IF ISLAM IS A TOLERANT RELIGION OF PEACE, THEN IRAN'S SUPREME COUNCIL AND SUPREME COURT DON'T UNDERSTAND ISLAM

IRAN'S DEEPLY RELIGIOUS LEADERS MUST NOT KNOW AS MUCH ABOUT ISLAM AS ISLAM'S APOLOGISTS IN THE WEST KNOW ABOUT ISLAM BECAUSE IRAN'S SUPREME COURT HAS SENTENCED A PERSON WHO CONVERTED FROM ISLAM TO CHRISTIANITY TO DEATH.

ERGO: ISLAM'S APOLOGISTS ARE WRONG ABOUT ISLAM.

PUT ANOTHER WAY:

• IF THE RADICAL ISLAMISTS ARE FUNDAMENTALISTS -

• WHICH IS SOMETHING THEIR LEFTIST APOLOGISTS HERE ARE ALWAYS SAYING,

• AS WHEN THEY COMPARE THE ISLAMISTS TO CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS ---

• (ONE, ANDREW SULLIVAN EVEN GOES AS FAR AS TO CALL RIGHT-WING FUNDAMENTALIST CHRISTIANS "CHRISTIANISTS"!) ---

• THEN AREN'T THE ISLAMIST "RADICALS" BEING FUNDAMENTALLY TRUE TO THE FUNDAMENTALS OF ISLAM? AND DOESN'T THAT MEAN THAT ISLAM IS FUNDAMENTALLY TERRORISTIC?

YES - THEY ARE, AND YES - IT DOES.

IRSHAD MANJI ALSO ESSENTIALLY THOUGH TACITLY ADMITS THIS WHEN SHE CALL THE ISLAMIST TERRORISTS "LITERALISTS:

What is the trouble with Islam?

Irshad Manji:

The problem with Islam today, in a word, is literalism.

AND, MANJI HAS ARGUED THAT MUSLIMS CAN EVOLVE TO HAVE A MORE “FIGURATIVE” APPRECIATION OF THE KORAN AND SURA AND HADITHS AND LIFE OF MOHAMED.

BUT BY MAKING THIS ARGUMENT, SHE IS TACITLY AGREEING WITH ME AND THE ”ROPMA” ARGUMENT:

MANJI IS ESSENTIALLY SAYING THAT MOHAMED AND THE HADITHS AND THE SURA AND THE KORAN ARE LITERALLY EXTREMIST AND JIHADIST AND VIOLENT AND SEXIST.

AND IN THIS SHE IS CORRECT.

THIS MEANS THAT THE IRANIAN MULLAHCRACY AND AL QAEDA AND THE TALIBAN ARE ALL TAKING THE KORAN AT ITS LITERAL VALUE.

WHICH MEANS THE KORAN IS TERRORISTIC AT ITS CORE.

IT'S TIME ISLAM'S APOLOGISTS ON THE LEFT WOKE UP.

LONG PASSED TIME.