Childhood trauma, but not adult trauma, is strongly associated with depression and coronary heart disease in adulthood, say Emory University researchers and colleagues presenting at the American Psychosomatic Society Annual Meeting, being held March 7-10 in Budapest, Hungary.Child abuse is one of the most pressing problems we have in the world brcause it leads to all kinds of maladaptive behavior and can also lead to illegal drug use as a form of self medication.
"Little is known about the long-term emotional and physical consequences of childhood trauma and whether it poses greater long-term health risks than other types of stressors," says study leader Viola Vaccarino, MD, PhD, professor of medicine (cardiology) at Emory University School of Medicine and professor of epidemiology at Emory's Rollins School of Public Health.
"Trauma occurring earlier in life is particularly harmful because it may disrupt the development of adaptive responses to stress. Future research on stress and disease should focus on early life stress," says Dr. Vaccarino.
According to the study results, twins in the highest quartile of the Early Trauma Inventory were twice as likely to have major depressive disorder than other twins. Of the childhood traumas, emotional trauma was the most strongly associated with major depressive disorder.Tobacco is an anti-depressant. So is cannabis.
Study participants with childhood trauma were also more likely to be exposed to trauma as adults and to develop post traumatic stress disorder. After adjusting for smoking, twins in the highest group on the inventory were two to three times more likely to have a previous diagnosis of coronary heart disease, including previous myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and hospitalizations for coronary heart disease.
In contrast, no significant associations were found for adult general trauma and combat trauma with either major depressive disorder or coronary heart disease, notes Dr. Vaccarino.
We are wasting untold billions every year fighting drugs when we should be dealing with the root cause - child abuse.
Cross Posted at Power and Control and at Classical Values
5 comments:
fascinating. but...
why don't all all formerly abused folks use illegal drugs?
why aren't all all addicts depressed?
what about the many depressed people who were never abused?
IOW: it seems to me that your conclusion doesn't follow from the hypothesis.
SURE::: LET'S DEFINITELY END CHILD ABUSE.
But many of these abusers are drug and alcohol abusers - will they magically become better citizens as soon as we make it LEGAL!?
Will addicts be better truck drivers and teacher and wives and because the substance they abuse is legal?
I don't think so.
Addicts cannot be trusted in part because of their addiction, and not the fact that their addiction is the result of depression or childhood trauma or whether the substance is legal.
prohibition doesn't make addiction more likely. NOBODY HAS HIS ARM TWISTED BY A DEALER.
it's a voluntary action. a choice. a bad one. one that shows bad judgment.
and the people who traffic in it are bad people too.
if "big tobacco" is bad, then "big illegal drug runners" are worse. and they don't become better just because we can tax what they sell and it's price is lower because of free market competition.
at least that's what i think right now.
milton friedman agreed with you!
all the best!
i guess the short version of what i'm arguing is that...
just because an addict is attracted to drugs because of their effect on his depression...
doesn't mean we should legalize drugs.
that's non sequitor.
we need to get these people on REAL good mo'better anti-depressants.
Dismissing the original point by stating "SURE::: LET'S DEFINITELY END CHILD ABUSE" and then going off on a tangent about how legalization is not the answer is truly missing the point.
Which was...
Ending child abuse will end much more drug abuse than our current efforts do.
i'm for world peace and ending poverty too.
my point: ending child abuse will never happen. or not for eons.
utopianistic and simplistic "cures" are IDIOTIC.
anyway... why not just wait - then - and legalize drugs AFTER you have eliminated all child abuse!?!?
first things first.
i agree that addicts should get medical help and many might benefit from anti-depressants.
and therefore the ones who would benefit from anti-depressants SHOULD NOT get to stay on legalized street drugs. they should get true medication with a prescription - which they pay for themselves.
the public - the taxpayers - should not have to pay for the lifestyle choices/mistakes of others.
these formerly abused kids could go to doctors and shrinks and get legal treatment; they do not have to take crank or heroine.
ALSO (here's another tangent for you to go off on!): the us taxpayers should not be paying for medical treatment of AIDS in Africa: aids is a sexually transmitted disease: an STD; we should no more pay for the treatment of aids than for syphllis.
maybe we should help pay for the kids who get it in the womb.
but no one else.
and i don't care if the AIDS patient got it from sex or drugs. it's their choice.
your turn...
Well, which is it then- do you definitely want to end child abuse, or is it idiotic to try?
Everybody agrees that child abuse, war, poverty, AIDS, etc. are problems. All I see you saying is that you don't want to try to fix them. That kind of attitude lasts until you end up destroyed by one of those problems.
Are you saying that we shouldn't support the results of sexual transmissions? Every one of us is a result of sexual transmissions. Some of us made out better than others- it is elitist to think that a good set of genes or parents entitles you to better care or opportunity.
But I digress; the point was (revised) Reducing child abuse will reduce much more drug abuse than our current efforts do.
Post a Comment