- IN 2008 THE CHOICE WAS OBAMA VERSUS MCCAIN.
- OBAMA OUTSPENT MCCAIN BY 8-1 = SPENDING 1 BILLION BUCKS AND WON
- THERE IS NO DOUBT WE WOULD BE BETTER OFF HAD MCCAIN WON.
- AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN EVEN MORE BETTER OFF HAD ROMNEY - WHO IS MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN MCCAIN - WON THE NOMINATION AND BEAT OBAMA IN 2008.
- THAT'S BECAUSE IN 2008, ROMNEY RAN TO THE RIGHT OF MCCAIN; REMEMBER, ROMNEY WON THE ENDORSEMENT OF EVERY MAJOR CONSERVATIVE THAT YEAR, INCLUDING RUSH AND SEAN AND LEVIN.
- IT'S A FACT THAT ROMNEY HAS STAYED ON THE RIGHT EVER SINCE.
- AND IT'S A FACT THAT ROMNEY WAS THE FIRST MAJOR POLITICIAN TO ENDORSE RUBIO AND HALEY.
- THERE IS NO DOUBT ROMNEY WOULD BE A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN OBAMA IN 2013.
- THERE SHOULD BE NO DOUBT THAT - SHOULD HE WIN THE NOMINATION - ROMNEY WON'T BE OUTSPENT BY OBAMA THE WAY MCCAIN WAS, AND THAT HE WILL GIVE OBAMA THE TOUGHEST FIGHT; ALL THE POLLS SHOW THIS TO BE THE CASE.
THE ONLY WAY MITT CAN LOSE IS IF YOU MITT-BASHERS STAY HOME.
Sorry, but Romney SUCKS!!!
ReplyDeleteI know your gung ho for the guy, but all of Mitt's flip-flopping on the issues and Romneycare are going to be exploited by the media and they will destroy his chances!
Why vote for Mitt when you have obama, both are for BIG GOV and both want mandated gov healthcare!
RIP AMERICA!!!
hi booodghe.
ReplyDeletesorry but you are wrong.
i was gung ho for perry until he proved incapable of a winning campaign.
i also liked pawlenty before that.
and i luv palin - but her negatives are too high.
romnry is my default position.
for the rational reasons i provide.
it is not emotional or irrational.