BY FINALLY CONDEMNING THE IRANIAN REGIME'S VIOLENCE AGAINST THE DEMONSTRATORS, OBAMA HAS PROVEN THAT EVERYONE WHO SAID "OBAMA IS WISE NOT TO COME OUT AND ATTACK THE IRANIAN REGIME TOO STRONGLY" WERE WRONG.
CNN: Obama toughens his talk on Iran
President Obama sharpened his language on Iran and stressed the urgency of overhauling the health care system at a news conference Tuesday.
"The United States and the international community have been appalled and outraged by the threats, beatings and imprisonments of the last few days," the president said, adding that he strongly condemns "these unjust actions."
OBAMA IS CONDEMNING THE HORRIFIC VIOLENCE BUT STOPPING SHORT OF ATTACKING THE CURRENT REGIME AND CALLING FOR REGIME CHANGE.
THIS IS WRONG AND IMMORAL. AND A BAD STRATEGY.
HERE'S WHY:
- NEUTRALITY IN THE FACE OF EVIL IS NOT AMORAL; IT IS IMMORAL.
- NEUTRALITY IN THE FACE OF EVIL ISN'T REALISM; IT IS DEFEATISM.
- TO BE NEUTRAL IN THE FACE OF EVIL IS TO AID AND ABET EVIL.
REMEMBER:
SACRIFICING THE SUDETENLAND DID NOT PLACATE, ASSUAGE OR DETER HITLER.
IT WASN'T REALISM; IT WAS A FLIGHT FROM REALISM INTO A WISHFUL FANTASY: A FANTASY OF A NEGOTIATED PEACE WITH HITLER.
SACRIFICING THE IRANIAN DEMONSTRATORS TO THE MULLAHS (FOR THE SAKE OF NEGOTIATING A NUCLEAR DEAL) - OR SACRIFICING ISRAEL FOR THAT MATTER (ON THE ALTAR OF "THE PEACE PROCESS") - CANNOT EVER BRING THE WORLD CLOSER TO PEACE AND HARMONY.
- AGGRESSIVELY BRINGING THE IRANIAN REGIME DOWN WILL MAKE THE WORLD SAFER BECAUSE ONLY A NEW REGIME CAN BE TRUSTED TO ABIDE BY ANY DEAL.
- SUPPORTING THE IRANIAN PEOPLE'S REBELLION IS THE BEST WAY TO BRING THE CURRENT REGIME DOWN.
- WE SHOULD OPENLY AND AGGRESSIVELY SUPPORT MOUSAVI AND KOROUBI AND RAFSANAJANI AND MONTAZERI AND KHATAMI.
Heh, you think this will stop the left?
ReplyDelete