This is good news.
Maybe - if this is a trend and if Cameron has 2 good debates - the Tories can get to 40%.
DEDICATED TO EXPOSING DISINFORMATION AND PROPAGANDA AND TO PROMOTING UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS - WITH SHARP ANALYSIS AND BLUNT COMMENTARY. NO ADS. NO TIP-JAR. JUST THE TRUTH.
Hey Reliapundit!
ReplyDeleteHave you tried Vote Match, yet. Its a cool way to find out which of the several UK political parties is the best match for you. Try it at
http://www.votematch.org.uk/
Also, I don't have an email for you, so I'll say it here.
I would like you to know about the book I am working on. It will advocate the use of Internet voting in all US elections. Its entitled
How to Sideline the Superrich in All US Elections with Secure Internet Voting
The first draft is finished. Two chapters discuss the security issues. It can be done with all the security of an online purchase or electronic banking.
One chapter is entitled "The Original Intentions of the Framers for US Presidential Elections."
I also discuss the outrageous costs of running for president. Obama spent about $740,000,000 in 2008. Of course, this gives an unfair advantage to the superrich who can make big contributions.
Most importantly, I show how a system of presidential elections based on Internet voting can neutralize the power of Big Money, and make the president and vice-president directly dependent upon the people who elected them.
The superrich, and everyone else, will be free to spend as much money as they want to, but with the system I propose big spending cannot influence the voter's choice.
No agent/pub, yet. But all my chapter drafts are online for free reading or downloading at:
http://ssrn.com/author=1053589
You and your readers are welcome to read any of this, and comment on it to me, or in your own writing.
Yours,
William J. Kelleher, Ph.D.
Political Scientist, author, speaker, CEO for
The Internet Voting Research and Education Fund
A CA Nonprofit Foundation
Email: InternetVoting@gmail.com