WHO IS MORE OF A RINO, MITT OR NEWT?

LET'S LOOK AT THE RECORD:

• MITT NEVER DID A TV COMMERCIAL WITH ANY DEM, BUT NEWT DID ONE WITH PELOSI SUPPORTING GLOBAL WARMING.

• MITT RAN AGAINST TEDDY JO KENNEDY.

• MITT NEVER PLAYED FOOTSY WITH AL SHARPTON, BUT NEWT DID - STILL DOES.

• MITT DIDN'T ENDORSE SCOZZAFAVA, NEWT DID.

• MITT WAS AMONG THE VERY FIRST TO ENDORSE RUBIO; NEWT WASN'T.

• MITT WAS AMONG THE FIRST TO ENDORSE AYOTTE, BUT NEWT WASN'T.

• MITT MADE MANY CAMPAIGN APPEARANCES WITH PALIN IN 2008, BUT NEWT DIDN'T.

• MITT NEVER WORKED FOR FREDDIE MAC, BUT NEWT DID.

• MITT NEVER WAS A LOBBYIST, BUT NEWT WAS.

• MITT NEVER ATTACKED THE FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM , CAPITALISM, OR PEOPLE WHO WORKED HARD AND BECAME SELF-MADE MILLIONAIRES, BUT NEWT HAS.

• NEWT IS MORE OF A RINO THAN MITT.

THERE ARE MORE REASONS MITT WOULD MAKE A FINE CONSERVATIVE STANDARD-BEARER AND A BETTER CANDIDATE TO DEFEAT OBAMA:

• MITT IS PRO-LIFE, PRO-TAX CUTS, PRO-SPENDING CUTS, ANTI-DEFENSE CUTS, AN UNAMBIGUOUS SUPPORTER OF ISRAEL AND HAS PROMISED TO REPEAL OBAMACARE AND DODD-FRANK.

• THE FACT THAT MITT PASSED A STATE HEALTHCARE REFORM MEANS THE LEFT CAN'T USE MEDISCARE AND HE CANNOT BE TARRED AS AN UN-CARING RETHUGLICAN WHO WANTS TO KEEP POOR PEOPLE FROM GETTING HEALTHCARE.

• ON TOP OF THAT, THE ETHICALLY CHALLENGED SERIAL ADULTERER'S NEGATIVES ARE HORRENDOUSLY HIGH AND HE CANNOT BEAT OBAMA.

MITT IS NO ADULTERER, NO APPEASER AND NO RINO.

YOU CAN'T SAY THAT NEWT. HE IS A SERIAL ADULTERER WHO APPEASED PELOSI AND SHARPTON AND ARAFAT AND WORKED FOR FREDDIE MAC AND LOBBIED FOR OTHERS.

NEWT IS MORE OF A RINO THAN MITT. HE'S A WELL KNOWN QUANTITY BY THE ELECTORATE AND THEY DON'T LIKE HIM.

NEWT WOULD LOSE AGAINST OBAMA.