... under the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, the selling ploy of a particular establishment is liable of facing legal action against bait and switch fraud if:
The advertised product is not shown or sold in agreement with the offer's precise terms
The advertised product displayed is defective or impractical for the purposed implied in the advertisement.
The advertised product is strongly criticized or lied about- either regarding the product's guarantee, credit terms, production value, service and repair availability, etc- in hopes of "upselling" to another "better" product.I THINK THIS PERFECTLY DESCRIBES HOW OBAMA AND GRUBER WROTE AND SOLD OBAMACARE.
MORE...
WIKI - BAIT AND SWITCH: Politics
In lawmaking, "caption bills" that propose minor changes in law with simplistic titles (the bait) are introduced to the legislature with the ultimate objective of substantially changing the wording (the switch) at a later date in order to try to smooth the passage of a controversial or major amendment. Rule changes are also proposed (the bait) to meet legal requirements for public notice and mandated public hearings, then different rules are proposed at a final meeting (the switch), thus bypassing the objective of public notice and public discussion on the actual rules voted upon. While legal, the political objective is to get legislation or rules passed without expected negative community review.WHEN OBAMA TOLD US WE COULD KEEP OUR HEALTHCARE INSURANCE IF WE LIKED IT, HE KNEW WE COULDN'T, SO HE COMMITTED FRAUD.
WHEN THEY SAID THERE WASN'T AN OBAMACARE TAX, BUT ONLY A MANDATE, THEY COMMITTED FRAUD.
IT IS OUTRAGEOUS AND UNCONSCIONABLE THAT WE SHOULD ALLOW A LAW PASSED BY LIES AND FRAUD TO PERSIST.
WE MUST DEMAND REPEAL.
AND WE SHOULD SEE OBAMA AND GRUBER AND EVERYONE ELSE INVOLVED IN PERPETRATING THIS FRAUD ON AMERICA PROSECUTED.
This should be part of the strategy to undo 0bama's damages to the US.
ReplyDelete