"Mein Kampf" is one of the dozen or so books I keep in front of me on my table where I do my writing. I even read it sometimes. It is a very important document for conservatives to read -- showing as it does how close in thinking Hitler was to modern Leftists -- including the antisemitism, of course. Some excerpts from an article in The Times of London:
Horst Moeller, a leading German historian, has called for the book to be published openly for the first time since 1945. The Bavarian state authorities own the copyright to Hitler's writings, but maintain an effective ban by refusing all requests to print it. Officially, the book cannot be bought in Germany, Israel, Norway or Switzerland. It is illegal to own it in Austria and to sell it in the Netherlands. But the book is available for sale in the US and Britain, as well as through internet bookshops. About 3,000 copies are sold every year in the UK.
Holocaust survivors are understandably unhappy at the prospect of a book that caused such bloodshed becoming freely available once more in the country that gave birth to Nazism. Yet whatever sympathy one may feel for those who suffered, no book should be banned, however pernicious. Allowed to fester in the dark corners of neo-Nazism, Hitler's ideas continue to hold a spurious glamour for the twisted few: held up to the light, they shrivel. In treating this disease, exposure to fresh air is always more effective than quarantine.
Quite apart from the issue of free speech, there is the practical consideration that book-banning is virtually impossible in the internet age. The Nazis themselves tried, and failed, to ban and burn the "degenerate" books they feared, and in the process lent those works underground status. Today any neo-Nazi with half a brain (rather more than the usual complement), can download Mein Kampf and feel aggrieved and special for having to do so in secret.
Source
(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)
16 comments:
JIHAD MEANS MEIN KAMPF - ANOTHER PARALLEL.
AS IS THE FACT THAT CHIRAC CALLED HIS MEMOIR MEIN KAMPF, TOO.
M'HHM'D, HITLER, CHIRAC: BIRDS OF A FEATHER?
You can read "Mein Kampf" in html at Hitler.org natch.
pdfs are easy to find too!
JR if you could give Chapter and verse of Our Left compared to the NASDP it would be a great service. especially since it would be from source material instead of second or third hand interpretations.
I suggest this because you seem familiar with the material.
RP - make sure JR gets a heads up on this.
Given that the primary arguments of Mein Kampf are of racial superiority and the need for racial purity, I fail to see the connection to modern Leftism.
Strom Thurmon, maybe, but Barak Obama? I think not.
david " u r wrong: mein kampf is a socialist tract. read it. and u can read other national socialist books too.
they read lie all socialist stuff. like chavez. like mugabe.
all about the volk.
jr's site "DISSECTING LEFTISM" ios filled with links to scholarly papers proving that hitler was a LEFTTST and nazism socialist.
I've read Hitler's book, and also read plenty of opinions on Hitler's beliefs. Bottom Line: everybody likes to accuse the other side of being the Nazis.
PS: I have already pulled an entire page of classic quotes from Mein Kampf, illustrating Hitler's goals of racial purity, an offical national language, trampling the "Marxist serpent," promoting the death penalty for deserters, and plenty other things the NeoCons have been calling for daily.
If you want to debate them, (or disown them) I'll post them here for you.
J.R. and M. Simon,
I am absolutely with you guys on this. Mein Kampf should be published freely everywhere.
And, people ought to read it if they read history.
One very important fact to note about Hitler and Mein Kampf is that Hitler was much less clear about what he intended to do about the "Jewish question" than the Islamofascists are on the subject of what they want to do about the Jews.
We ought to take quite a big fucking lesson from that, but no one ever talks about it.
Reliapundit,
I checked out David Cyrus' Profile Page. Here's what I learned:
Interests
Progressive Politics Skewering Rightist Philosophies Stand-Up Comedy 10K Races
Favorite Movies
Blade Runner
Favorite Music
Grateful Dead
Favorite Books
Illusions- by Richard Bach
Reliapundit,
I checked out David Cyrus' Profile Page. Here's what I learned:
Interests
Progressive Politics Skewering Rightist Philosophies Stand-Up Comedy 10K Races
Favorite Movies
Blade Runner
Favorite Music
Grateful Dead
Favorite Books
Illusions- by Richard Bach
Reliapundit,
I think David's comment is proof that an article on the subject would be a good idea.
BTW David, You forgot possibly former KKK member Byrd. Currently a Senator on the Democrat side.
In fact I'm led to believe that a bigger % of Repubs voted for the Civil Rights Act than Dems. Go figure.
"JR if you could give Chapter and verse of Our Left compared to the NASDP it would be a great service. especially since it would be from source material instead of second or third hand interpretations"
Already online:
http://ray-dox.blogspot.com/2006/08/this-article-is-published-on-internet.html
Pastorius: You can learn a lot more from my posts than you can from my profile.
Byrd (and Wallace) were both segregationist fools. There were many on both sides of the aisle.
I forget now, are you trying to label modern Leftists as Nazis, or the sothern Dixiecrats? Because if we compare Civil Rights Act voting by region (north & south) the Republicans, in all cases, gave less support to the act.
You won't hear Democrats pining away for the good ol' days of segregation, either (e.g., Trent Lott).
I invite debate from any Astutor who thinks he can spin lines like, "…the State teaches our young men democratic and pacifist ideas and thus deprives millions and millions of their national instincts, poisons their logical sense of patriotism and gradually turns them into a herd of sheep who will patiently follow any arbitrary command." into Leftist agenda.
No David, I think we can learn a lot from your profile page.
David,
I'm a Dead Head (since '67) AND am a BIG FAN of "Blade Runner".
You never know how much time you've got. Love for real not fade away.
The Dems don't have to pine away for race based policies. They are implementing them today and howl when such policies are voted out or struck down.
Let me give it to you simple - Dems used to be for race based policies that advantaged whites. Now they favor race based policies that favor blacks and other minorities. The Dems haven't changed policy. Just the target of discrimination.
jr,
Why not put the url up with a html wrapper?
Second. That url didn't work.
After a full morning of J.R. essay review, (accompanied by "Dozin' at the Knick" on CD) I can agree with the following J.R. statements:
"...there is no claim that Hitler was WHOLLY like modern democratic Leftists."
"And we all know how evil Nazi eugenics were, don't we? How crazy were their efforts to build up the "master race" through selective breeding of SS men with the best of German women -- the "Lebensborn" project? Good Leftists today recoil in horror from all that of course."
"The Nazis, with their youth camps and praise of strong bodies and a strong people, endorsed all that, and soon were killing the retarded, the gay and the different."
"The modern day Left do not see that their promoting of infinite diversity will undermine support for socialism. Hitler did."
"They are pre-war Leftists, just as Hitler was. They are a relic in the modern world of thinking that was once common on the Left but no longer is.
...and finally: "Hitler's brand of socialism was, then, a cleverer one than most: It had something for everybody. He stole the emotional clothes of both the Left and the Right,
...which was pretty much what I said from the get-go.
Post a Comment