When a proposal to encourage end-of-life planning touched off a political storm over “death panels,” Democrats dropped it from legislation to overhaul the health care system.
But the Obama administration will achieve the same goal by regulation, starting Jan. 1.Under the new policy, outlined in a which may include advance directives to forgo aggressive life-sustaining treatment.
regulation, the government will pay doctors who advise patients on options for end-of-life care,Congressional supporters of the new policy, though pleased, have kept quiet. They fear provoking another furor like the one in 2009 when Republicans seized on the idea of end-of-life counseling to argue that the Democrats’ bill would allow the government to cut off care for the critically ill.
The final version of the health care legislation, signed into law by
in March, authorized Medicare coverage of yearly physical examinations, or wellness visits. The new rule says Medicare will cover “voluntary advance care planning,” to discuss end-of-life treatment, as part of the annual visit.Under the rule, doctors can provide information to patients on how to prepare an “advance directive,” stating how aggressively they wish to be treated if they are so sick that they cannot make health care decisions for themselves.
While the new law does not mention advance care planning, the Obama administration has been able to achieve its policy goal through the regulation-writing process, a strategy that could become more prevalent in the next two years as the president deals with a strengthened Republican opposition in Congress.
WHEN THE GOVERNMENT PAYS FOR SENIORS' HEALTHCARE AND YOUR PENSION, THEN THEY GET A DOUBLE WINDFALL WHEN SENIORS DIE;
THEREFORE, THE SOONER SENIORS DIE THE BETTER.
REDUCING END -OF-LIFE CARE AND ENCOURAGING SENIORS TO DIE SOONER IS A GOAL OF OBAMA AND THE LEFT - IT'S HOW THEY INTEND TO SAVE MONEY.
IT'S HOW OBAMA AND THE LEFT INTEND TO SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE, AND REDUCE CARBON EMISSIONS.
A LEFTIST TRIFECTA.
ABORTIONS AND EUTHANASIA CAN HELP THE LEFT REDUCE GLOBAL HUMAN POPULATION - ANOTHER LONG-TERM GOAL OF THE LEFT.
LOOKIT FOLKS:
DECIDING TO REFUSE CARE IS FINE - POPE JOHN PAUL 2 DID IT. IT'S FINE IF THE DECISION IS MADE BETWEEN THE PATIENT, HIS DOCTOR AND HIS G-D.
WHAT'S WRONG IS WHEN THE GOVERNMENT IS INVOLVED -
OR WHEN THE DOCTOR INVOLVED NO LONGER IS CARING FOR THE PATIENT AS MUCH AS HE IS WATCHING THE BUDGET,
OR BEING MORE MINDFUL OF PUBLIC HEALTH THAN OF THE PATIENT'S HEALTH.
UNFORTUNATELY, OBAMACARE HAS US HEADED TOWARD DEATH PANELS: GETTING SENIORS TO FORGO MEDICAL CARE FOR THE "COMMON GOOD".
THIS IS A MAJOR REASON IT MUST BE ERADICATED.
9 comments:
It isn't just the people over 65 that Obama is trying to kill.
He's also out to destroy those of us who are "too old to rehire, but too young to retire."
See: Who are the 99ers?
Damn.
When Mr. AOW had his stroke back in September 2009, he defied all odds for survival.
He continues to defy all odds as he now walks, has regained continence, etc.
He is now able to go out for nights with the boys at our local VFW and American Legion. So, Mr. AOW has a pretty good quality of life -- even though we do have some difficult routines here at home.
I don't believe in heroic measures when decent recovery isn't possible; I didn't authorize intubation or a feeding tube -- such was the agreement between Mr. AOW and me ever since his brain surgery of 1994.
My guess is that The Nanny State would have written Mr. AOW off.
exactly AOW.
BTW: I hope u an he and all yours had a wonderful Christmas and a good and great New Year!
You would think that if Republicans wanted to totally mischaracterize a health care provision and demagogue it like nobody’s business, they would at least pick something that the vast majority of them hadn’t already voted for just a few years earlier. Because that’s not just shameless, it’s stupid.
Yes, that’s right. Remember the 2003 Medicare prescription drug bill, the one that passed with the votes of 204 GOP House members and 42 GOP Senators? Anyone want to guess what it provided funding for? Did you say counseling for end-of-life issues and care? Ding ding ding!!
http://www.senate.iowa.gov/democrats/time-grassley-voted-for-end-of-life-care-legislation-in-2003/
Comments here reflect a serious depth of ignorance regarding the need and use of advance directives. Before shooting off your mouth about this policy I recommend consulting first with a few qualified experts. Your local hospital chaplains, long-term care facilities staff, EMT responders, CCRT and assisted living directors, and hospice resources are all good places to start. Go to the yellow pages and take your pick. (Ignorance should be embarrassing but it seems to be in style these days.)
Great post. One of the best, and most important, ever.
paine u feckin ass; i am a democrat - have been since 1974.
i am a conservative - unlike dubya bush who was a lib like lbj.
conservatives and libertarians hate obamacare and socialism, many gop'ers are rino's and/or libs who've been duped into thinking a little socialism is ok.
feck off.
john;
u think i haven't!?!? u think i haven't dealt with these issues personally more than once!?!?
fuck off.
really: FUCK YOU.
as the post says: this is a PRIVATE matter between the patient and his doctor and G-d and family.
the problem is GOVERNMENT involvement.
WAKE UP YOU DUPED PIECE OF LIBERAL SHITE!
and another thing asll you liberal dupes:
this provision was taken out in Congress.
because the people wanted it out.
NOW...
obama - like the fascist he is - is going ahead with it via REGULATIONS.
like chavez.
scum. liberal fascist scum.
Post a Comment