniversary of his death.

First we have Nobel Peace Prizes awarded to people who dedicate themselves to genocidal warfare, and now we have the Pulitzers lauding journalists who do (at best) half-assed journalism. But hey, at least their hearts are in the right place.

[Cross-posted to Mere Rhetoric]