TOTAL PROOF: GINGRICH IS A RINO (UPDATED/EXPANDED/BUMPED)

MITT NEVER DID A COMMERCIAL WITH KENNEDY OR TIP O'NEILL OR KERRY OR DUKAKIS.

HE RAN AGAINST KENNEDY AND HAS BEEN MORE CONSISTENTLY MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN NEWT IN HIS PUBLIC LIFE FOR THE LAST DECADE -

AND IN HIS PRIVATE LIFE FOR SEVERAL DECADES!

BUT NEWT MADE ONE WITH PELOSI:

 

A VOTE FOR NEWT IS A VOTE FOR A RINO.

AN ERRATIC, MERCURIAL, EGOMANIACAL RINO.

WHO IN RECENTLY TRASHED PAUL RYAN AND ENDORSED DEDE SCOZZAFAVA.

DON'T BE DUPED. DON'T FALL FOR THE RED MEAT THEATRICALITY.

VOTE MITT.

UPDATE: WASHINGTON EXAMINER: 

"Gingrich, the supposedly conservative choice, 

isn't reliably conservative"

HERE ARE SOME POSSIBLE RUNNING MATES FOR NEWT

GINGRICH-SCOZZAFAVA

GINGRICH-SHARPTON

GINGRICH-PELOSI

GINGRICH-ARAFAT

UPDATE: OVER AT PJM, THEY ASKED READERS WHO MIGHT BE THE BEST VEEP FOR NEWT: HERE IS ONE OF THE COMMENTS:

2. Frank Martin

I’d pay good money to watch Newt Gingrich debate Newt Gingrich. I’d even pay to watch the next day after the Gingrich v. Gingrich debate when Newt Gingrich complain about Newt Gingrich and how he really won the debate and how “frankly he’s disappointed” that we could see it any other way.

Sidebar: You know what cracks me up about South Carolina? It’s how the guy who has always dogged by a slander of polygamy was just beat by a guy who actually had three wives. Not all at once of course, but what was once an automatic disqualification has now become a career advancement and a way to get your message out by having your ex-wife campaign against you. End Sidebar

Now to your question,”Who would be Newt Gingrich’s VP?”

I believe we can apply the following filter to that problem:

1. Cant be anyone he’s ever worked with or knows him personally(no one in this category will return his calls today.)
2. Cant be anyone who actually wants to accomplish anything in politics.
3. Cant be anyone with a sense of personal shame.
4. Cant be anyone with anything else to do or desire to do anything ever again.

There is one man who fits this filter, but Vice President Biden has already pledged himself to the Obama campaign.

...
ANOTHER UPDATE: A COMMENTER AT GATEWAY PUNDIT:

 #31 January 22, 2012 at 12:49 pmJames commented:Romney has my vote because he is the most conservative nominee. Newt can take his global warming, amnesty for illegals and 1.6 million from fannie mae and go sit on a couch with nancy pelosi and scozafalla.

NEWT'S STRATEGERY: MISDIRECTION

INSTEAD OF DEALING WITH THE FACTS - THAT HE IS A SERIAL ADULTERER - WHO WAS REVILED BY HIS FELLOW GOP CONGRESSMEN AND FINED $300,000 BY THEM FOR ETHICAL VIOLATIONS - NEWT ATTACKS THE MEDIA AND OBAMA.

DON'T BE DUPED:

Marianne Gingrich, to whom Gingrich was married when he began an affair with his current wife, Callista, had been in the news all day as excerpts of a then soon-to-be-released interview with ABC News were replayed dozens of times. By debate time, the words "open marriage," a stale phrase from the silly Seventies when Gingrich was a bespectacled college professor with mutton-chop sideburns, were on the tips of the tongues of a million wags.Just as King had no choice but to ask, Gingrich answered in the only way he could — by attacking the questioner. Shooting the messenger is a time-honored method of spin control among royals and their imitators. Gingrich's bilious reproach was an oratorical defenestration. King's audacity was "despicable," he intoned, and the crowd roared.Suddenly, Gingrich's questionable past was forgotten and whatever ire his record might have inspired was redirected at The Media — that monolithic target of communal contempt. Not only did Gingrich deflect attention from his immediate problem but he managed to win the public's heart.

WHO IS MORE OF A RINO, MITT OR NEWT?

LET'S LOOK AT THE RECORD:

• MITT NEVER DID A TV COMMERCIAL WITH ANY DEM, BUT NEWT DID ONE WITH PELOSI SUPPORTING GLOBAL WARMING.

• MITT RAN AGAINST TEDDY JO KENNEDY.

• MITT NEVER PLAYED FOOTSY WITH AL SHARPTON, BUT NEWT DID - STILL DOES.

• MITT DIDN'T ENDORSE SCOZZAFAVA, NEWT DID.

• MITT WAS AMONG THE VERY FIRST TO ENDORSE RUBIO; NEWT WASN'T.

• MITT WAS AMONG THE FIRST TO ENDORSE AYOTTE, BUT NEWT WASN'T.

• MITT MADE MANY CAMPAIGN APPEARANCES WITH PALIN IN 2008, BUT NEWT DIDN'T.

• MITT NEVER WORKED FOR FREDDIE MAC, BUT NEWT DID.

• MITT NEVER WAS A LOBBYIST, BUT NEWT WAS.

• MITT NEVER ATTACKED THE FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM , CAPITALISM, OR PEOPLE WHO WORKED HARD AND BECAME SELF-MADE MILLIONAIRES, BUT NEWT HAS.

• NEWT IS MORE OF A RINO THAN MITT.

THERE ARE MORE REASONS MITT WOULD MAKE A FINE CONSERVATIVE STANDARD-BEARER AND A BETTER CANDIDATE TO DEFEAT OBAMA:

• MITT IS PRO-LIFE, PRO-TAX CUTS, PRO-SPENDING CUTS, ANTI-DEFENSE CUTS, AN UNAMBIGUOUS SUPPORTER OF ISRAEL AND HAS PROMISED TO REPEAL OBAMACARE AND DODD-FRANK.

• THE FACT THAT MITT PASSED A STATE HEALTHCARE REFORM MEANS THE LEFT CAN'T USE MEDISCARE AND HE CANNOT BE TARRED AS AN UN-CARING RETHUGLICAN WHO WANTS TO KEEP POOR PEOPLE FROM GETTING HEALTHCARE.

• ON TOP OF THAT, THE ETHICALLY CHALLENGED SERIAL ADULTERER'S NEGATIVES ARE HORRENDOUSLY HIGH AND HE CANNOT BEAT OBAMA.

MITT IS NO ADULTERER, NO APPEASER AND NO RINO.

YOU CAN'T SAY THAT NEWT. HE IS A SERIAL ADULTERER WHO APPEASED PELOSI AND SHARPTON AND ARAFAT AND WORKED FOR FREDDIE MAC AND LOBBIED FOR OTHERS.

NEWT IS MORE OF A RINO THAN MITT. HE'S A WELL KNOWN QUANTITY BY THE ELECTORATE AND THEY DON'T LIKE HIM.

NEWT WOULD LOSE AGAINST OBAMA.

SUNUNU IS CORRECT:

 

NEWT'S NEGATIVES ARE STUNNING

CHUDI:

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/america-hates-newt-gingrich/326161  

Not every poll releases their full results, so here are the most recent favorability results I could find for Obama, Romney, and Newt. 

Fox News, 1/12-1/14:
Obama, fav/unfav, 51%/46%, +5
Romney, fav/unfav, 45%/38%, +7
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 27%/56%, -29  

CBS/NYT, 1/12-1/17:
Obama, fav/unfav, 38%/45%, -7
Romney, fav/unfav, 21%/35%, -14
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 17%/49%, -32 

PPP, 1/13-1/17:
Obama, app/dis, 47%/50%, -3
Romney, fav/unfav, 35%/53%, -18
Gingrich, fav/unfav, 26%/60%, -34 

GINGRICH HAS WORSE NEGATIVES THAN HILLARY AND PALIN.

HE IS UNELECTABLE.

---

I THINK THE TRULY MOST IMPORTANT DAMAGING MOMENT OF THE NIGHT CAME WHEN RICK SANTORUM EXPLAINED HOW NEWT WAS A LOUSY LEADER WHEN HE WAS SPEAKER.


THIS COMPLETELY CORROBORATED SUSAN MOLINARI'S DESCRIPTION OF NEWT  - ONE WHICH MANY ON THE EXTREME RIGHT POOH-POOHED ON THE BASIS OF THE FACT THAT MOLINARI IS A MODERATE  REPUBLICAN.


SANTORUM IS NOT A MODERATE AND HE AGREES: 


NEWT IS A LOUSY LEADER WHO  IS UNRELIABLE, ERRATIC AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED WITH THE OVAL OFFICE.






 HERE'S RICK CORROBORATING MOLINARI: SANTORUM: 

I will give Newt Gingrich his due on grandiose ideas and grandiose projects. I will not give him his -- his -- his due on executing those projects, which is exactly what the president of the United States is supposed to do. Four years into his speakership, he was thrown out by the conservatives. It was a coup against him in three. I served with him. I was there. I knew what the problems were going on in the House of Representatives when Newt Gingrich was leading this -- leading there. It was an idea a minute, no discipline, no ability to be able to pull things together.

HERE'S ROMNEY'S RESPONSE - WHICH IS THINK WAS GREAT: 

 KING: Governor Romney, you're raising your hand to come in the conversation. I want to let you in on the conversation, but also, as I do, you put an ad on the air paid by your campaign, not one of the super PAC ads, calling the Speaker an unreliable leader. Why?

 ROMNEY:

Well, let me go back and address first what you just heard. What you've listened to, in my view, and the Speaker's rendition of history going back to 1978 and his involvement in Washington, is, in my view, a perfect example of why we need to send to Washington someone who has not lived in Washington, but someone who's lived in the real streets of America, working in the private sector, who's led a business, who started a business, who helped lead the Olympics, who helped lead a state. We need to have someone outside Washington go to Washington. If we want people who spent their life and their career, most of their career, in Washington, we have three people on the stage -- well, I take that back. We've got a doctor down here who spent most of his time in the surgical suite -- well not surgery, in the birthing suite. (APPLAUSE) ROMNEY: But I think America has to make a choice as to whether we're going to send people who spent their life in Washington go represent our country or, instead, whether we're going to lead -- have someone who goes who's been a leader in the private sector and knows how the economy works at the grassroots level

FLORIDIANS: VOTE MITT - THE RELIABLE CONSERVATIVE YOU CAN TRUST.