A FEW OF THE LEFT'S CONVENIENT ARGUMENTS

LEFTIES THINK THAT THE INTERPRETATIONS THEIR LEFTIST JUSTICES HAVE GIVEN TO THE CONSTITUTION ARE WRITTEN IN STONE - AND ARE STARE DECISIS,

BUT THAT INTERPRETATIONS THEY DON'T LIKE ARE PART OF THE "LIVING CONSTITUTION" - AND OPEN TO RE-INTERPRETATION.

HYPOCRITICAL? YES. AND ALSO HIGHLY CONVENIENT.

AND ANOTHER THING:

• LEFTIES THINK THAT THE CONSTITUTION CLEARLY APPLIES TO AND PROTECTS THINGS LIKE ABORTION - WHICH IS NEVER MENTIONED AT ALL...

• BUT THAT IT DOESN'T CLEARLY SPEAK TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN OFFICIAL RELIGION OR TO GUN RIGHTS - WHICH IT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONS

HOW CONVENIENT.

BECAUSE THEY HAVE FEW PRINCIPLES AND ARE MORAL RELATIVISTS, CONVENIENCE DEFINES MOST LEFTIST ARGUMENTS.

LIKE:

• WHITE CHRISTIAN HETERO MALES ARE SEXIST,

• BUT ISLAMO-MISOGYNISTS JUST HAVE A DIFFERENT CULTURE - ONE WHOSE VICTIM STATUS ENTITLES THEM TO SPECIAL DISPENSATION.

HOW CONVENIENT.

LIKE:

• BUSH WAS A FASCIST WHO TOOK AWAY OUR RIGHTS,

• BUT FIDEL AND MAO AND OBAMA ARE COOL, JUST DOING WHAT HAD TO BE DONE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES.

HOW CONVENIENT.

LIKE:

• RAISING TAXES ON CIGARETTES IS GOOD - BECAUSE RAISING TAXES ON SOMETHING WILL DISCOURAGE IT,

• BUT RAISING TAXES ON BUSINESS WON'T PUT A DAMPER ON COMMERCE.

HOW CONVENIENT.

AND SO ON...

GOT SOME MORE? PUT 'EM IN COMMENTS