Sunday, November 28, 2010

WHAT NEXT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY?

(Hat tip to Bob Mack for the graphic and the link below)

Look at how the Department of Homeland Security is overreaching its original parameters:
The Department of Homeland Security’s ICE has launched a major crackdown on websites enabling copyright infringement or selling counterfeits of trademarked goods. In just the past few days ICE has seized at least 12 domains, TorrentFreak reports.

[...]

...[T]he sites were seized before the site’s owner heard any charges or had the chance to submit any counter evidence in court. The owners of the sites had their property seized without being allowed to defend themselves.

[...]

In the aftermath of 9-11, when the creation of DHS was being debated, would your opinion have been swayed if you knew that, within just a few years, the proposed agency would be seizing websites peddling fake purses? Did you imagine that the proposed agency would soon demand to take naked photographs of randomly-selected U.S. citizens? Or, insist on its authority to physically grope children?

Now, ask yourself this: What will the Agency be doing 10 years from now? Or, 20? In a little more than half a decade, DHS has morphed from protecting us from terrorists to protecting us from fake merchandise. Who is going to protect us from DHS?
Immediately following 9/11, I cheered the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security. Most Americans felt the same way.

But just think of the department's powers now in the hands of an administration which is ever trying to grab more power.

3 comments:

  1. This is the problem with allowing the government more authority. You never know who is going to weld that power after the next election. Do we even have congressional over-site of this agency?

    ReplyDelete
  2. HI AOW.

    If they intend to implement everywhere these bodyscanners, then they will need extra troops personnel is this provided by the Obama’s Civilian National Security Force?A.k.a. Obama care .Are these the people ($chutz $taffels) who will operate these machines?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqId8L8isJA&feature=player_embedded

    ReplyDelete
  3. I didn't think the Department of Homeland Security was a good idea because I knew eventually it would come under a Democrat's administration.

    I was right.

    ReplyDelete