THE 2008 ELECTION: WHAT'S RACE GOT TO DO WITH IT? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

ON THE ONE HAND WE HAVE THE WHITE MCCAIN: three decades of service to the nation: in uniform, in combat, in war-time, in a POW camp - TORTURED; in the House and n the Senate - with his name DIRECTLY associated with the biggest BI-PARTISAN "reform" bills of his era. A man who never failed to speak out clearly and unambiguously - regardless of the political fallout.

ON THE OTHER HAND WE HAVE THE HALF-WHITE OBAMA: who worked as a 'community organizer" in Chicago without distinction, and then served in the Illinois state legislature without distinction and then served for one year in the US Senate without distinction before deciding to run for the presidency.

AND NOTE THIS CONTRAST:

THE WHITE PRONE-TO-SUNBURN MCCAIN HAS HAD ZERO - as in $0.00 - EARMARKS SINCE HE WAS A SENATOR, 20 YEARS - AND HAS ACTUALLY FOUGHT PORK BARREL SPENDING.

THE HALF-KENYAN MOCHA-SKINNED OBAMA HAS HAS $740 million - that's $740,000,000 since being a Senator - IN ER UM... JUST FOUR YEARS.

NOW...

• THERE'S ABSO-EFFIN-LUTELY NOTHING INTERESTING OR RELEVANT ABOUT MCCAIN'S LACK OF SKIN PIGMENTATION OR OBAMA'S AMPLE SKIN PIGMENTATION. IT'S A MEANINGLESS CONTRAST.
  

• AND THE INCLUSION OF RACIALIST TERMS IN THE ABOVE PROVES IT.

• THERE ARE VERY REAL AND IMPORTANT PERSONAL AND POLITICAL CONTRASTS BETWEEN THESE TWO MEN - AND THEY COULD NOT BE MORE RELEVANT OR STARK:

• ONE MAN IS READY, HAS THE CHARACTER TO LEAD AND IS WORTHY OF YOUR TRUST.

• THE OTHER IS A SWEET-TALKING INEXPERIENCED AND MENDACIOUS SHAM WHO IS UNTRUSTWORTHY.
  

VOTE ACCORDINGLY.

• REMEMBER:
• THEIR AGE, SKIN-TONE, ETHNICITY, AND HEIGHT ARE IRRELEVANT.
• NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT THEM EXCEPT FOR OBAMA.
• WHICH IS MORE PROOF HE IS UNFIT FOR OFFICE: HE'D SACRIFICE OUR NATIONAL RACE RELATIONS FOR HIS PERSONAL POLITICAL VICTORY.

OBAMA IS SCUM.