HILLARY AND HUGO: TWO FOR THE ROAD TO SERFDOM

TEXAS RAINMAKER HAS PROOF OF THEIR THE EERILY SIMILAR AGENDAS.

I WONDER WHY!? COULD IT BE... THERE BOTH SOCIALISTS? YES. (VIA HYSCIENCE.)

Her leftism notwithstanding, Hillary really could be elected. Especially if McCain runs on a third party line. What would an accurate Hillary slogan sound like? THIS:

PRESIDENT HILLARY: SO FAR TO THE LEFT, SHE'LL MAKE CARTER LOOK LIKE REAGAN.

PRESIDENT HILLARY: SHE'LL DO WHAT HENRY WALLACE AND MCGOVERN NEVER GOT TO DO.

YOU GET THE IDEA... ANYBODY BUT HILLARY. (OR OBAMA. OR EDWARDS...)

Note - regarding Henry Wallace:

Following his term as Secretary of Commerce, Wallace became the editor of The New Republic magazine, using his position to criticize vociferously Truman's hawkish foreign policy. On the declaration of the Truman Doctrine in 1947, he predicted it would mark the beginning of "a century of fear." He left his editorship position in 1948 to make an unsuccessful run as a Progressive Party candidate in the 1948 U.S. presidential election. ... Historians Schapsmeier and Schapsmeier argue (1970 p 181)

"The Progressive party stood for one thing and Wallace another. Actually the party organization was controlled from the outset by those representing the radical left and not liberalism per se. This made it extremely easy for Communists and fellow travelers to infiltrate into important positions within the party machinery. Once this happened, party stands began to resemble a party line. Campaign literature, speech materials, and campaign slogans sounded strangely like echoes of what Moscow wanted to hear. As if wearing moral blinkers, Wallace increasingly became an imperceptive ideologue. Words were uttered by Wallace that did not sound like him, and his performance took on a strange Jekyll and Hyde quality—one moment he was a peace protagonist and the next a propaganda parrot for the Kremlin."

... In 1952, Wallace published Where I Was Wrong, in which he explained that his seemingly-trusting stance toward the Soviet Union and Stalin stemmed from inadequate information about Stalin's excesses and that he, too, now considered himself an anti-Communist.

Wallace - like Hillary and McGovern - was pink to the core. All three underestimated the biggest enemy of their time. Wallace later saw the error of his ways. But had he been elected in 1948, we'd all be speaking Russian and working in collectives.

But beyond that: Nothing Hillary has ever said or done has ever given me the feeling that she "gets" WW4 - or has the executive ability to be a wartime CinC.

ADDENDUM: Wanna see what Hillarycare would really be like - then check out these video-taped HORROR STORIES of socialized healthcare in Canada.