IT GETS WORSE: MUSA COULD BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF EGYPT.FRANCE 24… Arab League Secretary General Amr Mussa announced Sunday his intention to appeal to the UN Security Council for a no-fly zone over Gaza, where repeated Israeli air strikes have left at least 18 people dead since Thursday.
AFP – Arab League chief Amr Mussa said on Sunday the organisation will ask the UN Security Council to impose a no-fly zone over Gaza, which Israel has pounded with air strikes in response to rocket fire.
Mussa told an emergency meeting of Arab League ambassadors that “the Arab bloc in the United Nations has been directed to ask for the convention of the Security Council to stop the Israeli aggression on Gaza and impose a no-fly zone.”
OBAMA IS ON BOARD YET - BUT HE JUST MIGHT GET ON BOARD, OR USE THE THREAT OF GETTING ON BOARD OR ABSTAINING AS LEVERAGE AGAINST ISRAEL.
THIS ISN'T PARANOIC PROJECTION: USING INTERNATIONAL MILITARY FORCE AGAINST ISRAEL IS SOMETHING SAMANTHA POWERS - OBAMA'S KEY FOREIGN POLICY ADVISOR, IT SEEMS - LONG AGO URGED:
ASIDE; SHE IS MARRIED TO WHITE HOUSE ADVISOR CASS SUNSTEIN - A LIBERAL FASCIST.
MORE ON SUNSTEIN HERE.
BASED ON WHAT HE'S DONE, OBAMA IS THE BIGGEST THREAT TO THE FREE WORLD:
- HE IS UNDERMINING OR FEDERAL FISCAL SOUNDNESS, (BY DOUBLING OUR FEDERAL DEFICIT),
- UNDERMINING OUR ECONOMY (BY RAISING TAXES AND INCREASING REGULATION AND OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL AND THE GREEN ENERGY SCAM),
- UNDERMINING OUR NATIONAL SECURITY, AND THE SECURITY OF OUR ALLIES AND THE FREE WORLD.
MORE THAN AL QAEDA AND IRAN AND RUSSIA AND CHINA.
I PRAY THE GOP CAN KEEP HIS DANGEROUS POLICIES IN CHECK UNTIL THE NEXT ELECTION WHEN WE CAN THROW THIS TRAITOROUS POSTMODERN LEFTIST OUT OF OFFICE.
UPDATE: HERE IS ONE EXAMPLE OF A BLOGGER WHO PREDICTED THIS: RICK MORAN WRITING AT FRONTPAGE:
In direct violation of its own charter, the UN has set itself up as the arbiter of where sovereignty begins and ends, tossing aside Article 51′s “inherent right to self-defense” clause. The Office of the Special Adviser for the Prevention of Genocide at the UN makes this clear. The individual state’s idea of sovereignty takes a back seat to the UN’s judgment: “Sovereignty no longer exclusively protects States from foreign interference; it is a charge of responsibility where States are accountable for the welfare of their people.”OBAMA'S INTERVENTION IN LIBYA AND EGYPT AND HIS REFUSAL TO INTERVENE IN SYRIA OR IRAN PROVES THAT OBAMA --- AND SOROS AND THE ENTIRE POSTMODERNIST LEFT --- IS FUNDAMENTALLY ANTAGONISTIC TO THE USA AND THE FREE WORLD AND HAS EFFECTIVELY ALIGNED ITSELF WITH OUR ENEMIES AND THAT MEANS GLOBAL JIHAD.Might R2P [THE "RIGHT TO PROTECT"] also be invoked by Israel’s enemies to target the Jewish State in its war of national survival against the Palestinians?
This has already become a reality. Michael Rubin, writing at Commentary Contentions, reports that the Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arnç said last week, “We wish that the United Nations had made such resolutions and countries had taken action in the face of incidents in Gaza, Palestine and the other regions.”
Does this explain the surprising decision of the Arab League to allow for R2P to be invoked for Libyan intervention?
Recall that the Arab League, the African Union, and numerous other regional developing world organizations originally opposed the concept of R2P. Could the prospect of a UN intervention in Gaza have encouraged the Arab League to back the Libyan adventure?
Even if it didn’t, you can rest assured that the next time Israel feels compelled to defend itself by going into Gaza and taking out terrorists who are attacking it, the League will be crying out for an international response to the “atrocities.” It will contend that Israel is not living up to its “responsibilities” to protect Palestinians. Such an argument will convince many — especially those who are predisposed to hate Israel in the first place. The US will then be in the unenviable position of being forced to veto such action in the Security Council, opening itself up to charges of hypocrisy.
Would we veto such a resolution? With NSC adviser Samantha Power‘s influence on Obama, it is highly questionable. Power is an avid R2P advocate; her 2002 book on the issue, A Problem from Hell, so affected Obama that he invited Power to join his Senate staff as a foreign policy fellow. She also briefly served on his campaign foreign-policy brain trust.
Power is also credited with influencing the president to adopt R2P as part of his foreign policy. But it is her views on Israel that should concern us most of all. She has a long record of antipathy toward the Jewish State. In a widely scrutinized interview with UC Berkeley’s Institute of International Studies, Power said that “a mammoth protection force” through an “external intervention” were “required” to impose a settlement between Israelis and the Palestinians. Her rather rambling and convoluted statement on the conflict clearly accused Israel of human rights violations, which warranted (R2P) intervention in the same way that the Rwandan genocide did. Such an action “might mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import” and would involve sacrificing billions the U.S. spends “servicing” the Israeli military to “invest” in a Palestinian state. Clearly, Power is someone who would readily impose a R2P solution on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But with her anti-Israeli disposition so apparent, one shudders to think what this would actually look like.
Other advocates of the R2P doctrine include numerous Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), which promote it for ideological reasons and also because of UN grants and funding. The International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect brings together many of these NGOs under one umbrella, where they can be more effective in both lobbying the UN and shaking the international money tree. The list of members is a Who’s Who of internationalists, one worlders, and leftist Utopians, including Oxfam, Citizens for Global Solutions, the International Crisis Group, the World Federalist Movement, Human Rights Watch, and The Stanley Foundation.
What all those groups have in common is a desire to destroy or vastly curtail the sovereignty of nations. And rising above all of them as chief financier and inspiration are George Soros and his Open Society Institute.
TO MAKE GLOBAL JIHAD HISTORY WE NEED TO MAKE THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY AND THE POSTMODERN LEFT HISTORY.
In order to establish their new world order they will need a new World War the plans have been made years ago,now they are being executed.
ReplyDelete