Monday, May 11, 2009

OBAMA, THE SEIU, AND THE CORRUPT CHICAGO MACHINE: WHO'S RUNNING THE WHITE HOUSE?


OBAMA, THE SEIU, AND THE CORRUPT CHICAGO MACHINE: WHO'S RUNNING THE WHITE HOUSE?

ALL OF THE ABOVE, THAT'S WHO.

MORE PROOF FROM THE LATIMES:
SEIU may be linked to ultimatum on withholding stimulus funds
California officials say the union may have influenced a federal requirement that a pay cut be reversed for home healthcare workers.

Reporting from Sacramento -- Officials in the governor's office say a politically powerful union may have had inappropriate influence over the Obama administration's decision to withhold billions of dollars in federal stimulus money from California if the state does not reverse a scheduled wage cut for the labor group's workers.

The officials say they are particularly troubled that the Service Employees International Union, which lobbied the federal government to step in, was included in a conference call in which state and federal officials reviewed the wage cut and the terms of the stimulus package.
... SEIU was among the biggest donors to President Obama's campaign, contributing $33 million.
GATEWAY HAS PROOF IT WAS REALLY $60 MILLION - AND THEY'RE SO PROUD THEY'RE BRAGGIN' ABOUT IT!

AND NOW... THEY'RE COLLECTING!

WE WROTE ABOUT THE CORRUPT SEIU-OBAMA-ACORN AXIS IN JULY 2008 (IT'S A LONG DETAILED LINK-FILLED POST, HERE'S AN EXCERPT):
  • THE SEIU AND AFSCME SUPPORT OBAMA FOR THE SAME REASON THE CORRUPT CHICAGO MACHINE DOES: THEY WANT TO GET THEIR GRUBBIE STINKING COMMIE HANDS ON THE FEDERAL BUDGET.
  • REMEMBER: THE SEIU AND AFSCME ARE UNIONS REPRESENTING GOVERNMENT WORKERS.
  • THE MO' BIIGER OBAMA MAKES GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS THE MO' MONEY THE UNION MAKES.
  • QUID PRO QUO.
  • SCUM.
AND AGAIN IN DECEMBER 2008 (EXCERPT):
IN 2005, WE CALLED IT "THE AXIS-OF-TAXES":
"government workers" (like NEA teachers, and AFSCME white collar bureaucrats, and SEIU etc) are PAID FROM TAXES and are also HUGE supporters of the Democrat Party. They are perhaps the strongest backers of the party - in money, right after the Left-wing billionaires like Soros, Lewis, and Heinz-Kerry. And they might contribute the most to the Democrats when one takes into account manpower hours during campaigning and their get out the vote efforts.

This is OBVIOUSLY one reason why the Democrats FAVOR BIGGER GOVERNMENT AND INCREASING GOVERNMENT SPENDING: It's a PAYOFF their supporters.

In this light, it's OBVIOUS that the "government employeee union"/Democrat Party alignment nothing more than a self-serving "AXIS FOR TAXES" and that this is why the AXIS nearly always favors more government programs and higher taxes: in order to pay for higher wages and more perks for MORE government workers/union members.
THE SEIU IS A CENTRAL SPOKE IN THE CORRUPT "AXIS OF TAXES."

RIGHT NOW, OBAMA IS THE HUB.
AND WE WROTE ABOUT IT AS RECENTLY AS FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR:
THE CHICAGO MACHINE RUNS THE WHITE HOUSE AND WROTE THE STIMULUS PACKAGE: "IT'S A DEMOCRAT PATRONAGE BILL"

DOUG HAS THE DETAILS; EXCERPT:
"... I was in a meeting after Obama got elected and I was told by the Democratic officials in that meeting that we were gonna give billions of dollars that was gonna come down the pike, our way, and what we were to do with it was we were supposed to do with it...

We are gonna build an army of Democratic patronage jobs.... gonna completely freeze up the Republicans forever and ever...

It's a job-capturing system, the same one they have in Chicago... everyone's asking 'why isn't that money being released until 2011 and 2012?' "
RTWT.
OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST AT HIS CORE.


OBAMA: THE TARTUFO PRESIDENT: BROWN ON THE OUTSIDE; BROWN AND WHITE ON THE INSIDE - WITH A RED CORE.

UPDATE: BEAT HIM AGAUN: 2 HOURS LATER AND INSTAPUNDIT LINKS TO THE SAME STORY.

1 comment:

  1. Michelle Obama's boy is whipped.
    She's the man!

    I suspect Michelle had an abortion or two or three and so she makes her little man-toy do everything he can to make make it OK so she won't have to face the fact that she is a murderer.

    Why else would he be so obsessed with making it "acceptable" to kill so many babies?

    ReplyDelete