BOTH CHEATERS.
- BUT THE LEFT - AND THE MEDIA THE DOMINATE AND THE PARTY THEY CONTROL - DON'T CARE.
- IT SEEMS TO ME WE SHOULD HAVE HEARD THE NAME VERA BAKER AS MUCH IN THIS ELECTION CYCLE AS WE HEARD THE NAME FOLEY IN THE LAST ELECTION.
- AND MACACCA.
- BUT WE HAVEN'T.
- GEE... I WONDER WHY!?
4 comments:
There, there. Time for your meds to alleviate the bizarre illusions you have about human beings who are different than you.
craig, your comment says more about you than me.
it's personal.
it disregards the facts of the post.
fact: macacca and foley become the focus of the msm's 2006 coverage.
the washpost ran 165 stories on macacca and the nets were foley non-stop.
but vera baker has not gotten one single story in thye msm.
and the mahoney thing got a few and it's over.
pew research and many other orgs - like harvard's kennedy school - have founds over and over agaon that there is amazing bias in the msm - pro-dem and lib.
people know this.
you are in denial on this.
as you are on obama: the least experienced most leftist candidate ever.
a proven liar.
and an adulterer.
worse than clinton.
i supported clinton once.
i will never make that kind of mistake again.
wake up, craig; you don't have to be a dupe.
you crossed the line mccoy.
like ol' times.
FACT: macacca and foley got non-stop coverage.
vera baker and mahoney got relatively ZERO coverage.
end of story.
Post a Comment