SCOOTER, TIMMY AND BJ: SHOULD BILL CLINTON BE INDICTED FOR PERJURY?

HERE'S A LINK TO A GOOD ARTICLE ABOUT RUSSERT AND HILLARY'S BACK'N FORTH ON HER HUSBAND'S UNWILLINGNESS TO MAKE AN EARLY RELEASE OF DOCUMENTS FROM HIS PRESIDENCY WHICH INVOLVE HER.

• THE LINK HAS A GREAT VIDEO OF BJ DEFENDING HILLARY - AND ATTACKING RUSSERT - (HE EVEN WAGS HIS FINGER, JUST LIKE WHEN HE DENIED HAVING SEX WITH LEWINSKY!).

• THERE MIGHT BE INSIGHTFUL INFORMATION IN THOSE DOCUMENTS WHICH WOULD HELP THE PUBLIC LEARN MORE ABOUT HILLARY. RUSSERT VIEWS THE CLINTON'S LACK OF CANDOR AND OPENNESS AS SUSPICIOUS - AS IN: "WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?"

• AMONG OTHER THINGS, BILL SAYS THAT TIM SAID THE RELEASE DATE FOR THE WHITE HOUSE DOCUMENTS IN QUESTION IS 2009. BUT TIM SAID IT WAS 2012. AND TIM WAS CORRECT. THERE MIGHT BE INSIGHTFUL INFORMATION WHICH WOULD HELP THE PUBLIC LEARN MORE ABOUT HILLARY.

• THE LAST TIME SOMEONE HAD A DIFFERENT RECOLLECTION THAN TIM RUSSERT, HE WAS CONVICTED OF PERJURY.

• HIS NAME WAS LIBBY.

• MAYBE IT'S TIME TO INDICT BJ CLINTON?

JUST SAYING.