The first plane was on its way to Heathrow in London. The second plane was flying out of London to Thailand.
1st incident
2nd incident (first reported by IBA contributor Ray Boyd)
Both stories note that this was a higlhly unusual occurrence. And yet, it happened twice in a week?
Jets often fly back and forth on the same route. Could both of these jets have been on routes which took them in and out of London on an almost daily basis? And, if so, is this an act of terrorism?
It looks like it very well could be.
And, if it is, is the culprit, or culprits behind this attack alive and ready to do it again?
Let's try to dig up more on this.
1st incident
2nd incident (first reported by IBA contributor Ray Boyd)
Both stories note that this was a higlhly unusual occurrence. And yet, it happened twice in a week?
Jets often fly back and forth on the same route. Could both of these jets have been on routes which took them in and out of London on an almost daily basis? And, if so, is this an act of terrorism?
It looks like it very well could be.
And, if it is, is the culprit, or culprits behind this attack alive and ready to do it again?
Let's try to dig up more on this.
4 comments:
Actually, Pastorius, the first jet in the first story you linked was flying FROM Heathrow TO Bangkok. That's more suggestive of something happening in Londonistan, isn't it?
Sheesh.
Thanks for pointing that out. I was in a hurry. I'll fix it.
my guess: on board computers were hacked into from cabin or grund.
I wish we had a pilot here to comment. A guy commented over at IBA that the computer systems which guide 747's and 777's are completely different and thus he thought there was no relation between these two incidents.
Post a Comment