THE LIBERAL JUDGE WHO DECIDED THE NSA CASE FAILED TO DISCLOSE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST

When the ACLU shopped for a judge, they shopped a little too close to home; JUDICIAL WATCH/via GATEWAY PUNDIT:

Judicial Watch discovered the potential conflict of interest after reviewing Judge Diggs Taylor’s financial disclosure statements, available on Judicial Watch’s Internet Site, www.judicialwatch.org.

According to her 2003 and 2004 financial disclosure statements, Judge Diggs Taylor served as Secretary and Trustee for the Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan (CFSEM). She was reelected to this position in June 2005. The official CFSEM website states that the foundation made a “recent grant” of $45,000 over two years to the ACLU of Michigan, a plaintiff in the wiretapping case. Judge Diggs Taylor sided with the ACLU of Michigan in her recent decision.
...
(Judge Diggs Taylor is also the presiding judge in another case where she may have a conflict of interest. The Arab Community Center for Social and Economic Services (ACCESS) is a defendant in another case now before Judge Diggs Taylor’s court [Case No. 06-10968 (Mich. E.D.)]. In 2003, the CFSEM donated $180,000 to ACCESS.)

Like her first husband, Judge Diggs Taylor is morally challenged. (The judge's second husband wasn't a convicted liberal Democrat politician; he was merely a liberal Democrat hack politican.)