- BUSH'S "COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM" REALLY MEQSN PRO-LIFE HAWK WHO IS A LIBERAL WHEN IT COMES TO GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
- LIKE THE GOOD LIBERAL HE IS, BUSH INCREASED DOMESTIC SPENDING TO HEIGHTS NOT SEEN SINCE THE GREAT SOCIETY.
- THAT'S WHY WE'RE IN THE MESS WE'RE IN: BECAUSE BUSH DID NOT GOVERN AS A CONSERVATIVE.
- THE FANNIE MAE CRISIS WAS DUE IN PART TO BUSH'S LIBERAL EFFORTS TO INCREASE HOME OWNERSHIP AMONG POOR MINORITIES WITHOUT DECENT CREDIT.
- BUSH DIDN'T JUST EMBRACE FANNIE MAE; HE GAVE HER A FRENCH KISS.
“The Bush administration took a lot of pride that homeownership had reached historic highs,” Mr. Snow said in an interview. “But what we forgot in the process was that it has to be done in the context of people being able to afford their house. We now realize there was a high cost.”
... Darrin West could not believe it. The president of the United States was standing in his living room.It was June 17, 2002, a day Mr. West recalls as “the highlight of my life.” Mr. Bush, in Atlanta to unveil a plan to increase the number of minority homeowners by 5.5 million, was touring Park Place South, a development of starter homes in a neighborhood once marked by blight and crime.
Mr. West had patrolled there as a police officer, and now he was the proud owner of a $130,000 town house, bought with an adjustable-rate mortgage and a $20,000 government loan as his down payment — just the sort of creative public-private financing Mr. Bush was promoting.
“Part of economic security,” Mr. Bush declared that day, “is owning your own home.”... So Mr. Bush had to, in his words, “use the mighty muscle of the federal government” to meet his goal. He proposed affordable housing tax incentives. He insisted that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac meet ambitious new goals for low-income lending.
Concerned that down payments were a barrier, Mr. Bush persuaded Congress to spend up to $200 million a year to help first-time buyers with down payments and closing costs.
And he pushed to allow first-time buyers to qualify for federally insured mortgages with no money down. Republican Congressional leaders and some housing advocates balked, arguing that homeowners with no stake in their investments would be more prone to walk away, as Mr. West did. Many economic experts, including some in the White House, now share that view.
The president also leaned on mortgage brokers and lenders to devise their own innovations. “Corporate America,” he said, “has a responsibility to work to make America a compassionate place.”
POLICIES STARTED BY LIBERAL CLINTON
AND EXPANDED BY LIBERAL BUSH
- FEDERAL SPENDING WILL ALMOST ALWAYS BE WASTEFUL AND CORRUPT BECAUSE THE BUREAUCRACY AIN'T SPENDING THEIR OWN MONEY;
- THEY ARE SPENDING OURS!
- THAT'S WHY FOLKS WHO BENEFIT FROM LARGE FEDERAL SPENDING PROGRAMS CAN BUY A SENATOR AND THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS HE OVERSEES FOR $100,000 OVER TEN YEARS.
- THE ONLY SOLUTION IS HAVING THE SMALLEST POSSIBLE GOVERNMENT.
Don't you think you're a little late with the complaints? Where were you five or six years ago?
ReplyDeleteIN WAS COMPLAINING. YOU ASSHOLE.
ReplyDeleteI POSTED THAT DUBYA STANDS FOR WIMP YEARS AGO; I HAVE ARGUED THAT BUSH IS A LIB FOR YEARS.
ReplyDeleteA LIB HAWK WHO IS PRO-LIFE.
Bush surely is not an economic conservative. He actually tried however to correct the problems at FNMA. "Progressives" sought to maintain the status quo at FNMA and the flow of bad mortgages many of which could not perform. The usual economic terrorists (Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and ilk) have escaped blame for the biggest economic crisis in the history of the world; apparently leaving Bush holding the bag.
ReplyDeleteBlame for the crisis should be focused where it belongs: government had no constitutional power to interfere in the home mortgage business, and when it did, starting in the 1930s, the die was cast.
Mortgage financing fell into the laps of liberals as a convenient means of redistributing wealth. "Progressive" increasing interference in the mortgage finance business was justified as a means to the end of wealth redistribution; risks be damned.
Not a Bush problem.
yes: bush wanted more oversight of fannie mae.
ReplyDeletebut the root cause is fannie mae's c.r.a. directive to give credit to folks who don't deserve it.
Hey, you guys want to help resist liberal non-sense and promote your blog at the same time? Join the Liberty Tree. Everytime you post, it will show up on all members sites. Go here for more details.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.rightpundits.com/?page_id=2379
And chaussure nike shoes
ReplyDeleteCome here to have a look of our Wholesale Jeans
Many fashionMens Jeans ,eye-catching
Womens Jeans ,and special out standing
Blue Jeans ,you can spend less money on our
Discount Jeans but gain really fine jeans, absolutely a great bargain.
www.crazypurchase.com
China Wholesale
wholesale from china
buy products wholesale
China Wholesalers