FOR THEIR ROLE IN 9/11, MUMBAI AND TIMES SQUARE, IT'S TIME TO ISOLATE AND NEUTRALIZE PAKISTAN'S JIHADISTS

FOR THEIR ROLE IN 9/11, MUMBAI AND TIMES SQUARE, IT'S TIME TO ISOLATE AND NEUTRALIZE PAKISTAN'S JIHADISTS.

HOW?

SIMPLE: ISSUE A FIVE-PART ULTIMATUM:

1. TELL THE PAKISTANI GOVERNMENT THAT IF THEY DON'T EXERT CONTROL OVER THE REGIONS IN WHICH JIHADISTS CURRENTLY NOW OPERATE, THAT WE WILL DECLARE THAT THESE REGIONS ARE de facto NO LONGER PART OF PAKISTAN...


2. AS A LAWLESS NON-NATIONAL REGIONS UNDER TERRORIST CONTROL WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO ATTACK THEM AT WILL AND WITH OVERWHELMING AND DISPROPORTIONATE FORCE...


3. THEN, GIVE THE PAKISTANIS 30 DAYS TO DESTROY THE TALIBAN, AL QAEDA -AND PURGE THE ISI AND ARMY...


4. IF THEY DON'T, THEN CARPET BOMB THESE REGIONS FOR SEVERAL MONTHS UNTIL THEY ARE DEVOID OF JIHAD...


5. IF PAKISTAN OBJECTS, THEN WE SHOULD IMMEDIATELY ENFORCE AN AIR & SEA BLOCKADE, AND IF THE BLOCKADE IS ATTACKED BY THE PAKISTANI MILITARY, OR IF WE ARE AGAIN ATTACKED BY PAKISTANI-BASED/ALLIED TERRORISTS - THEN WE SHOULD MAKE IT CLEAR TO PAKISTAN THAT WE WILL NUKE PAKISTAN'S MAJOR CITIES.

YES: I AM ARGUING THAT WE SHOULD THREATEN PAKISTAN WITH A TOTAL WAR THEY KNOW THEY CANNOT WIN.

WE'VE DONE IT BEFORE; IT WORKED.

• PAKISTAN IS ONE OF THE THREE ULTIMATE FRONTS OR ENEMY COMMAND POSTS IN WW4; (THE OTHERS ARE TEHRAN AND RIYADH).

• WE SHOULDN'T LIMIT OURSELVES TO HOT WARS ON BATTLEFIELD FRONTS IN REMOTE REGIONS FAR FROM THESE COMMAND POSTS, LIKE YEMEN AND SOMALIA AND PHILIPPINES AND AFGHANISTAN.

• IOW: WE SHOULDN'T REMAIN ON OUR CURRENT FOOTING - (FIGHTING LONG DRAWN OUT CAMPAIGNS IN SEVERAL FAR AWAY REGIONS AS THE ENEMY PENETRATES OUR NATION - AND THE ENTIRE WEST - AND WAGES STEALTH JIHAD AND POLITICAL JIHAD FROM WITHIN...

• AND AS THEY GET STRONGER AND GET MORE POWERFUL WEAPONS.

TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE.

THAT'S WHY WE SHOULD THREATEN PAKISTAN.

I THINK THEY'D SO WHAT WE DEMAND IN ORDER TO STOP US FROM HAVING TO CARRY OUT THE THREAT.

(More here.)