A LOT LESS HARMFUL EXCEPT THAT IT REVEALS A PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR.
CONSERVATIVES WHO CONTINUE TO DEFEND CAIN DESPITE THE EVIDENCE ARE LIKE LEFTARDS WHO CONTINUE TO BELIEVE IN AGW DESPITE THE EVIDENCE.
OR WHO THINK CHARLIE SHEEN IS A PILLAR OF PROPRIETY AND THAT CBS WAS IN THE WRONG.
BECAUSE THIS IS STARTING TO HURT THE GOP, IT'S TIME FOR CAIN TO WITHDRAW.
Check this out:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.suntimes.com/8592168-417/sneed-witness-says-cain-accuser-hugged-him-during-tea-party-meeting-a-month-ago.html...
Nonsense. I would say that your allegiance to RINO Romney has badly damaged your judgment. Withdrawing in the face of unproved and unsourced allegations would be really stupid, especially since they haven't hurt Cain politically.
ReplyDeleteMost people, I think, are beginning to understand the Democrat smear machine and how it operates.
i have no allegiance to any potential nomineee - thats why i see clearly.
ReplyDeleteif clinton was bad then so is herm
I think you're confusing accusations with an admission of guilt. And as much as Cain's character comes under scrutiny, so too must the characters of his accuser also be given to scrutiny. Thus far, the accusations have their genesis in a woman with a very checkered record of credibility issues...paternity suits, bankruptcies, job-hopping, and she (Bialek), by happenstance, lives in the same building as David Axelrod. Another accuser has a position within the Obama administration as a communications director. So...2 of the accusers of long-ago alleged actions are immediately and justifiably worthy of close scrutiny. The similarities to adherents of the long-debunked AGW scam are tenuous, at best...there are reams of evidence and data vs. "he said, she said".
ReplyDeletei find them credible - at ;east as ,uch as brodderick and paul jones.
ReplyDeletebialek named dates and hotel names and submitted the sworn affidavit of her bf who swore she told him at the time it happened.
krashuhaar filed the claim years ago.
how can anyone say she's a liar?!?!?
they deserve scrutiny, but at some point you have ask yourself this, tory:
is there anything anyone can allege you will believe?
if not, then the problem is in your head, not mine.
there are reams of evidence agw is bs.
alarmists refuse to accept the data.
just as cain supporters refuse to accept bialek, krashuhaar and the other AS YET unnamed women.
WAKE UP.