First off there's this: why did his mother go to Chicago to become an au pair for the summer of 1960 (we know this was when she went from a passage in Obama's memoir) - her family's first summer in Hawaii? Her family was from Kansas and Washington state - with no known connections to Chicago at all. Why would her parents allow her to go there. Certainly not to work for some unknown family in some unknown neighborhood.
FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS WAS FROM CHICAGO - AND DAVIS'S WHITE WIFE WAS FROM A RICH CHICAGO FAMILY.
Perhaps the Davises made the connection. While in Chicago, Davis was connected to the Jarrett's and the Ayers. Maybe young Stanley Ann Dunham even babysat for young Billy Ayers - he would have been about 10 or 11.
That would mean that the Dunham's and the Davis's were friends YEARS before the "official version" which claims that Davis was a poker playing buddy of the old man Stanley Dunham - but they're hardly birds of a feather - except for their left-wing politics.
Second: There's very suggestive evidence that Mr. and Mrs. Davis were VERY friendly with the young Stanley Ann Dunham - and by very I do mean SEXUALLY CLOSE: in his memoir, Frank Davis wrote, there's an episode in which he describes a three-some he and his wife had with a 14 year old white virgin named... ANN, of all things. Seems to me this could have very well been Stanley ANN Dunham in real life.
Third: Obama looks more like Frank Davis and Frank's son Mark Davis than he looks like Barack Senior or any member of the Obama clan - and I do mean clan - over there in Kenya. In my opinion, Obama Jr. has a family resemblance to the Davis's as much as to the Dunham's but none whatsoever to the Obama's in Kenya.
Fourth: Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetero decided to leave Barack Jr. in Hawaii and return alone to SE Asia. She left him with her parents and under the tutelage of Frank Davis - ostensibly to provide young Barry with a good black male role model. But perhaps the REAL reason she felt so secure about ABANDONING her son, was that she was depositing him with his real/biological father?
Fifth: As a teen, Obama wrote a poem - which was published at the time - about Frank Davis. Barry Obama Jr. titled his poem about Frank Davis "POP".
Sixth: Barack's first job was in Chicago. A place he ostensibly has no other connection to besides the fact that his mother was an au pair there (with a rich family that nobody seems to be willing to identify). What's key here is that Obama Jr has told 2 different accounts of how he got this job (one in his book and another to a graduating class at Wesleyan), and the guy who hired him - Kellman - has 2 completely different takes on it (one he told a reporter and one he told at the nominating convention in Denver). THAT'S RIGHT: THERE ARE 4 VERSIONS FROM THE 2 PRINCIPAL PLAYERS. That's odd - unless they are lying; (it's easy to tell the same story over and over again when it's the truth and you've got nothing to hide). Kellman was a protege of Alinsky who was a Chicago comrade of Frank Marshall Davis. Obama and Kellman want to hide this fact, this connection.
Seventh: Obama got into Harvard Law School with references from Percy Sutton who was connected to Malcolm X who was connected to Chicago through the Nation of Islam. Also helping young Obama was a big-time Nation of Islam member from Texas - a place Obama had never ever been. How did young Obama get these references, who was his connection? I'd guess it had to be someone with very strong Chicago connections. DAVIS, again.
Eighth: When Obama graduated from Harvard Law he didn't get a prestigious job at some big Boston or New York or Hawaii law firm or clerk with a big-time federal judge. He could have easily done any of those as the first black Harvard Law Review Editor. He chose instead to work for an extremely politically connected law firm in CHICAGO, of all places. A law firm that did work for REZKO and employed his future wife - the daughter of a CHICAGO MACHINE ALDERMAN. In the Chicago Machine, in order to GET IN THE DOOR, you first have to answer a question: "WHO SENT YOU?" You cannot get in unless someone with connections sent you. UPDATE: Valerie Jarrett worked at the law firm too - and Her father in law was a buddy of... FRANK DAVIS. (Her mom was pals with Tom Ayers = Bill Ayers father. OH: she was born in... Tehran.) (ASIDE: maybe Stanley Ann baby sat for her?!)
SO WHO SENT OBAMA?
The ONLY person who answers ALL of these points and makes ALL of the connections for Barack Obama Junior is FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS.
Only Davis connects all the dots and could have connected Obama to the Ayers and the Jarretts and the Nation of Islam and Kellman and EVERYTHING ELSE.
Frank Marshall Davis didn't do this for everyone - or anyone else. He did it for his first son. The son he expected to fulfill all of HIS DREAMS.
YUP: The REAL FATHER in the title Dreams From My Father is Frank Marshall Davis.
(And I think the REAL AUTHOR of Dreams - Bill Ayers - knows ALL OF THIS. And that the title Ayers chose is an inside joke. I know that Obama was contacted by literary agent Jane Dystel after winning the election to become head of the Harvard Law Review. I know he failed for years to produce a decent manuscript. I think those who argue Ayers is the real author are correct).
Ninth: Neil Abercrombie is the new left-wing Governor of Hawaii. He PROMISED he would put all the "birther" lies to rest by releasing Obama's REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE as soon as he became governor. Now, he is singing a different tune: he says he cannot release it unless Barack Junior allows it to be released - and Barack Junior is NOT allowing it to be released.
WHY WON'T BARACK JUNIOR RELEASE THE ACTUAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE? WHAT IS HE HIDING?
Tenth: Officials have seen the actual birth certificate and said that nothing in it DISQUALIFIES OBAMA FROM SERVING AS POTUS.
I believe them.
I think what Obama is hiding isn't something that disqualifies him from being POTUS, and that he is a USA citizen.
I believe he is hiding something politically EXPLOSIVE: the fact that his father is Frank Marshall Davis and that he has lived a mendacious charade his whole life and that he was raised and tutored and prepped for a career in politics by the most radical leftists and the most corrupt political machine in the country. They raised him and trained him and bankrolled him and they got him elected Senator and president and they run his White House via Rahm, the Daleys and Jarrett.
He's the Manchurian Candidate spawned by Frank Marshall Davis, trained by Alinsky and his acolytes, and bankrolled and controlled by the Chicago Machine. And Soros.
[BTW:
THIS ALSO EXPLAINS WHY TEDDY KENNEDY AND CAROLINE ENDORSED HIM SO EARLY ON:
THE KENNEDY CLAN HAS BEEN A PART OF THE CHICAGO MACHINE SINCE JOE SENIOR'S DAYS IN CHICAGO AS A BOOTLEGGER AND AS OWNER OF THE CHICAGO MART.
AND ANOTHER THING:
EVEN JOE BIDEN OWES HIS POLITICAL LIFE TO THE CHICAGO MACHINE.
OBAMA GOT IN WITH THIS CROWD VIA HIS REAL FATHER: FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS]
ALL THIS CAN BE DISPROVED BY TAKING A DNA TEST.
By comparing Obama Junior's DNA to that of Mark Davis (his half brother) and any Obama "half-brother" from Kenya we can prove who his father really was.
I doubt Barry Junior will agree.
He has too much to hide.
All you have to do to see links for every fact in this post is click here and read every previous post.
UPDATE: HERE'S SOME MORE:
9. COMMUNIST FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS: OBAMA'S ULTIMATE CHICAGO CONNECTIONEVERYTHING YOU EVER WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA SOETERO JUNIOR, STANLEY ANN DUNHAM AND FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS BUT WERE AFRAID TO ASK
10. HMMM... OBAMA'S 1ST TRIP TO KENYA.
11. UPDATED: WHY AND WHEN DID OBAMA REALLY GAIN HIS CONNECTION TO CHICAGO AND THE CHICAGO MACHINE?
UPDATE #2: THIS HAS AUDIO.
Update: more here.
Hi.
ReplyDeleteI don't remember if it was here that i saw a facial comparisation between Obama junior and senior and frank Davis senior and junior the resemblance was positive in the Davis case.
Basing speculation on other speculation is an exercise in futility. Basing speculation on verifiable fact is more credible.
ReplyDelete1. "Perhaps the Davises made the connection" is unsubstantiated speculation.
2. Davis wrote a novel involving a Jamaican girl named Anne before WWII, not a white girl named Ann twenty years later.
3. Interesting opinion.
4. "She left him with her parents and under to tutelage of Frank Davis." Not sure what you mean by this There is no evidence that Obama's mother knew of Davis.
5. There is no evidence that "Pop" was about Davis, and actual evidence to the contrary: In "Pop," the poet pulls out a mirror that he had been saving from under his chair. Unless you believe Obama kept a mirror under a chair at Frank's, this did not occur at Frank's.
6-8. These contain no evidence that Frank is his father, only speculation that there was some connnection.
9. Obama is under no obligation to reveal his "real" B.C. Perhaps he is just hiding his privacy.
10. Whether the "real" B.C. lists Obama Sr. as father, or whether it lists someone else as father, is a moot point for eligibility. Being born here makes him a natural born citizen regardless of parentage. Unwillingness to reveal this private document, when he is under no obligation to do so, proves little.
"Truth is generally the best vindication against slander."
- Abraham Lincoln
mark davis. hi.
ReplyDeletesheesh; you are more defensive than ever.
sorry. but i guess you feel like you are just defending your father and that is admirable.
SHEESH:
look at the post title: why it's reasonable to DOUBT...
i don't say i've proven anything.
it's obvious i am SPECULATING but based on certain FACTS:
FACT: your father wrote he and your mother had a threesome with a 14 year old white virgiun named ANN.
FACTS: barack junior's mother was about 15 when she moved to hawaii and was white and her middle name was ANN.
FACT: there is no known connection between the dunham's and chicago in 1960 and no one will ADMIT who she aupaired for.
SPECULATION: she aupaired for someone via the davis's - the couple she had sex with.
FACT: barack junior and kellman have told 4 different versions of how they met and started working together.
SPECULATION: They are LYING - people telling the truth tell the same story over and over and have nothing to hide.
FACT: barack junior looks more like YOU and YOUR FATHER (and his grandfather stanley) than any of barack SENIOR'S other sons in kenya.
FACT: barack junior made a meteoric rise in chicago machine something you cannot do without connections to the machine. these connections pre-date his working at the law firm where he met michelle.
FACT: the dunham's had NO connections to the chicago machine.
FACT: barack junior called a poem about frank marshall davis POP - which is a word that measn FATHER.
FACT: barack junior used chicago connections to get into harvard law.
FACE THE FACTS MARK:
your father connects ALL THE DOTS.
and only your father does.
SPECULATING that your father is barack junior's father passes Occam's Razor: its the simplest way to explain all the unexplained.
AND THE ONLY SIMPLE WAY TO DO IT.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN:
"YOU CAN FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL OF THE TIME, AND ALL OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME, BUT YOU CANNOT FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE ALL OF THE TIME."
RELIPUNDIT:
"People who have nothing to hide don't hide anything."
OBAMA IS HIDING A SHI*LOAD: besides his real birth certificate:
* HIS MEDICAL REPORTS
* AND HIS COLLEGE APPLICATIONS AND RECORDS
* AND HIS LAW SCHOOL APPLICATION AND RECORDS
* AND HIS STATE SENATE RECORDS
* AND HIS LAW FIRM RECORDS)-
more here:
http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/search?q=obama+hiding
YOU WROTE: "FACT: your father wrote he and your mother had a threesome with a 14 year old white virgiun named ANN"
ReplyDeleteRESPONSE Sorry, but this is NOT a "fact." Davis NEVER wrote that he and my mother had a threesome with Ann. He wrote that character Bob Greene had this encounter with his FIRST wife before WWII. My parents did not meet until after Pearl Harbor.
That accusation is a hoax, and suggests you have been misinformed. Davis wrote a semi-autobiographical NOVEL. You may not be aware of this, but a novel is a work of FICTION! In this regard, Davis's book is like Samuel Clemens "Roughing It," in that they were both written under pseudonyms that were also fictional characters in their stories:
"Samuel Clemens wrote autobiographical novels under the pseudonym "Mark Twain," including "Roughing It," which "follows the travels of young Mark Twain through the Wild West during the years 1861–1867. After a brief stint as a Confederate cavalry militiaman, he joined his brother Orion Clemens, who had been appointed Secretary of the Nevada Territory, on a stagecoach journey west. Twain consulted his brother's diary to refresh his memory and borrowed heavily from his active imagination for many stories in the novel." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roughing_It)
In both cases authors used pseudonyms to publish autobiographical novels that were "fictionalized but still based upon actual occurrences." In both cases these novels presented fictionalized adventures of their pseudonymous characters. Does anyone claim that the adventures of "Mark Twain" literally occurred in the life of Samuel Clemens, because "Mark Twain" said they happened? If not, then why should anyone claim that the adventures of Bob Greene literally occurred in the life of Frank Marshall Davis, because "Bob Greene" said they happened? Fair weather principles indicate bias.
You will find that contrary to fairy tales drifting around the blogosphere, Davis never "admitted" that any of the events from his novel actually happened in real life. You will find that critics are trying to railroad Davis with trumped-up evidence, just like Mike Nifong tried to railroad the Duke lacrosse team, Andrew Brietbart tried to railroad Shirley Sherrod, and Dr. Hatfill was railroaded in the anthrax letters case.
The issue is rather simple: Either you literally attribute fictional characters' stories to their authors' real lives, or you accept that fictional characters' stories are fiction. By definition, even semi-autobiographical novels are fictionalized accounts of their authors' own lives. Research should reveal that ALL fictional narrators of such novels claim the events are true, although their actual authors make no such claims!
"Truth is generally the best vindication against slander."
- Abraham Lincoln
Wow, this is explosive and VERY well researched, new stuff I didn't even know. This really rings true, and I believe is the REAL reason he hids the BC and all his other stuff. The title of the book is a funny joke and poke in the eye to America. Connecting the dots, it all adds up. Wow. Did you send this to Drudge, or Glenn Beck or Breitbart of anyone that could give it a much wider reading? I wish people would see all these facts and wake up.
ReplyDeleteabe lincoln: you cant fool all the people all the time.
ReplyDeletebtw:
ReplyDeleteclemens real auto-bio via his posthumous writings just published proves he was a petty extremely mortal man of many personal flaws with vehement hatreds only hinted at in his novels.
MORE IMPORTANTLY:
what was you mother's maiden name, mark?
AND WILL YOU SUBMIT DNA FOR A TEST?
I have only one nit to pick, and that is with Item 10. Officials have seen the actual birth certificate and said that nothing in it DISQUALIFIES OBAMA FROM SERVING AS POTUS.
ReplyDeleteTwo points.
1. I've read that they didn't actually say that. I've read that they looked at his "birth records." If he has a "born at home" type birth certificate, that proves nothing.
2. Who can say that any of those Hawaiian officials understand what Article II "Natural Born Citizen." Means? They are probably operating on the common misconception that 14th Amendment Citizenship grants "Natural Born" Status just by being born on American soil. Those who've researched this realize that "Natural Born Citizen" status REQUIRES an American Mother and Father.
I wouldn't consider item 10 as established without further information.
item 10 relates that the becasue obama won't release it, the birth certificate MUST BE significant.
ReplyDeleteu n i just disagree as to why.
Have a look:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVDI0wpyb68&feature=related
My mother's maiden name is Helen Canfield Peck. I previously indicated that I would be willing to take a blood test, but not at my own expense.
ReplyDelete"Those who've researched this realize that "Natural Born Citizen" status REQUIRES an American Mother and Father"? Really? Not according to the leading legal dictionary:
"Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition
Those who try to redefine "natural born citizen" for their own agenda are no better than those who try to redefine "torture" (e.g., waterboarding) for their own agenda.
Such rhetorical deception was highlighted in the story of Alice's adventures in "Through The Looking-Glass,"
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone. "It means just what I choose it to mean - neither more or less."
"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master - that's all."
- Lewis Carroll, English author & recreational mathematician (1832 - 1898)
Fortunately, the Rule of Law supersedes the Rule of Man in civilized societies
BTW: Supreme Court case of Perkins v. Elg, states that minors cannot, as a result of actions of their parents, lose U.S. citizenship obtained at birth.
as always thx 4 ur thoughtful comment
ReplyDeletefmd is the earliest connection between anyone in obama's exteneded family and chicago.
ReplyDeletewould fmd have reached out and connected barry junior to these network if barry junior was merely the grandson of a poker buddy???
doubtful.
also:
h canfield-peck might be a relation of ayers. maybe even a first or second cousin.
and, she was a trust fund baby from libertyville.
what else can you tell us mark?
BTW: You may be interested in Professor Paul Kengor's National Review article regarding my father. Professor Kengor is digging his own academic grave with fraudulent research, as revealed in comments at http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/248877/obama%E2%80%99s-communist-mentor-paul-kengor?page=1
ReplyDelete"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them."
- Galileo Galilei (1564 - 1642)
fmd is the dunham's earliest and best connection to the chicago machine and the robeson/ayers/jarret/boudin/left-wing crowd.
ReplyDeletethe circumstantial evidence is overwhelming.
i grew up in a nyc sub-division of this crowd.
i know the network exists.
i will prove this network created obama. and that fmd was deeply involved.
if not as father, then still as the centerpiece.
Natural Born Citizen Defined.
ReplyDeleteFirst we have to take into consideration the historical context of the meaning at that time. Alexander Hamilton who was a key figure in the creation of the declaration of independence and who was also influenced by the author Emmerich de Vattel framed the constitution around The Laws of Nations, a book by Vattel. The Supreme Court has also ruled on the definition of natural Born Citizen in Minor vs. Happersett, 88 US 162 (1875) as follows:
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.“ (Emphasis added.)
The Historical Record:
"We know from the historical record and from the way the Constitution is framed that the Founders relied heavily upon Emmerich de Vattel and his highly acclaimed treatise, The Law of Nations or Principles of the Law of Nature (1758), as a crucial and fundamental guide in knowing what the law of nations was. Alexander Hamilton was the key organizer of the movement to hold the Constitutional Convention that produced the Constitution. No one played a more important role than Hamilton in the adoption of the Constitution. Of all the Founders, he was the one most influenced by Vattel. http://east_west_dialogue.tripod.com/vattel/id5.html. In 1784, Hamilton, as the lawyer for the defense, arguing in the case of Rutgers v. Waddington, quoted prolifically from E. Vattel’s, The Law of Nations."
Natural Born Citizen Continued....
ReplyDelete"Vattel, in his masterpiece legal treatise, The Law of Nations or Principles of the Law of Nature, in Book I, Chapter XIX, analyzed citizenship and related topics. The Founders knew that Vattel defined a "citizen" simply as any member of society. They also knew from reading Vattel that a "natural born Citizen" had a different standard from just “citizen,” for he or she was a child born in the country to two citizen parents (Vattel, Section 212 in original French and English translation). That is the definition of a "natural born Citizen," as recognized by numerous U.S. Supreme Court and lower court decisions (The Venus, 12U.S. 253(1814), Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242 (1830), Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856), Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) , Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F. Cas. 582 (C.C.W.D. Ark 1879), United States v. Ward, 42 F. 320 (1890); Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), Ludlam, Excutrix, & c., v. Ludlam, 26 N.Y. 356 (1863) and more) and the framers of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the 14th Amendment, the Naturalization Act of 1795, 1798, 1802, 1885, and our modern 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401. It should be noted that during the Founding and throughout American history, there has always been a distinction between a general “citizen” on the one hand and a “natural born citizen” on the other. The law of nations did not make any specific requirements for one to be a “citizen” of a nation, for such a person was basically just a member of the civil society. Before and after the revolution, the Founders considered anyone who resided in the colonies or States and who adhered to the revolutionary cause to be a “citizen,” regardless of place of birth or condition of the parents. But the law of nations did provide for a strict definition of a “natural born citizen,” i.e., a child born in the country of citizen parents. And the Founders also adopted that stricter definition for an Article II “natural born Citizen” which applied only to one wanting to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military."
http://www.federaljack.com/?p=174448
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/law-of-nations-and-not-english-common.html
http://serr8d.blogspot.com/2011/10/justiagate-fraudulent-scrubbing-of.html
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/21/us-supreme-court-precedent-states-that-obama-is-not-eligible-to-be-president/
HOW-TO INSTRUCTIONS
ReplyDeletewith video :
HOW YOU CAN PROVE TO YOURSELF AND OTHERS THAT BARACK OBAMA HAS LIED ABOUT HIS PAST AND IS ACTUALLY THE SON OF FBI-RECORDED COMMUNIST ACTIVIST
FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS
Any copyrighted material used on this blog/site used via the Fair Use Act.
For educational purposes only. Non-and Not-for profit
http://www.evidencevault.blogspot.com/