As I’ve noted before, I don’t believe these revelations “disprove” global warming. The weight of existing scientific evidence still firmly supports the hypothesis that human activity is contributing to climatic warming. The releases do, however, demonstrate that many climate researchers have sought to stifle debate, downplay uncertainties, and exaggerate the risks posed by climate change.
REPEAT:
The releases do, however, demonstrate that many climate researchers have sought to stifle debate, downplay uncertainties, and exaggerate the risks posed by climate change.
REPEAT:
The releases do, however, demonstrate that many climate researchers have sought to stifle debate, downplay uncertainties, and exaggerate the risks posed by climate change.
THE WHOLE ENTIRE FREAKIN' POLITICAL AGENDA OF THE AGW ALARMISTS - LIKE GORE, OBAMA, THE IPCC ET AL - IS BASED ON "PEER-REVIEWED RESEARCH" CONTROLLED BY THOSE WHO, " sought to stifle debate, downplay uncertainties, and exaggerate the risks posed by climate change."
STIFLE DEBATE.
DOWNPLAY UNCERTAINTIES.
AND EXAGGERATE RISKS.
IT IS UNEQUIVOCAL AND INCONTROVERTIBLE THAT THOSE ACTIONS MAKE THE AGW "PEER-REVIEWED RESEARCH" NOTHING MORE THAN PROPAGANDA AND THEIR POLITICAL AGENDA NOTHING MORE THAN A POWER GRAB.
IF THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE IPCC HAD A SHRED OF INTEGRITY THEY'D CANCEL THE COPENHAGEN CONFERENCE.
THEY DON'T. THEY WON'T.
BUT THEIR MEETING WILL HAVE ABOUT AS MUCH PRO-SOCIAL VALUE AS A CONVENTION OF COLLECTIVIST COCKROACHES OR A PARLIAMENT OF PUSILLANIMOUS PICKPOCKETS.
SO OBAMA BELONGS THERE!
No comments:
Post a Comment