Monday, January 07, 2008

OBAMA'S CORRUPT DEALINGS WITH CHICAGO DEVELOPER REZKO

WE BLOGGED THIS TWO YEARS AGO. NO ONE WAS INTERESTED THEN.

OMABAMGATE CONTINUED: THE REZKO LAND DEAL (12/17/06)
WASH POST/VIA MALKIN:
In June 2005, in what Obama now describes as a "boneheaded" mistake, Obama and Rezko's wife bought adjacent properties on Chicago's South Side, closing the deals on the same day.

Seven months later, wanting a bigger yard for his $1.65 million house, Obama bought a slice of the Rezko property for
$104,500.
"Bonehead deal"?! From the smartest man in the democrat party!? YEAH, RIGHT! Obama's a crook. (The photo on the left shows Rezko and his mouthpiece leaving court after pleading not guilty to a recent indictment. Rezko is on the right.)
WE FOLLOWED UP WITH THIS, 9 MONTHS AGO - IN APRIL 2007:
OBAMA: A CORRUPT CROOK IN DEEP WITH A CORRUPT CHICAGO REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES (VIA PAJAMAS MEDIA):
U.S. Sen. Barack Obama said Monday he accepted campaign contributions from Antoin "Tony'' Rezko without knowing that Rezko was a slumlord with problem buildings in the state Senate district Obama represented at the time.

"Should I have known these buildings were in a state of disrepair? My answer would be that it wasn't brought to my attention,'' Obama, who's seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, said at a South Side campaign stop.

His comments came in response to a Chicago Sun-Times report that he had done previously undisclosed legal work between 1995 and 1998 on a series of troubled low-income-housing deals involving Rezmar Corp., owned by the indicted businessman.

Obama worked for a small Chicago law firm -- Davis Miner Barnhill & Galland -- between 1993 and 2004. The firm worked on deals that got $43 million in government funds for 15 apartment buildings Rezmar rehabilitated with not-for-profit community groups. Four of the buildings ended up being foreclosed on.
OBAMA IS OBVIOUSLY LYING.

REZKO AND OBAMA ARE VERY CLOSE: REZKO HELPED OBAMA BUY HIS MANSION - JUST A FEW YEARS AGO. WITHOUT REZKO, OBAMA COULD NOT HAVE BOUGHT HIS HOME.
After graduating from Harvard Law, the then utterly unknown Obama was contacted by a bright aggressive NYC literary agent who thought - because of Obama's mixed heritage and modest background - BHO Jr might have an interesting story to tell. They signed a contract. After much work, the agent sold Obama Jr's book. It was Obama Jr's first.

After Obama Jr's pretty and pretty well-received convention speech in 2004 - (and before he was elected to the Senate) - he broke this contract with this agent, (the one who picked him up out of nowhere and got him his first book deal), in order to sign with a bigger agent, (to whom he was introduced by perjurer Bill Clinton).

Instead of being loyal to the agent who helped put him on the map, he dumped her the first chance he got, and jumped on to the roster of a bigger bigshot - who didn't have to break a sweat in order to sell Obama Jr's SECOND book! (Barack Hussein Obama Jr. eventually agreed to a settlement for breaking his contract with his first agent.)
OBAMA: NOTHING BUT A SMOOTH-TALKING LEFT-WING CROOK.

WHICH IS WHY HE'S THE PERFECT STANDARD-BEARER FOR THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!

(AND WHY THESE REVELATIONS DON'T SEEM TO BOTHER ANY DEMS!)

1 comment:

  1. I grew up in the 60's and 70's Clinton bush didn't trigger me, but Obama is at the very least running on Adderall, I know a tweeker when I see and listen to one. If he has ADHD like he has flirted with admitting saying he can't focus on detail so his staff supports him, he most likely is taking Adderall that would explain what I sense. This medication should be disclosed and discussed.




    At the risk of insulting any bipolar members of our group but as an example a manic depressive could really be a perfect person to campaign and win. During the manic phase they are super human! But, then comes the depressive side. Why do bipolars go off their meds? Because the call of the manic side of their personality is so enticing, unending almost orgasmic bliss with endless energy available but the crash that follows is a killer. I believe we should know the medical condition of politicians and their medications a matter of public record. Give us a choice if we think that we want a bipolar medicated President then we vote for them if not we don't. In my opinion all politicians should be drug tested and disclose their medical conditions. As an employer I have had two bipolars work for me, this doesn't make me an expert but it does give me real life experience. I loved the peak of the manic state, there are no better producers, endless energy, bright, quick, happy, I have also been there holding hands with them at the turn, their incoherent ramblings as they are talking with God, god is telling them to harm a loved one, they haven't slept in 2-3 months and are now nonfunctioning. This isn't the only medical condition that worries me but it is a good example of why we need a discloser of medical condition and medication for our politicians. I would like to know if someone I am voting for is running on Adderall.

    Bill Heath

    Tucson, AZ

    ReplyDelete