Tuesday, September 14, 2010

A VOTE FOR CHRISTINE O'DONNELL IS A VOTE FOR NED LAMONT

The USA is better off because Joe Lieberman is in the US Senate.

Although he is a liberal on nearly all social issues, he can be counted on as far as national security policy and many fiscal issues.

Lieberman is infinitely better than Ned Lamont would've been - and Lamont would've been elected had not Joe sought and won election as an independent.

It is better to have a liberal you can count on on the most important issues, than a liberal you cannot count on at all.

The same is true of Castle: he is better than the Democrat alternative.

And only he can win the general - and beat Delanware's Democrat nominee.

That's why - in a way - a vote for Christine O'Donnell is a vote for Ned Lamont.

COMPLETE ROUND UP HERE.

3 comments:

  1. Please! How can you masquerade as an astute blogger and say things like that. There is no parallel between a Christine ODonnell and Ned Lamont. And Connecticut would have been much better off with Lamont than with Lieberman. Now that's an astute observation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I MEANT IT WAS A WASTED VOTE.

    BUT I THINK I MIGHT HAVE BEEN WRONG.

    ReplyDelete