Idiot who organized the Phoenix anti-Islam "bring your guns" rally is going into hiding, because he's brave, I guess. http://t.co/tRFoztbJTT
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
Simpletons, scoundrels and grifters are always the first ones to hide behind the First Amendment. #PhoenixMosque
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
And today's "Guy who doesn't follow me but is here to teach me that the Left has a double standard" has already shown up.
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
Does he also consider the 9-11 Families for a Safe America "idiots"? Point: they could've organized a protest against the Phoenix mosque too, just like they did at Ground Zero nearly 5 years back, and what would he be saying about people whose beloved relatives were lost? And if the Phoenix organizer's family was threatened, how come he doesn't condemn any maniacs who might've threatened the guy?
But soon after Marz wrote those crude little spews, he was challenged by a guy who wonders if he can really discern hypocrisy:
And today's "Guy who doesn't follow me but is here to teach me that the Left has a double standard" has already shown up.
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
Okay, so everybody can see ... why are you seeking me out to tell me I have Wrong Thoughts on the Internet? https://t.co/LspOJ3X7IG
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
I don't know you, you don't follow me, but you felt the need to seek me out and tell me I'm wrong. Or something. https://t.co/LspOJ3X7IG
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
I'm asking honestly here, because it happens all the time. Why reach out to a total stranger and look for argument? https://t.co/7ZMs0JjOSy
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
I'm more interested in why you responded. I'm no one to you, we have no relationship ... so why do that? https://t.co/QIzt1Yaps1
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
So a man working as a professional writer has a problem with somebody who feels he's making terrible mistakes and wants to argue why? All he's hinting is that he's uncomfy with being challenged. Then, when asked what his opinion is on the Charlie Hebdo bloodbath, his reply was:
Like a lot of things, just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do that thing. https://t.co/JgcQwKTqEW
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
Does that happen to include writing about the contents of the Koran? Point: what Marz said above could also apply to people who write about what's wrong with the ideologies. He could easily have said the same about Robert Spencer, Raymond Ibrahim, Diana West, and even all the Jyllands-Posten cartoonists who drew Muhammed cartoons back in 2005. The question is: does Marz want anybody to call a spade a spade, or not?
Surprisingly enough, when the guy tells him he reads some of his work, he acted pretty fairly:
Thanks for saying. Just baffled why people reach out at random -- to me, to you, to anyone -- mostly to argue. https://t.co/oxuoUoBat5
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
All cool. I'm always fascinated by differences in online interactions and in-person interactions. https://t.co/CgSmrOBMQ4
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
In that case, how come he didn't want to hear any arguments from GamerGate supporters, no matter how liberal or libertarian they are? He bragged some time ago about using the block option against the pro-GG crowd, and again, their politics don't seem to fascinate him. Assuming any GamerGate supporters actually did try speaking to him, because I once tried to find any who did, and didn't succeed. So I don't know what really happened.
He then says:
"Religious freedom" should include the right to show up at your place of worship without having a bunch of armed goons there.
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) May 31, 2015
Does it also include the right to go up to the Temple Mount without being attacked by Islamofascists? Say, does it even include the right to show up at your school without being antagonized by Haredi crackpots? If all he cares about are people protesting Islamofascism, then he's not being very altruistic.
No comments:
Post a Comment