Friday, February 08, 2008

WHAT IF WE'D LISTENED TO OBAMA OR HILLARY ON IRAQ?

If we'd listened to Obama - and NOT attacked Iraq, then Saddam would still be in power, still be sending money to jihado-terrorist, still be sending payola to get under-the-table deals within the CORRUPT oil-for-food program, and using to money for his own aggrandizement, and tens of thousands of Shias would have been murdered by his regime - every year. And in all likelihood Russia and France would have scuttled the UN Sanctions and inspections and Saddam would have then been able to restart his WMD program WHICH EVERYONE SAYS HE INTENDED TO DO THE MOMENT W LEFT HIM ALONE. As Obama wanted us to do.

This instead of overthrowing a genocidal tyrant and fighting to establish a democracy within the Middle East - and killing TENS OF THOUSANDS OF JIHADO-TERRORISTS along the way.

Obama, and his followers, seem to think that the world would be a better place if Saddam was alive, in power and killing tens of thousands of Shias, RATHER THAN Saddam .... DEAD and tens of thousands of JIHADISTS KILLED.

WOW. Whose side are they on!?

Hillary's position is NOT MUCH BETTER: she'd just have had us RETREAT instead of SURGE; she'd have had us SURRENDER IRAQ TO AL QAEDA, RATHER THAN HELP OUR NEW ALLIES DEFEAT THEM. As we are.

By their I oft repeated Iraq War policies ALONE, Obama and Hillary PROVE themselves UNFIT FOR THE OFFICE.

No comments:

Post a Comment