IF HATE SPEECH CAN BE BANNED OR PUNISHED - AN IDEA AND POLICY AS REPULSIVE AS IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL - THEN WHY NOT BAN THE KORAN AND ISLAM AND ARREST IMAMS THAT CALL FOR JIHAD AND SHARIA AND CLOSE DOWN THEIR MOSQUES?
WHY HAVE NO ISLAMISTS BEEN CHARGED WITH THIS CRIME?
BECAUSE THAT WOULDN'T BE POLITICALLY CORRECT.
IOW:
WHAT DEFINES "HATE SPEECH" ISN'T HATE; IT'S WHETHER OR NOT THE SPEECH CONFORMS TO WHAT'S ACCEPTABLE TO THE RULING ELITE.
AND OUIR RULING ELITES ARE DHIMMIS, SO BLUNTLY SPEAKING THE TRUTH ABOUT ISLAMISM AND CRITICIZING ISLAMISM IS CALLED HATE SPEECH.
IOW:
IN A TYRANNICAL SOCIETY THAT APPEASES ISLAM, BEING TRUTHFUL ABOUT ISLAM IS HATE SPEECH.
IOW:
TRUTH IS THE NEW HATE SPEECH.
THERE'S A REMEDY: TOSS OUT THE RULING ELITES.
DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
No comments:
Post a Comment