Time for a Special Prosecutor: OBAMA DOJ PARTICIPATING IN HILLARY EMAIL COVER-UP

HOT AIR (ABC News):  

The Justice Department is affirming that former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton had the right to delete personal emails from her private server. Government lawyers made the assertion in a court filing this week in a public records lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, an advocacy group. The legal filing says “there is no question” that Clinton could have deleted personal emails without agency supervision and could have done so even if she’d been using a government server. 

Some additional coverage at Buzzfeed turns up this nugget. (Emphasis added) 

The back-and-forth over the preservation order, as part of a narrow FOIA case, does not address the classification issues that still command sustained political coverage about Clinton. 

But in terms of the email submission itself, the lawyers argue that,without reason to believe that Clinton was not honest and forthcoming in selecting and turning over her federal records, no government agency would be required to “recover deleted material based on unfounded speculation that responsive information had been deleted.” Such was the case with Clinton, the lawyers say. 

HOT AIR AGAIN: 

That’s a fairly amazing argument summed up in only a few words. On the one hand they offer a nod to the fact that Clinton repeatedly lied about sending and receiving classified data on this account.   

(Classified? Why would you think that satellite photos of North Korean nuclear installations were classified?)
But in the very next breath they argue that retention of all of the emails to sort out what was or wasn’t of value was not required because there was no reason to believe that Clinton was not honest and forthcoming.
The mind doth boggle.

BY EXPLICITLY STATING THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO DOUBT HILLARY'S HONESTY ON THIS ISSUE, THE DOJ IS COVERING UP FOR HILLARY.

IT IS THEREFORE TIME FOR A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR.

OBAMA BROKE US LAW WITH HIS HANDLING OF IRAN DEAL

In some good news, the US Congress has passed a resolution declaring that Obama broke US laws with the way he handled the faustian pact with Iran by not giving them proper access to the details of the agreement:

The House of Representatives is taking action against the Obama administration for failing to provide the texts of the side agreements between the IAEA and Iran, which is required under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015.

Just two hours after the Senate moved to block a resolution of disapproval of the Iran nuclear deal, the House passed Resolution 411 by a vote of 245-186.

Members of Congress have expressed concern that they have not been allowed to see the text of the agreements between the IAEA and Iran governing the protocols for nuclear inspections.

Indeed, the Obama administration itself has not seen these agreements, and is only aware of their general content. Some concerning details have emerged, such as that Iran will be responsible for collecting soil samples for testing by the IAEA. At the same time, Iranian leaders have been emphatic that they will not give inspectors access to conventional military sites where nuclear activity is suspected of taking place.

Very interesting! So even Obama's own administration is just leading a slapdash, half-hearted attempt to get something recorded for the sake of a place in history, no matter how it's seen as by future generations. Here's a video of Rep. Peter Roksam's discussion of the issue. Already, it's clear that this is one of the most deliberately ignorant deals ever made in history.

HARDCORE LEFTIST AND ANTISEMITE WINS BRIT LABOUR PARTY LEADERSHIP

Jeremy Corbyn, an oldtime, hardcore leftist - to this day an openly avid admirer of Karl Marx - and anti-blairite who hates jews and Israel, has won a huge victory and will now lead the brit Labour party.

The is not unlike Obama's victory over Hillary in 2008 and Sanders' leading Hillary now.

I think Corbyn's win  is actually great news for Britain: it will marginalize Labour and strengthen UKIP, and thereby improve the chances for brexit.

Brexit is essential in the continental battle to eradicate the EU, and defeating the Left's assault on the Free World.

I believe that Europe and the USA are at a crossroad.

If, in the coming elections - our potus election here, the brexit referendum in Britain, the presidential election in France, and national elections in Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, and Germany, (where anti-left/anti-immigration parties are thriving or growing) - the people choose pride in their own culture, faith in the free market, and courage in the face of ridicule by the leftist controlled mass media and academy, then the West - the USA and Europe - can be saved.

If Europe chooses the status quo, then - (and this is so very true for Europe because of the domination of the EU apparachiks and the prevalence of parliamentary proportional electoral systems) - it means that in a few decades that Europe shall surely devolve into a leftist/muslim-dominated continent that looks more like AKP dominated Turkey, than even Tory Britain, Socialist France, or Merkel's Germany.

If the USA chooses any democrat to be the next potus, then the entire free world will soon be entirely defenseless and ISIS, Iran, China, Putin and North Korea shall grow more powerful and influential.

The choice is in our hands, as it always has been. Deuteronomy 30:19

I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live.

I ask all people who favor continued mass immigration of muslims into Europe and the West, to look at the muslim dominated nations of the world and decide if they want their nation to become more like them, or not. 

That's the key choice we face right now and for the next two years.

I pray most choose wisely and choose life.

UN MIGRATION CHIEF ADMITS THEIR GOAL IS DESTROYING NATIONAL IDENTITIES WITHIN EUROPE

BBC:

The EU should "do its best to undermine" the "homogeneity" of its member states, the UN's special representative for migration has said. 

Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.

THE MASK SLIPS AND THE TRUTH SLIPS OUT.

THE EU AND UN ARE SEEKING TO DESTROY THE INDIGENOUS CULTURES OF EUROPE.

NO MORE DANISH CULTURE FOR DENMARK.

NO MORE FRENCH CULTURE FOR FRANCE.

AND SO ON.

JUST CHAOTIC MULTICULTURALISM WITH AN ACCENT ON ISLAM.

THIS IS CONTINENTAL SUICIDE.

I PRAY THAT EUROPEANS, PROUD OF THEIR CULTURES, FIGHT BACK TOOTH AND NAIL.

IF THEY FAIL AND THE UN AND EU WIN, THEN THE CONTINENT WILL SLIP INTO 1000 YEARS OF ISLAMOFASCIST DARKNESS.

WORSE THAN ANY HITLEE DREAMED OF.

AS NORTH SFRICA WAS DRIVEN INTO POVERTY AND IGNORANCE, SO TO WILL EUROPE.

ON THE 14TH YEAR SINCE 9-11, ISLAMIC STATE HAUNTS IT

Here's an editorial from USA Today for the 14th anniversary to the day when the jihad struck American soil. Unfortunately, there's subtle deceptions in here regarding the Koran:

Fourteen years ago, the United States suffered a shockingly successful surprise attack by a little known Islamic extremist group based 7,000 miles away in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. Since then, a U.S. invasion chased al-Qaeda out of its haven, and targeted strikes eventually eliminated most of its senior leaders, including Osama bin Laden in 2011. The danger from the group that killed nearly 3,000 Americans on Sept. 11, 2001, has waned.

Its influence lives on, however, through offshoot extremist groups that have eclipsed al-Qaeda — none more so than the Islamic State, the lightning spread of which through Syria and Iraq has been marked by medieval barbarity, adapted to the Internet age.

The group, also known as ISIL or ISIS, announced itself with carefully publicized video beheadings of captive Westerners and the burning alive of a Jordanian pilot inside a cage. Less visible in the West, but easy to find online, are gruesome videos of the slaughter of the group’s enemies.

As if mass murder weren’t enough, the group has regularized the rape and sexual slavery of women and girls it captures, justifying the brutality with twisted readings of the Quran. ISIL even issued a guide with 27 answers to militants’ questions, noting that the females’ “unbelief” makes it legal to enslave them.

"Twisted"? And they said all this without presenting a single verse from within the screedish scripture. They even stuck with the PC word "militants".

And while Islamic State is a danger, the whole notion the USA isn't still vulnerable is very naive thinking. There have been tons of terror attacks since, including the bloodbath at Fort Hood. And if that could occur, then attacks on a higher scale could happen again, and that's why we have to be alert in order to prevent such horrors from happening. The paper's just proven they're not as responsible as they want anyone to think.

PREDICTABLY, THE UN ALLOWS PLO TO FLY THEIR FLAG AT THE ASSEMBLY

The UN's PLO-worship goes even further as they voted to allow their dictatorial flag to be flown at the general assembly:

Palestinians overwhelmingly won the right to fly their national flag in front of the United Nations headquarters, a symbolic step opposed by Israel and the United States.

The change was made by the UN General Assembly, when a vast majority of member countries voted in favour of a resolution granting what are known as non-member observer states the right to fly their flags alongside member states.

[...] The Israeli ambassador, Ron Prosor, described the resolution as a cynical action. “Make no mistake, the goal of this resolution is a photo op,” Mr Prosor said.

“The Palestinians want to bring together world dignitaries and the media to gather around and watch as Mahmoud Abbas raises a flag. They plan to use the prestige of the UN as a backdrop for this charade.”

All those countries who gave their full backing to the PLO should be ashamed of themselves, and are showing as much disrespect for America as they are for Israel. Ron Prosor also said:

[...] Prosor, in his last speech to the UN General Assembly before returning to Israel after a four year stint as ambassador, took aim at the world body, saying that rather than flying the Palestinian flag, it might as well just wave a “white flag” and surrender its principles.

He argued that not only was the measure procedurally flawed, in that it was brought to a vote without the requisite debate and discussion, but it also allowed the Palestinians to manipulate the institution for its own public relations stunts.

“In my four years, I have seen hypocrisy, I have seen duplicity, and I have seen a triple standard -- one for democracies, one for dictatorships, and a special standard designed only for Israel,” Prosor said. “I thought I had seen everything,” he continued. “But I have to admit, this time, the Palestinian managed to take cynicism to a whole new level. The goal of this resolution is a photo op. The Palestinians want to bring together world dignitaries and the media to gather around and watch as [Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas] Abu Mazen raises a flag. They plan to use the prestige of the UN as a backdrop for this charade.”

No vote, Prosor said, can turn “empty symbolic gestures into a state.”

Instead of playing along, he said, “the international community must make it clear to the Palestinians that the only way to achieve statehood is through direct negotiations. As long as the Palestinians believe they can achieve their political goals without making concessions, they will continue to avoid taking the difficult decisions needed for peace.”

Prosor took a swipe at the EU, as some of its 28 members voted for the Palestinians, while some others abstained.

Regarding an imaginary resolution brought by the Palestinians declaring the world flat, the EU would “probably try to reach a consensus to abstain on the vote,” Prosor said. “But some EU countries would consider it a matter of principle to declare that the world is, indeed, flat -- if this is how the Palestinians see it.”

The EU's vaunted consensus on foreign policy matters, he said only holds firm when “their consensus is against Israel.” But, he said, tThe principle of “maintaining a holy consensus cannot withstand Palestinian pressure.”

Oh yes, the EU is just as dangerous as the UN. But what principles did the UN ever have? Nothing significant, I'm afraid. And now, they've been totally bankrupt for years.

A RALLY AGAINST THE IRAN DEAL AT CAPITOL HILL

Some GOP members organized a rally against the deadly deal with Iran:

Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz on Wednesday predicted the murder of "countless" Americans and Israelis should the proposed nuclear agreement with Iran go through, a graphic warning expected to be echoed by GOP front-runner Donald Trump at a Capitol Hill rally.

Those Democrats who support the deal, Cruz said, "should pray and think very carefully about how they will answer the questions that come from the mother or father or son or daughter of the countless Americans and Europeans and Israelis that will be murdered by Hamas, by Hezbollah, by the Houthis, with the billions of dollars this administration is sending them."

"If you are directly responsible for sending billions of dollars to jihadists who use those billions to murder Americans, you can't wash your hands of that blood," the first-term Texas senator told reporters in the Capitol shortly before the rally began.

At Cruz's invitation, Trump will also appear at the rally organized by tea party leaders and pro-Israel groups protesting the international agreement designed to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Republicans and Israel say Iran can't be trusted because its leaders want to annihilate the Jewish state.

They're correct. Furthermore, if Iran's government is running a violent autocracy back in their own country, how can any sane person view them legitimately? And the US government should not be wasting the citizenry's tax dollars - or any money, for that matter - on an evil entity that's only going to use the money to fund more evil operations.

BILLIONAIRE HYPOCRITE BUFFETT BLITHELY ADMITS HE SOMETIMES TRADES TO AVOID PAYING TAXES

CNBC:

On Tuesday, Buffett also said Berkshire would probably spend $32 billion in the next four to five months. "I still got money to buy. I'll never go below $20 billion in cash." 

He also discussed why Berkshire took a $4.48 billion stake in oil refinerPhillips 66, after having traded out of the stock in 2013. "We were able to do that on a tax-advantage basis. We didn't trade them because we didn't like the stock," Buffett said.

LIMOUSINE LIB AND HILLARY SUPPORTER BUFFETT FAMOUSLY SAID THAT HE THINKS IT'S WRONG HE PAYS LESS IN TAXES THAN HIS SECRETARY.

AND LIBS FAMOUSLY EAT THAT SHIT UP AND PRAISE HIM.

MEANWHILE, HE TRADES BILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF STOCK TO AVOID PAYING TAXES.

HE'S A PHONY AND A HYPOCRITE...

... ONE WHO HAS BENEFITTED FROM OBAMA'S REFUSAL TO APPROVE KEYSTONE; (HIS TRAINS CARRY THE OIL INSTEAD).

WHICH MAKES HIM A PART OF THE PROBLEM.

YET HE HAS THE AUDACITY TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE CITIZENS UNITED DECISION. (DID SO SEVERAL TIMES IN THE INTERVIEW LINKED TO ABOVE .)

WHAT A PIECE IF SHIT.

A RICH PIECE OF SHIT.

WHO STILL SUPPORTS HILLARY.

BETCHYA HE GAVE PRODIGIOUSLY TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.

AND WANTS HER ELECTED POTUS SO HE CAN COLLECT FAVORS FROM THE GOVERNMENT AS A RESULT.

MUSLIM COUNTRIES WANT TO USE THEIR POPULATIONS AS WEAPONS AGAINST THE WEST

Nonie Darwish wrote about why Arabic countries with oil whose profits they don't even use for improving their own turf are abandoning refugees going for Europe and such. But it's pretty easy to figure out why. They want to encourage all these badly educated people clogged with Islam to undermine the western countries so they can conquer them that way. And who knows if Europe will stand firm against them now?

ALL CULTURES ARE EQUAL

All cultures are equal.




You better believe it.

THE EU MIGRANT CRISIS BELONGS TO HILLARY CLINTON & BARACK OBAMA

The current migrant crisis in the EU was created by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

You don't believe it?

In 2011 Libyan dictator Moammar Qadhaffi predicted it:

Earlier in the day, Khadafy played the race card on TV, warning Europe that if he falls they will be deluged by hordes of illegal African immigrants.

"There are millions of blacks who could come to the Mediterranean to cross toFrance and Italy, and Libya plays a role in security in the Mediterranean," he told the France 24 television station.

"Libya may become the Somalia of North Africa, of the Mediterranean," Khadafy's son, Seif, added. "You will see the pirates in Sicily, in Crete, inLampedusa. You will see millions of illegal immigrants. The terror will be next door."

 When Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama decided to take out the Libyan dictator (was it because he had gone from anti-American to pro-American?), they opened up the pathways to Europe.

And by coddling the Iranians and their client, Bashir Assad, Obama encouraged the vicious war in Syria, which displaced millions.  Michael Gerson writing in the Washington Post:

For four years, the Obama administration has engaged in what Frederic Hof, former special adviser for transition in Syria, calls a “pantomime of outrage.” Four years of strongly worded protests, and urgent meetings and calls for negotiation — the whole drama a sickening substitute for useful action. People talking and talking to drown out the voice of their own conscience. And blaming. In 2013, President Obama lectured the U.N. Security Council for having “demonstrated no inclination to act at all.” Psychological projection on a global stage.

And:

What explains Obama’s high tolerance for humiliation and mass atrocities in Syria? The Syrian regime is Iran’s proxy, propped up by billions of dollars each year. And Obama wanted nothing to interfere with the prospects for a nuclear deal with Iran. He was, as Hof has said, “reluctant to offend the Iranians at this critical juncture.” So the effective concession of Syria as an Iranian zone of influence is just one more cost of the president’s legacy nuclear agreement.

Never mind that Iran will now have tens of billions of unfrozen assets to strengthen Assad’s struggling military. And never mind that Assad’s atrocities are one of the main recruiting tools for the Islamic State and other Sunni radicals. All of which is likely to extend a war that no one can win, which has incubated regional and global threats — and thrown a small body in a red T-shirt against a distant shore. 

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama created the current migrant crisis in the Mediterranean.

THE END IS NEAR, BUT SO TOO MIGHT BE A GREAT NEW AGE

The world of Islam is devolving into hell on earth... Iran about to go nuclear, ISIS increasing its brutality daily, and war and terror stretching within the islamic world from east Africa to southeast Asia

Europe is buckling under social and economic strain...

China's bubble economy about to burst and drag us all down with it....

The USA under Obama is becoming a second rate military power and a banana republic without the rule of law... drowning under unsustainable debt and an economy that can't employ 1/3 of its people...

Russia is lashing out at its neighbors in a desperate attempt to grow their economic pie, but with global energy aplenty - and cheap, Russia's prospects suck, too, because they really don't manufacture a damn thing anyone wants to buy except military hardware and vodka....

Turkey is getting ready for a national civil war as Erdogan and the AKP desperately try to hold onto power as their young people and their Kurds revolt - and they are flooded with refugees,..

Iran is about to get a nuke one way or another, by building it or buying it, but all this really does is bring the whole damn world closer to total annihilation...

Meanwhile India wallows around unable to develop its people or economy as China did and wary of Pakistan - whose nukes might easily fall under the control of islamists....

Meanwhile in northeast Asia, Japan has reached the demographic point of no return, and South Korea and North Korea edge ever closer to war...

WHAT CAN STOP THIS SEEMINGLY INEXORABLE CRASH OF HUMANITY ON EARTH?

I think only a few things that are on the near-term horizon:

1 - THE ADVENT OF COMMERCIAL FUSION ENERGY - which will provide clean cheap sustainable energy to all humanity and moot the anthropogenic climate change hysteria which has retarded economic growth and squelched improvements to QOL and life-spans for 1/3 of humanity.

2 - CURING CANCER AND MOST DISEASES, and greatly lengthening youthful lifespans. This will decrease most people's desire to use violence, terror and war, but make threats of same a more powerful weapon for a minority - a minority which might finally be eradicated since they threaten much more in a world in which people might live to be 150.

3 - NANOTECHNOLOGY WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING.

I think these three innovations could become a part of everday reality within the next ten years.

I'm just not sure that Weatern Civilization will last that long. 

In the next ten years, Iran, ISIS, China, North Korea, Pakistan, and Putin might ignite a global nuclear war.

Meanwhile, the attack on our civilizations foundations from within by Gramscian postmodern leftists threatens to destroy us from within.

And then there's the possibility of total, global economic collapse.

It seems to me that these three grave threats - (the hegemonistic mania of the totalitarian states and islamism which bring war and terror and destruction, and the socialistic utopian mania of so-called progressives who bring us economic and moral bankruptcy, libertinage, anarchy and decadence) - might easily lead humanity to total collapse within the next ten years.

As Yeats wrote right after the first global war:

THE SECOND COMING

    Turning and turning in the widening gyre

    The falcon cannot hear the falconer;

    Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

    Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,

    The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere

    The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

    The best lack all conviction, while the worst

    Are full of passionate intensity.

    Surely some revelation is at hand;

    Surely the Second Coming is at hand.

    The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out

    When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi

    Troubles my sight: a waste of desert sand;

    A shape with lion body and the head of a man,

    A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,

    Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it

    Wind shadows of the indignant desert birds.

    The darkness drops again but now I know

    That twenty centuries of stony sleep

    Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,

    And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,

    Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

The great pity is that our end will be of our own making.

We have the capacity to stop it, but the current crop of world leaders in the Free World, the Western World, do not have the will.

If I had to lay odds, I'd say the end comes before we make fusion and eternal youth - and a great new age of prosperity and creativity - a reality.

And what happens after the collapse?

The future after the seemingly unavoidable impending cataclysm depends on if a remnant survives, and who that remnant is.

It might very well be Iran. Or North Korea.

Imagine a whole world that looks like either of them.

I really believe the next president may very well be our last. And certainly be the last of this Age.

If we choose poorly and elect someone who carries obamunism forward, then we will surely be choosing our own end.

YES: ON THIS NEXT ELECTION RESTS THE FUTURE OF ALL HUMANITY.

Vote accordingly.

Vote as if the future of humanity depended on it.

And the future of your own soul, too...

ISRAEL PASSES TOUGH NEW ANTI-TERRORISM LAW

The Knesset approved the first reading of a bill for improvements in countering terrorism:

An upgraded counter terrorism law passed its first reading Thursday in the Knesset plenum.

Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked (Bayit Yehudi) sponsored the bill. She told journalists it was intended to provide authorities with the many tools needed to “lead an effective battle against terrorist organizations, both in fighting their expanding activities and the funding that enables such activity.

“We believe that passing the Terror Act, in its current version is a necessary and vital step to advance the fight against terror,” she said. “In this fight, there is no ‘Left’ and ‘Right,’” she emphasized.

[...] Under the new law, administrative detentions will be legalized, and those who support terrorism will receive up to three years’ imprisonment. The definition of terror support will include posting praises of terrorism online, waving flags connected with terror activity, etc.

In addition, accomplices to such crimes will receive the same penalties as perpetrators.

The maximum prison term will be raised to 30 years for terror-related crimes as well.

It's certainly time this was done.

VIDEO: CRUZ POLITELY AND TOTALLY DEMOLISHES A CLIMATE ALARMIST AMBUSH

12 FACEBOOK ACCOUNTS BELONGING TO UN STAFF PROMOTING ANTISEMITISM EXPOSED

UN Watch discovered 12 Facebook accounts promoting antisemitism and violence:

UN Watch released a new report today documenting 12 different Facebook accounts operated by UNRWA officials (see images below) that openly incite to antisemitism and terrorism, and urged UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and UNRWA chief Pierre Krähenbühl to terminate the responsible officials, condemn the offending posts, and establish a commission of inquiry, comprised of representatives of top donor states (see chart at right), to investigate the culture of impunity for perpetrators of racism and incitement that pervades UNRWA.

“The pattern and practice of UNRWA school principals, teachers and staff members posting antisemitic and terror-inciting images suggests a pathology of racism and violence within UNRWA that must be rooted out, not buried, as UNRWA spokesman Chris Gunness has attempted to do by calling for boycotts of newspapers or NGOs that report these incidents of hate,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, a non-governmental Geneva watchdog organization.

“The UN must recognize that these disgusting posts, published on Facebook accounts run by people who identify themselves as UNRWA officials, constitute a gross violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which prohibits “incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence,” said Neuer.

Unfortunately, knowing how the UN's staff operate, there's little chance they'll ever take disciplinary action against any of these ghouls.

ALAN KISTLER DOESN'T KNOW THE MEANING OF THE WORD ISLAM (OR MUSLIM)

Yet this would-be comics historian thought to write the following comment about a Florida gun manufacturer who designed a model with a bible verse upon it to discourage Muslims from using it:

I... I don't think this person actually knows what the word Muslim MEANS. https://t.co/wu4wLbQeHE

— Alan Sizzler Kistler (@SizzlerKistler) September 3, 2015

Well maybe the person you speak of doesn't know what it means, Mr. Kistler, but then, what about you? Do you know the meaning of the word Islam? Well then, let me school you a bit. It translates in Arabic as "submission" and "surrender", and let me point you to a Muslim in Britain named Anjem Choudhary who confirms it in his very own words (H/T: Jihad Watch):

Although both George W. Bush and Barack Obama have declared that Islam is a religion of peace, Choudary begs to differ.

A Religion of Peace?

“You can’t say that Islam is a religion of peace,” Choudary told CBN News. “Because Islam does not mean peace. Islam means submission. So the Muslim is one who submits. There is a place for violence in Islam. There is a place for jihad in Islam.”

Choudary is the leader of Islam4UK, a group recently banned in Britain under the country’s counter-terrorism laws. He wants Islamic Sharia law to rule the United Kingdom and is working to make that dream a reality.

So now you know what it means, Mr. Kistler. But I guess it means zero to your dismissive mindset, eh? And I guess you're not worried about Islamofascists using guns for violence against infidels either? What a shame. He just can't appreciate some creativity if that's what can help to prevent jihadists from using certain companies' products and leaving the company staff burdened with guilt that their products were used for evil. Let us be clear: no sane business worker wants to be blamed for giving an enemy rope to hang them with. And if the Florida gunmaker thinks this could help prevent their products from being exploited for evil, then they should be given some credit for trying to find ways to keep their weapons from getting into the wrong hands. Kistler, alas, doesn't have the courage to thank them for their efforts.

"PERSONAL GUILT" VERSUS "COLLECTIVE GUILT" IS RIGHT VERSUS LEFT

In  the West, Christianity solved the problem of personal guilt: one inevitably sinned, but could be forgiven if one sincerely repented and changed for the better.

The state of society was left to Caesar; the state of your soul was in your hands alone.

As postmodernism eroded the concepts of personal sin and hence guilt - (by arguing that morality is culturally relative and not universal, and that traditional social mores were repressive and needed to be overthrown) - they were replaced by collective sin and collective guilt: society was guilty of certain "sins"; therefore society had to be changed "for the better". This is the core moral argument for progressivism.

Liberalism in general - and its bastard sons progressivism and leftism - are attempts to solve the problem of personal sin and collective guilt. Individuals don't have to behave in a traditionally upright moral manner, or are absolved if they fail to, as long as they support to collectivist agenda to rid society as a whole of its collective sins.

These collective sins are racism, sexism, colonialism, capitalism, and traditional Judeo-Christianity.

Today, one can personally be guilty of any traditional sin, and even be guilty of personally transgressing a collective sin, but be absolved of these sins if one also supports the liberal agenda.

And the agenda doesn't even have to be effective at changing society for the better for it to be able to assuage the guilt of the liberal who transgresses.

This is how limousine liberals who jet around all the time and own huge homes and rent ginormous yachts and otherwise have enormous carbon footprints can still see themselves - and are seen by other liberals - as climate crusaders.

This is why they can support and want to mainstream all sorts of personal salacious libertine behaviors that have been seen as anarchistic and immoral by most cultures for most of human history.

This is the basis of liberation theology - a religion that puts personal salvation to the side and instead emphasizes collective sins and collective guilt and collective salvation.

This is why liberals blame society for the crimes individual criminals choose to commit.

This is what motivates liberals' desire to control healthcare, energy, CO2, H2O, and regulate all commerce and trade: they see the marketplaces which freely set prices for these things and freely create winners and losers as selfish, greedy personal efforts which create too few winners and too many losers. They feel that a collective overhaul which fixes prices and allocates resources from on high can fix things so that the price is abstractly fair and the goods or services fairly distributed to all members of the collective.

This effort has always failed, and Friedman explained why.

The goal of the liberal is not personal salvation; it is utopia... a sort of collective heaven here on Earth.

History has shown that these liberal collective policies inevitably create a hell on Earth.

So, why do liberals persist in advocating them?

They persist because it makes them feel good about themselves - regardless of what they do personally to positively effect the problems they see and regardless of how abominably they behave in their private lives.

Liberalism allows liberals to behave badly - to sin - in their personal lives and allows them to feel good about themselves becaue they support attacking collecfive sins.

Hence their support for a sexually permissive nannystate that feeds, clothes, and shelters them from cradle ti grave and even allows them drug abuse.

I think Bill and Hillary Clinton epitomize this at the current time.

They ar liars, cheaters, thieves and possibly traitors who see themselves and are seen by many liberals as great people because of their efforts at bolstering the collective.

But they are truly sinful and evil people.

One of the few truly collective responsibilities we have as a nation is national defense: individually we cannot defend our nation from external threats.

And it is no coincidence that liberals always attack this truly common cause.

A strong national defense perpetuates our nation, and anything that perpetuates our nation also perpetuates the West and Judeo-Christian Civilization - things they hate.

A key reason they hate them is that a cornerstone of this civilization - and the system of government it gave rise to after thousands of years of struggle, self government - is individualism.

And nothing is more threatening to a collective hell-bent on creating a utopia on Earth than the individual who wants to live his own life in accordance with how she and he see eternal, traditional and times-tested values.

Salvation is personal.

Unless you are a liberal.

Obama knows this and has spoken about it many times:

This is why fighting liberalism is not just a fight for our nation, for the West and the Free World or Judeo-Civilization; it is a fight for your soul. 

And this is why, if you give into the left, you have surrendered your soul.

BOMBSHELL: Current and former Clinton lawyers in coordinated email cover-up

At least four classified Hillary Clinton emails had their markings changed to a category that shields the content from Congress and the public, Fox News has learned, in what State Department whistleblowers believed to be an effort to hide the true extent of classified information on the former secretary of state’s server. 

The changes, which came to light after the first tranche of 296 Benghazi emails was released in May, was confirmed by two sources -- one congressional, the other intelligence. The four emails originally were marked classified after a review by career officials at the State Department. But after a second review by the department's legal office, the designation was switched to "B5" -- also known as "deliberative process," which refers to internal deliberations by the Executive Branch. Such discussions are exempt from public release.   

The B5 coding has the effect, according to a congressional source, of dropping the email content "down a deep black hole." 

According to recent congressional testimony, at least one of the lawyers in the office where the changes were made is Catherine “Kate” Duval, who now handles the release of documents to the Benghazi select committee and once worked for the same firm as Clinton's private attorney David Kendall. 

Fox News is told there were internal department complaints that Duval, and a second lawyer also linked to Kendall, gave at the very least the appearance of a conflict of interest during the email review. A State Department spokesman did not dispute the basic facts of the incident, confirming to Fox News the disagreement over the four classified emails as well as the internal complaints. But the spokesman said the concerns were unfounded. 

The whistleblowers told intelligence community officials that they did not agree with the B5 changes, and the changes had the effect of shielding the full extent of classified content on the server. The incident was referenced in a Washington Times report mid-August, but this is the first time fuller details have been available. Because the emails are now marked B5, or deliberative, it is impossible to know the content and relevance to the congressional and FBI investigations. 

The internal State Department disagreement was so significant that it rose to the level of Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy, who is deeply involved in the email controversy, as Clinton's server arrangement required his formal signoff or tacit approval. Asked who signed off on the private server on Tuesday, State Department spokesman Mark Toner said, "I personally don't know."

RTWT.

THE SCUMMIEST LAWYERS DEPICTED IN "THE GOOD WIFE" WOULDN'T DO WHAT HILLARY, KENDALL AND DUVAL ARE DOING.

THEY DESERVE TO BE CHARGED, TRIED AND CONVICTED AS TRAITORS AND CONSPIRATORS AFTER THE FACT.

THE IRAN CAPITULATION: DEFINING VICTORY DOWN: OBAMA WINS WITH ONLY 33% SUPPORT, WITHOUT GETTING ANY BIPARTISAN SUPPORT

NYTIMES:

Two Democratic senators threw crucial support behind the Iran nuclear deal on Tuesday, almost assuring that President Obama would have the votes to overcome congressional opponents seeking to derail the landmark accord.  

The announcements by the senators, Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and Chris Coons of Delaware, came a week before the Senate returned to formally debate a Republican resolution disapproving the accord among Iran and six world powers.  

With the support of Mr. Casey and Mr. Coons, the chances of Congress torpedoing it are becoming ever more slim. Mr. Coons, an outspoken voice on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, received personal, written assurances from Mr. Obama on Tuesday on a range of concerns before throwing his weight behind the deal.  

In the House, Representative Adam Smith of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee and an important voice in his party, also came out in favor of the deal on Tuesday. The decisions by Mr. Coons and Mr. Casey were hardly made without reservations.

WHEN VICTORY IS DEFINED AS ONLY BARELY GETTING 33% OF YOUR OWN PARTY'S SUPPORT...

... AND ONLY GETTING THAT PITIFUL AMOUNT WITH OPENLY EXPRESSED RESERVATIONS (ASS-COVERING)...

... THEN YOU HAVE NOT REALLY MET THE MINIMAL LEVEL OF SUPPORT NECESSARY FOR SUCH A MOMENTOUS DEAL.

OBAMA CAPITULATED TO IRAN...

AND CONGRESS APPEARS TO BE CAPITULATING TO OBAMA...

NOT A MAJORITY OF CONGRESS, BUT JUST ENOUGH TO MAKE OBAMA AND KERRY'S CAPITULATION TO IRAN A DONE DEAL.

THIS MUST NOT STAND.

IRAN'S BALLISTIC STOCKPILE

It's been confirmed they have a whole stash (via Pajamas Media):

Israel is keeping a “very sharp eye” on Iran’s modernized ballistic missile arsenal and will be “ready to respond” should the Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) attempt to export the new Fateh 313 to Lebanon- or Syria-based proxies, a defense official says.

“We assess that Iran has begun to stockpile them,” the official said of the 500-kilometer-range, solid-fueled missile, unveiled in Aug. 22 ceremonies for National Defense Industry Day in the presence of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani. “You can be sure we are monitoring any attempt to move these out of the country by air, land or sea.”

He added, in a not-so-cryptic reference to the multiple times weapon shipments have either been seized on the high seas or attacked by air, “Our red lines are very clear to all and we are obliged to act on them.”

…the precision-delivered system would be extremely lethal in the hands of Hezbollah.

“It means that from the farthest point in Lebanon, this missile can accurately hit high-value targets throughout Israel,” he said.

And while Iranian officials have stated that the missile is ready to enter production, Inbar concurred with the defense official who assessed that the Fateh 313 was already in serial production.

And Obama's policies have only made the situation worse by encouraging them to make more rockets.

TEN QUESTIONS WHICH DEMOLISH OBAMA'S IRAN DEAL

1. You have argued that the Iran deal enhances Israel’s security and those of our Arab Gulf allies. 

At the same time, your administration has offered the Gulf states a huge security package by way of compensation and you have expressed frustration that the government of Israel has not yet entered into discussions with you to discuss ways to bolster its security. 

But isn’t this a paradox? 

If the Iran deal bolsters their security, shouldn’t their security needs be going down, not up?

ITS NOT A PARADOX. 

ITS PROOF THE DEAL HURTS THE SECURITY OF OUR ALLIES IN THE REGION AND ONLY HELPS IRAN.

NINE MORE AT THE LINK. (Now fixed thanks to bruce hall)

BILL O'REILLY SHOWS OFF HIS IGNORANCE OF ISLAM

People's Pundit Daily addressed the Fox news host's ignoramus side:

Calling jihad a perversion of Islam is nothing but a demonstrative show that Bill O’Reilly is incredibly ignorant of Islam, or has succumbed to Civilization Jihad. Jihadists claim they are dying for Islam. They have the exact same beliefs as those Muslims who attend Jumma prayers each Friday at their local mosques.

How do we know this to be true versus Bill O’Reilly’s foolish belief that Jihad is a perversion of Islam?

Tarek Fatah pointed out on January 10, 2015 that “[there] is a specific ritual prayer uttered by most Mosque Imams just prior to the formal Friday prayer we Muslims refer to as the Juma’a. In the prayer, the clerics ask Allah among other things to give victory to Muslims over the ‘Qawm al-Kafirun,’ the Arabic phrase that lumps all non-Muslims, that is Jews, Hindus, Christians, Atheists, Buddhists and Sikhs into one.”

O'Reilly isn't just ignorant of Koranic themes. He's also ignorant of the many Islamofascists who've confirmed the opposite of what he says, including Recep Erdogan. He acts like they don't exist. He's not fit for his job.