Sunday, March 01, 2009

BUSH VERSUS OBAMA: WHO DO THE TROOPS LOVE AND RESPECT - AND WHAT IT MIGHT THAT LEAD TO . . .





CHECK OUT THE SIDE BY SIDE VIDEOS AT GATEWAY.


  • EVEN CNN SAID THE RESPONSE OF THE TROOPS TO OBAMA WAS "TEPID".




  • BUSH ROUTINELY GOT THUNDEROUS AND WARM RECEPTIONS FROM THE TROOPS.
  • BUSH - WHO SENT THEM INTO HARM'S WAY - WAS A HERO FOR THE TROOPS,
  • A COMMANDER IN CHIEF THEY KNEW WOULD STAND BY THEM AND DEFEND THE USA AND THE FREE WORLD - WHICH IS AFTER ALL THE MISSION THEY HAD ALL VOLUNTEERED TO BE A PART OF - REGARDLESS OF THE SACRIFICE.
  • REPEAT: REGARDLESS OF THE SACRIFICE.
  • THEY KNOW THAT OBAMA IS NO SUCH LEADER, AND NOT A BONAFIDE COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
  • THIS IS IMPORTANT:
  • WITHOUT THE RESPECT OF THE TROOPS EFFECTIVE COMMAND IS IMPOSSIBLE.
  • I BELIEVE THAT THE TROOPS SENSE THAT OBAMA IS NOT ONE OF THEM, OR FOR THEM, OR FOR THEIR MISSION.
  • FOR THIS REASON, I THINK WE WILL VERY SOON SEE A HUGE DROP OFF IN ENLISTMENTS - SOMETHING THAT NEVER HAPPENED DURING THE BUSH YEARS.
  • THE TYPES OF MEN AND WOMEN WHO ARE WILLING TO SACRIFICE ALL FOR THEIR NATION AND THE FREE WORLD WILL NOT DO SO FOR A COMMANDER IN CHIEF WHO WOULD RATHER APPEASE OUR ENEMIES THAN OPPOSE THEM.
  • THEY WON'T ENLIST TO SERVE A COMMANDER THEY CANNOT RESPECT.
“The greatest leader in the world could never win a campaign unless he understood the men he had to lead.”

“Remember, a good leader is one who causes or inspires others, staff or subordinate commanders to do the job.”

––GEN Omar Bradley

“To create great armies is one thing; to lead them . . . is another.”

––Sir Winston Churchill

“A competent leader can get efficient service from poor troops; while, on the contrary, an incapable leader can demoralize the best of troops.”

––GEN John Pershing

No comments:

Post a Comment