STATE-RUN ROMNEYCARE PROVES FEDERAL OBAMACARE IS UNNECESSARY AND ITS MANDATE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

ONE OF THE ARGUMENTS OBAMACARE'S SUPPORTERS MAKE TO PROVE OBAMACARE IS CONSTITUTIONAL IS THAT "ONLY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN ADDRESS THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM OF THE UNINSURED WHOSE COSTS MUST BE PICKED UP BY OUT-OF-STATE CITIZENS VIS A VIS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT".

ROMNEYCARE PROVES THAT STATES CAN ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM IF THEY WISH TO DO SO AND IN A MANNER OF THEIR CHOOSING - WHICH MAY EVEN INCLUDE A SO-CALLED MANDATE.

ERGO OBAMACARE'S FEDERAL MANDATE IS NOT NECESSARY AND THEREFORE EXPANDING FEDERAL POWER IS NOT NECESSARY.

I PREDICT THIS REASONING WILL BE A MAJOR REASON THE SCOTUS WILL HOLD THAT OBAMACARE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.