THIS IS BS. HERE'S WHY:
- UNABOMBER : GREENS :: BREIVIK : ANTI-JIAHDISTS
- UNABOMBER : AL GORE, IPCC:: BREIVIK : GEERT WILDERS, SIOE
BREIVIK'S ACT WAS AN ACT OF MONSTROUS TERRORISM AND EVIL, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT ALL COUNTER-JIHADISTS ARE EVIL OR RESPONSIBLE FOR BREIVIK'S HORRIFIC ACT OF TERROR.
HOWEVER:
- BINLADENISTS : ISLAM :: MOHAMED : ISLAM
THE UNABOMBER IS A BAD GREEN AND BREIVIK IS A BAD ANTI-JIHADIST, BUT BINLADEN IS FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF THE FOUNDER OF ISLAM.
IOW:
- THE UNABOMBER'S MANIFESTO AND BREIVIK'S MANIFESTO ARE TWISTED PSYCHOTIC VERSIONS OF LEGITIMATE POLITICAL OUTLOOKS
- BUT BINLADENIST'S MANIFESTO IS THE KORAN AND SURA.
THINK ABOUT IT.
Good lord.
ReplyDeleteThis is completely incoherent.
let me use baby words so you understand.
ReplyDeletethe unabomber is to the green movement as breivik is to the counter-jihad.
iow:
just as the unabomber could not discredit the green movement, breivik cannot discredit the counter-jihad.
now, wisoc the crisco, dispute that.